I'm going to be in the market to buy a new computer at some point in the near future and I'm definitely going to go with an Intel multi-core processor of some type, but I'm not really sure whether or not the quad stuff is worth it I want something ...
| |||||||
|
| Register to Post a Reply |
| | LinkBack | Thread Tools |
| | #1 | ||||
| ipsa Scientia Potestas est Pragmatist North Carolina ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
| Computer crew: Are "Quad Core" Intel processors worth the price? v.helpmebuildasystem I'm going to be in the market to buy a new computer at some point in the near future and I'm definitely going to go with an Intel multi-core processor of some type, but I'm not really sure whether or not the quad stuff is worth it I want something that's going to last and be able to handle apps and games for years to come, so.. what do you guys think? Newegg.com - Intel Core 2 Duo E6700 Conroe 2.66GHz 4M shared L2 Cache LGA 775 Processor - Retail Newegg.com - Intel Core 2 Quad Q6600 Kentsfield 2.4GHz 2 x 4MB L2 Cache LGA 775 Processor - Retail Also, what's the difference between these two? Newegg.com - Intel Core 2 Extreme QX6700 Kentsfield 2.66GHz 2 x 4MB L2 Cache LGA 775 Processor - Retail Newegg.com - Intel Core 2 Extreme X6800 Conroe 2.93GHz 4M shared L2 Cache LGA 775 Processor - Retail | ||||
| Register to Reply to This Post |
| | #2 | ||||
| Braccae tuae aperiuntur. Reform Party NJ ![]() ![]()
| Right now there's really no programs that use dual-core. Quad core is a bit further off. Bang for the buck value, they are not worth the price. They're both decent processors. That dual core scores better on gaming and video encoding, the quad core scores better on applications. It depends on what you're looking for. I would be more than satisfied with the 6600 to be honest. You can always upgrade in the future. Rather than paying $1000 on a processor pay $250 four times over the course of 4 years and you'll have a faster system overall. The 6700 isn't worth spending 50% more on your processor in my opinion. | ||||
| Register to Reply to This Post |
| | #3 | ||||
| tyop speicalist Religion Moderator Capitalist California ![]()
| Originally Posted by JaJae Multicores are useful if you do a lot work with a VM. That's one major purpose they serve.
I've been working with VMs for a few years now. I use them to develop custom Windows installations for companies. They serve as an alternative to Ghost images. Sadly, I do not have a multicore processor. I'm still using a wittle 2600+.
__________________ $$_/^_^\__*<}{~))}}""? ???? ![]() ? //\\ **!!]" | ||||
| Register to Reply to This Post |
| | #4 | ||||
| Friend to all. Socialist Maryland ![]() ![]()
| I am currently building a computer and I am using the Core 2 Duo. I figure that will split the difference per se between new and old technology. It won't be as obsolete as fast. Well, probably will...but I wanted to feel L33t. | ||||
| Register to Reply to This Post |
| | #5 | ||||
| Braccae tuae aperiuntur. Reform Party NJ ![]() ![]()
| Originally Posted by Dumpy Dooby That's true, but the average home user isn't running virtual machines. The 2600 overclocks like woah though. Those Socket As were fun. I'm using a s754 3700 right now and feeling the need to upgrade.
| ||||
| Register to Reply to This Post |
| | #6 | ||||
| tyop speicalist Religion Moderator Capitalist California ![]()
| Originally Posted by JaJae I got it because it can overclock to perform equivalent to a 3200+. It was the best bang for my buck at the time.
I'm falling far behind in the hardware world, though. I wish I had kept up to date. About the only thing I'm up to date on are drivers for the hardware. I guess that's a good thing. | ||||
| Register to Reply to This Post |
| | #7 | ||||
| tyop speicalist Religion Moderator Capitalist California ![]()
| Is the technology to the point where you can take a SLI board, hook up two cards, put in a quad core cpu, and then hook up four monitors have each processor and video output display a different OS? Obviously emulation of some sort would be needed. I don't care to actually do this. I'm really just curious to know if the technology is there yet. I've been out of the loop for a while. | ||||
| Register to Reply to This Post |
| | #8 | ||||
| Master Debator Election Moderator Democrat Omaha, NE ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
| I need to build a new pc, but i have to buy a new dock (500-800) and waterski (650-1100) first. The g/f wants an engagement ring ( ) for some reason too. | ||||
| Register to Reply to This Post |
| | #9 | ||||
| Friend to all. Socialist Maryland ![]() ![]()
| |||||
| Register to Reply to This Post |
| | #10 | ||||
| Ron Paul '08 Republican Queens, NY ![]()
| Originally Posted by Dumpy Dooby Yes and no.
