Edwards (49%) Giuliani (43%) Edwards (47%) McCain (38%) Edwards (55%) Romney (29%) Edwards (50%) Thompson (36%) Edwards (50%) Huckabee (41%) Rasmussen Premium section has the rest, but the link has the big news, him beating Rudy and trouncing rising star Thompson Edwards vs. Thompson, Giuliani This is pretty big, I ...
| |||||||
|
| Register to Post a Reply |
| | LinkBack | Thread Tools |
| | #1 | ||||
| Banned Progressive Philadelphia, PA ![]()
| Edwards break through: New Rasmussen numbers shows he beats any GOP by at least 6 pts Edwards (49%) Giuliani (43%) Edwards (47%) McCain (38%) Edwards (55%) Romney (29%) Edwards (50%) Thompson (36%) Edwards (50%) Huckabee (41%) Rasmussen Premium section has the rest, but the link has the big news, him beating Rudy and trouncing rising star Thompson Edwards vs. Thompson, Giuliani This is pretty big, I think a lot of Democrats uneasy about Obama and Hillary are going to take a second look at Edwards, and when the money comes in...we now see the American people can pick him even people like Thompson, Rudy...are at the TOP of their image game | ||||
| Register to Reply to This Post |
| | #2 | ||||
| TPS Member Independent ![]()
| When more comes out - and it will - he'll drop back into the pack. Beating a republican in 08'? Wow, Some challenge! Here's a better egg hunt, find an elephant who can lick the best the donkeys can put up. Now that would be something to write home about. | ||||
| Register to Reply to This Post |
| | #3 | ||||
| ..... your a worthless poster Realist ![]() ![]()
| Edwards should have planned his wife's cancer relapse better...closer to the election would have worked in his favor. As it is he's ahead now because of sympathy, NOT because he miraculously became a better politician in the last few weeks. He should fire his campaign manager for allowing her recurrence at a bad time and use his ambulance-chaser lawyer buddies to get the doc to retract the report until nearer to election time. | ||||
| Register to Reply to This Post |
| | #4 | ||||
| helluo librorum The Lab Moderator Humanist Chicago Suburbs ![]() ![]()
| Originally Posted by 7960
What a fucking asshole thing to say. | ||||
| Register to Reply to This Post |
| | #5 | ||||
| ..... your a worthless poster Realist ![]() ![]()
| |||||
| Register to Reply to This Post |
| | #6 | ||||
| Better Dead than Red Democrat Where America Goes to Talk ![]()
| | ||||
| Register to Reply to This Post |
| | #7 | ||||
| Master Debator Election Moderator Democrat Omaha, NE ![]() ![]() ![]()
| I can't say that i would support edwards. Unfortunately the guy I like only raised like 4 or 6 million when Obama and Clinton raised 25. The other guy i like probably isnt going to run. If i was forced to choose between obama and clinton at this point i'd say obama. | ||||
| Register to Reply to This Post |
| | #8 | ||||
| helluo librorum The Lab Moderator Humanist Chicago Suburbs ![]() ![]()
| Originally Posted by 7960 So he's a dick for what the public perceives?
Where has he used her cancer as a political tool? They were very frank about the situation and I don't see how anyone can say he's using it for political gain. Step away from the keyboard for a few hours. | ||||
| Register to Reply to This Post |
| | #9 | ||||
| ..... your a worthless poster Realist ![]() ![]()
| Originally Posted by Scrum I watched and read the interviews. It's the impression I got from listening to him (and her) speak. Before those interviews I hadn't really thought much about him so I didn't have any preconceived ideas...I came away thinking "If my wife had cancer the last thing I'd do is put her through this." IMO his quest for presidency is as important to him as his wife is. That makes him 100% asshole.
| ||||
| Register to Reply to This Post |
| | #10 | ||||
| Master Debator Election Moderator Democrat Omaha, NE ![]() ![]() ![]()
| She said she/they were going to continue. He is not forcing the issue as she chose to keep going. Actually, I am sure it was a mutual decision between them as they are married. If he did want to use it as a political tool he would have probably done as 7960 suggests and released it later when it "mattered" or had the best chance for a last minute impact. I don't believe his support comes from people feeling sorry for him. While there might be a few out there that are sympathy supporters, I dont think they would amount to 1-2% of them. It was good for some national (and free) TV time, which is so incredibly important when running for any kind of office. | ||||
| Register to Reply to This Post |
| | #11 | ||||
| helluo librorum The Lab Moderator Humanist Chicago Suburbs ![]() ![]()
| Originally Posted by 7960
Originally Posted by 7960 Yea, you have a very open mind when it comes to Edwards.
