AlterNet: War on Iraq: Majority of Iraqi Lawmakers Now Reject Occupation On Tuesday, without note in the U.S. media, more than half of the members of Iraq's parliament rejected the continuing occupation of their country. 144 lawmakers signed onto a legislative petition calling on the United States to set a ...
| | #1 | ||||
| Baka Idealist Adelaide, Australia ![]()
| Iraqi government to back withdrawl ? AlterNet: War on Iraq: Majority of Iraqi Lawmakers Now Reject Occupation
I don't see that the US has much choice if they want to maintain they have Iraqi government cooperation. | ||||
| Register to Reply to This Post |
| | #2 | ||||
| Political Genius Republican Yorba Linda Ca. ![]()
| If they can get an actual majority Vote I would say yes, we must comply. But when you are talking about a nonbinding petition being shoved in your face by "the Al Sadr movement" I wonder how realistic the signing was? They obviously all want us out. It is a question of doing it when the government can remain stable.
__________________ Sock It To Me! ![]() "Bureaucracy is a Parasite that Preys on Free Thought and Suffocates Free Spirit!" - Douglas Adams | ||||
| Register to Reply to This Post |
| | #3 | ||||
| Baka Idealist Adelaide, Australia ![]()
| Although this was non-binding it they did get a majority. I am not sure by what means they got the signatures. Further down in the article:
| ||||
| Register to Reply to This Post |
| | #4 | ||||
| America Fuck Yea Election Moderator Republican In Name Only ![]() ![]()
| of course al sadr wants us out of their | ||||
| Register to Reply to This Post |
| | #5 | ||||
| Baka Idealist Adelaide, Australia ![]()
| |||||
| Register to Reply to This Post |
| | #6 | ||||
| Unite for Dems or Liberty Dies Progressive Philadelphia, PA ![]() ![]()
| Al Sadr controls the Shia that gives the government votes more than anyone else, next election he'll pick up many more seats, Shia across Iraq link themselves to the Mahdi Army or Moqtada People don't understand how powerful he is... The only reason he isn't running the country is because he still has a quasi-deal with Maliki and since he's becoming more popular everyday he doesn't see a need to rush things, he's only in his 30s, he has decades to rule Iraq | ||||
| Register to Reply to This Post |
| | #7 | ||||
| Master Debator Election Moderator Democrat Omaha, NE ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
| The prime minister said today that he believes US soldiers need to be there 1 to 2 more years. Way to give the enemy a time table! | ||||
| Register to Reply to This Post |
| | #8 | ||||
| Unite for Dems or Liberty Dies Progressive Philadelphia, PA ![]() ![]()
| Originally Posted by DosEquis What he really means is:
We need 1-2 years to train our militias enough to wipe out the sunnis, and we need you wearing down the insurgents so they're ripe for the picking as we install our new Mahdi government that will fund terrorists We took a contained problem under strict UN inspections in 2003 and now we're giving money to a government that's going to train terrorists that will kill Americans (actually it already has) Basically Bush, Republicans and anyone who supported this war helped fund terrorists that killed and will kill Americans, fortunately for some thats short of treason | ||||
| Register to Reply to This Post |
| Register to Post a Reply |
| Bookmarks |
| Tags |
| timetable, iraq |
| ||||||
| Thread Tools | |
| |
| vBulletin 3.7.2 -- Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd. | Custom Artwork and Theme (TM) 2006, Liberty Lounge |