Originally Posted by 7960 actually the rich are getting richer and the poor are getting richer... the gap between them is increasing but that isn't what's important...what's important is that the poor, today, can afford more than the poor of 50 years ago. That is why liberals like to measure ...
| | #21 | ||||
| Political Genius Republican Yorba Linda Ca. ![]()
| Originally Posted by 7960
That is why liberals like to measure median income so they can tell you the middle class is failing. The upward income at the bottom pushes that number down. The rich help provide much of that income through employment for all those levels, and the tax benefits as documented, but they are the bad guys!
__________________ Sock It To Me! ![]() "Bureaucracy is a Parasite that Preys on Free Thought and Suffocates Free Spirit!" - Douglas Adams | ||||
| Register to Reply to This Post |
| | #22 | ||||
| Audaces fortuna iuvat Moderate Northern VA ![]()
| Originally Posted by RMNIXON you're confusing median with mean
median income is much less skewed than mean income, because outliers don't hold as much weight. | ||||
| Register to Reply to This Post |
| | #23 | ||||
| Administrator libertarian Oklahoma ![]()
| Originally Posted by Pro Street This is true but in figuring the "mean" they typically throw out only the high numbers...
But I definately agree, median is a far better measure than mean when it comes to incomes of a given economy. | ||||
| Register to Reply to This Post |
| Register to Post a Reply |
| Bookmarks |
| Tags |
| taxes, rich, poor |
| ||||||
| Thread Tools | |
| |
| vBulletin 3.7.2 -- Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd. | Custom Artwork and Theme (TM) 2006, Liberty Lounge |