Michael Moore challengs Fred Thompson to a debate

[Donkey®]

Originally Posted by JaJae

That's not true. In the article I posted above it dates US media reporting on info from the CIA regarding Castro's Parkinson's as early as 1998. And I can probably find reports before then. And it wasn't just the CIA making the claims. A lot of people were including the media from within Cuba. The idea of Castro having Parkinson's isn't a new one and it wouldn't necessarily take spying on him for the CIA to build a case on it.

In a post 9/11 world a crippled man in Cuba likely isn't getting much attention. Hell we're not spying on people in the middle east we should be spying on. I doubt Castro is given much attention these days.

Rumors. Innuendo. That's hardly official. The report the CIA issued in 2005 was an OFFICIAL report. Why bother to release the official report 7 years later since it was so "well known" already? There's no logical reason to it except the fact that they had new information.


Fuck it. You guys are just arguing for the sake of arguing at this point. I have flooded this thread with documentation, articles, PROOF we spy on Castro. I have yet to see ONE bit of proof saying that policy changed. I'll go spin my wheels somewhere else.

[7960]

Originally Posted by Donkey®

So how would they, the CIA, get new evidence of such a personal nature?

By listening to and reading about what people who've met with him say.

On top of that, why would the CIA even be mentioning Castro at all? Could it possibly be the fact that they are spying? Maybe?

You need to define "spying".

How do you define it?