Seriously, did you even listen to a word they said? | ||||
| Register to Reply to This Post |
| | #12 | ||||
| Never, never, never give up Conservative Party High Point, NC ![]()
| Edwards was a one term Senator in NC and was on his way to losing his seat because he sucked. Anyone that thinks he deserves to be president is a moron. Also, these stats are useless. How many days before the elections take place? 500+? | ||||
| Register to Reply to This Post |
| | #13 | ||||
| Lurker Independent ![]()
| In a general election Edwards might have a better chance to win than would Obama or Clinton. Edwards could likely win many or all of the southern states, which could be a key battleground area. I wouldn't have a clue how well Obama would do in the South in the general election. Tennessee almost voted for an African American senator in November, but he was fairly conservative. With Bush's unpopularity and eight Republican years the Democrats are in a good position to retake the White House. But it's far from a done deal. | ||||
| Register to Reply to This Post |
| | #14 | ||||
| ..... your a worthless poster Realist ![]() ![]()
| Originally Posted by Scrum Yes, I did listen to them. I'm telling you the impression I left with. I've formed most of my opinion of Edwards since the interviews, reading the paper and internet to get background on some of the candidates i was unfamiliar with. From what I've read Edwards is inconsequential..........and an ambulance chaser.
He can't win. He can use his status in the southern states as a bargaining tool for another candidate but he can't win on his own. IMO he'll hang on for a while but eventually throw his support/votes behind another candidate. | ||||
| Register to Reply to This Post |
| | #15 | ||||
| Lurker Independent ![]()
| Originally Posted by 7960 You might be right. But he did surprise some people with his campaign in 2004, including his debate with Chaney
He doesn't have much experience, but who does? | ||||
| Register to Reply to This Post |
| | #16 | ||||
| Master Debator Election Moderator Democrat Omaha, NE ![]() ![]() ![]()
| I think a lack of washington experience is something we kind of need. Those long term politicians have been bought and paid for by the system. We need a real "straight talk express" that will make popular and unpopular decisions to put our country before party. Raising taxes, cutting spending on things like pork out of welfare and pork out of the military. Each thing pisses off certain sections of society but we need to fix this place before it is to late. | ||||
| Register to Reply to This Post |
| | #17 | ||||
| Never, never, never give up Conservative Party High Point, NC ![]()
| Originally Posted by DosEquis I agree, but does it have to be a person that made his fortune by ambulance chasing?
And again, he was a shitty senator, why do people think he would be a good president??? | ||||
| Register to Reply to This Post |
| | #18 | ||||
| Master Debator Election Moderator Democrat Omaha, NE ![]() ![]() ![]()
| Oh, dont get me wrong. I dont think i would be able to support him for president either. I am kind of shocked he was able to get elected in a red state considering how liberal he is. Of the three current "front runners" if i absolutely had to pick one, i'd choose Obama. Joe Biden and Wes Clark are still my favorites though. Biden didn't raise much money and Clark hasn't even declared running. | ||||
| Register to Reply to This Post |
| | #19 | ||||
| Banned Progressive Philadelphia, PA ![]()
| Originally Posted by DosEquis Biden has some shady history, some racially insensitive comments he made that won't fly, and he's so senatorial it hurts to listen to a full lecture sometimes, and he can't raise any money...freakin Dodd outraised him...Dodd!
Richardson is a better version of him in pretty much every aspect Clark can't run now, Edwards/Obama/Hillary/Richardson have sucked up all the air Obama over Edwards? Obama doesn't even have a real healthcare plan yet, Edwards has had his basic plan for awhile, not to mention he leads the pack in many progressive things, like the first to pull out fox debates, first to recant his vote on Iraq, etc I dread the day when a journalist, probably unfairly, asks Obama about how he used cocaine as a teenager...prime time, presidential debate... I do not need another swift-boat collapse in my life Edwards has been through the run, as VP cand. we already know all the shit that's going to be thrown at him...weak stuff...and he's acting more energetic and tough this whole season...he's ready for the big race | ||||
| Register to Reply to This Post |
| | #20 |
| Master Debator Election Moderator |