Originally Posted by lew Who cares? If he had the weapons, or if he didn't, we still had no right to go in there and subjugate that nation. Because these guys just can't admit when they are wrong. The best part is they are still spreading these lies about Iraq ...
08-08-2006, 10:26 AM
| #61 | ||||
| helluo librorum The Lab Moderator  Humanist Chicago Suburbs 
| Originally Posted by lew Because these guys just can't admit when they are wrong.
The best part is they are still spreading these lies about Iraq and WMD. | ||||
     |
|
08-08-2006, 10:27 AM
| #62 | ||||
| Banned  Conservative Government is another way to say Better Than You
| Originally Posted by lew if saddam had old weapons, it's certainly not hard to imagine he had new ones as well. the fact is, he broke the rules already, and there was nothing stopping him from continuing to break them.
| ||||
| |
|
08-08-2006, 10:30 AM
| #63 | ||||
| Anti-War, Anti-State, Pro-Free Market  Capitalist
| Originally Posted by ballz2wallz
But that's the problem. It is all imagination. None of this is based on fact. Yes, it is fact that older weapons were found. But they were proven to be ineffective. There were absolutely no newer weapons found. | ||||
| |
|
08-08-2006, 10:32 AM
| #64 | ||||
| Banned Conservative Government is another way to say Better Than You
| Originally Posted by lew i think it's very possible they were moved before we got there.
| ||||
| |
|
08-08-2006, 10:34 AM
| #65 | ||||
| Anti-War, Anti-State, Pro-Free Market Capitalist
| Originally Posted by ballz2wallz
I think it's possible too. Just like I think and hope it's possible that a Libertarian will win the Presidency in '08. Sadly for both of us, we're both wrong and somewhat delusional. | ||||
| |
|
08-08-2006, 10:35 AM
| #66 | ||||
| helluo librorum The Lab Moderator Humanist Chicago Suburbs
| Originally Posted by ballz2wallz It's possible that they never had any as well.
| ||||
| |
|
08-08-2006, 10:39 AM
| #67 | ||||
| Banned Conservative Government is another way to say Better Than You
| Originally Posted by Scrumtralecent less likely IMO
| ||||
| |
|
08-08-2006, 10:43 AM
| #68 | ||||
| helluo librorum The Lab Moderator Humanist Chicago Suburbs
| Originally Posted by ballz2wallz Less likely than moving them across the desert under our noses? Not really.
| ||||
| |
|
08-08-2006, 12:07 PM
| #69 | ||||
| Junkie  Conservative Party
| Originally Posted by DosEquis
 We didnt have to be right, Iraq had to prove he got rid of all his weapons. He was still buying/making weapons the day we invaded. | ||||
| |
|
08-08-2006, 12:10 PM
| #70 | ||||
| helluo librorum The Lab Moderator Humanist Chicago Suburbs
| Originally Posted by Diesel66 Everyone in the know disagrees with you.
| ||||
| |
|
08-08-2006, 12:15 PM
| #71 | ||||
| Junkie Conservative Party
| Originally Posted by Scrumtralecent
Roland 3 missiles manufactured after the boycott ? Long range missiles ? Long range drones ? | ||||
| |
|
08-08-2006, 12:16 PM
| #72 | ||||
| helluo librorum The Lab Moderator Humanist Chicago Suburbs
| Originally Posted by Diesel66 In regards to the subject of this thread, WMD.
| ||||
| |
|
08-08-2006, 12:18 PM
| #73 | ||||
| Junkie Conservative Party
| Originally Posted by Scrumtralecent In regards to the cease fire he signed and failed to follow.
| ||||
| |
|
08-08-2006, 12:20 PM
| #74 | ||||
| For those about to rock...  libertarian Atlanta, GA
| Originally Posted by Diesel66 You can't just change your arguement on a whim like this dude. You can't go from saying he had WMD's and that's why we invaded to he violated a cease fire without WMDs. Jesus Christ.
| ||||
| |
|
08-08-2006, 12:24 PM
| #75 | ||||
| helluo librorum The Lab Moderator Humanist Chicago Suburbs
| Originally Posted by Ardentfrost It's called having a back-up argument for the weak one you started with.
 Up next: The torture rooms and Saddams mistreatment of his people was the reason we invaded. | ||||
| |
|
08-08-2006, 12:32 PM
| #76 | ||||
| Junkie Conservative Party
| Originally Posted by Ardentfrost That was the argument all along. He never followed the damn cease fire, we see these weapons out in the open. We saw these weapons when Clinton bombed them. And the intel points to him having chem weapons still.
Originally Posted by Scrumtralecent
Congressional Resolution on Iraq (Passed by House and Senate October 2002) Why we went to war, Congress approved. | ||||
| |
|
08-08-2006, 12:33 PM
| #77 | ||||
| helluo librorum The Lab Moderator Humanist Chicago Suburbs
| Originally Posted by Diesel66 And those would be where?
| ||||
| |
|
08-08-2006, 12:36 PM
| #78 | ||||
| helluo librorum The Lab Moderator Humanist Chicago Suburbs
| Originally Posted by Diesel66 And that had nothing to do with the shitty intel the adminsitration was banking on while ignoring sources that told him Iraq wasn't a threat. Much of congress and the administration have admitted they were wrong, why can't you guys?
Let me guess, you think the American people would have still supported this invasion if the the term WMD never came up in regards to Iraq. | ||||
| |
|
08-08-2006, 12:47 PM
| #79 | ||||
| Banned Conservative Government is another way to say Better Than You
| Originally Posted by Ardentfrost WMDs were not the sole reason we went ot iraq. we also went in because he wasn't cooperating for what, over a decade. WMDs have now become a focus because it's ammo against the bush admin.
| ||||
| |
|
08-08-2006, 12:47 PM
| #80 | ||||
| Banned Conservative Government is another way to say Better Than You
| Originally Posted by Scrumtralecent i do
 | ||||
| |