There are programs capable (with the innovation of some very talented programmers I might add ), but they are so specialized you will not see them in general use. Or rather DD, you yourself would never have a need to run such highly-algorithmic applicaitons in the manner you've suggested. But yes -- they do exist. For up to 16 processors (per single system) I have seen a rendering program (3DSMAX) redistribute it's threads.
__________________ | ||||
| Register to Reply to This Post |
| | #11 | ||||
| Braccae tuae aperiuntur. Reform Party NJ ![]() ![]()
| Vista just dropped a lot of their support for virtual machines as well. So it seems we're gonna be stuck with Windows Server Edition for a while if that's your cup of tea. | ||||
| Register to Reply to This Post |
| | #12 | ||||
| tyop speicalist Religion Moderator Capitalist California ![]()
| I don't plan on using Vista any time soon. | ||||
| Register to Reply to This Post |
| | #13 | ||||
| Baka Idealist Adelaide, Australia ![]()
| I have a QX6700, and I like it. I also have 6GB of main memory and use Vista 64 , as my previous OS XP32 does not support all the memory | ||||
| Register to Reply to This Post |
| | #14 | ||||
| ipsa Scientia Potestas est Pragmatist North Carolina ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
| Hm, well.. I think it's probably between the first two, just not sure if the second one is worth an extra $200 What components would you guys recommend? Motherboard wise? I'm not up to date on what is the best.. I want something with onboard sound / ethernet, (and plenty of usb/firewire, but i think that's standard), other than that I'm not too picky.. aside from needing pci express obviously. Ram too? Probably 2g is all I'd need. edit: This is the mobo a lot of people are talking about on the processor reviews: Newegg.com - ASUS P5N32-SLI SE Deluxe LGA 775 NVIDIA nForce4 SLI x 16 ATX Intel Motherboard - Retail Last edited by motivez; 05-15-2007 at 04:34 AM. | ||||
| Register to Reply to This Post |
| | #15 | ||||
| Ron Paul '08 Republican Queens, NY ![]()
| Originally Posted by motivez Oh no not at all.
You want to look at the Intel BX2 (Bad Axe 2) Asus P5B DELUXE, or any of the brand-spankin-new 680i SLi chipsets (I suggest BFG 680i SLi). You can't go wrong with any of them, as a plus the Asus has onboard WiFi. edit: Here is a [Modular] Power Supply that can handle Quad Cores plus dual GFX cards in SLi if you choose to do so. It's getting rave reviews everywhere. (Newegg.com - CORSAIR CMPSU-620HX ATX12V) | ||||
| Register to Reply to This Post |
| | #16 | ||||
| Baka Idealist Adelaide, Australia ![]()
| I got the ASUS Striker Extreme, nice board, but very picky about RAM, which I have heard is somewhat related to the 680i chipset, but that may just be hersay | ||||
| Register to Reply to This Post |
| | #18 | ||||
| Ron Paul '08 Republican Queens, NY ![]()
| The case is a solid one. Literally, being steel it will weigh 50+ lbs when loaded with components. Forget the E6700 and go quad core for this high-end level system. I would suspect that case, with so many fans, will not be what you're after in terms of noise. Lian-Li is by far the highest quality computer case manufacturer out there right now. You should look into Lian-Li cases. PSU choice is excellent. But going with water cooling would add 3 hours to your build time and ~$300 to your overall cost. Bump down your 8800GTX to the non-factory-overclocked model and save yourself about $60. Overclock it yourself when you get it. Newegg.com - BFG Tech BFGR88768GTXOCE GeForce 8800GTX 768MB 384-bit GDDR3 PCI Express x16 OC HDCP Video Card - Retail edit: that RAM is crap btw, check your PM's for some sticks with much better latency timings. (You want only Micron D9 series chips) or this link Newegg.com - Buy Computer Parts, PC Components, Laptop Computers, Digital Cameras and more!) | ||||
| Register to Reply to This Post |