refuting popular mechanics 9/11 lies...?

[7960]

Originally Posted by Ardentfrost

(pics taken from the wrong side of the smaller building that fell doesn't prove anything),

I believe it does say something. They showed the wrong side of a building and said "see, no damage!" and then they were shown pictures of the damaged side and they're still parading their original pictures saying "see, no damage!"

They are knowingly lying, and IMO they're doing it because they have a conclusion and need their "facts" to be true even if they know their evidence is wrong.

[Ardentfrost]

Originally Posted by 7960

I believe it does say something. They showed the wrong side of a building and said "see, no damage!" and then they were shown pictures of the damaged side and they're still parading their original pictures saying "see, no damage!"

They are knowingly lying, and IMO they're doing it because they have a conclusion and need their "facts" to be true even if they know their evidence is wrong.

Yeah, they have the same logical problems that religious zealots have. They NEED certain things to be true or it interrupts their logic, and they simply can't deal with that.

What both groups need to understand is that you don't need every fact to be true to still think a certain way. If you think the government is responsible for 9/11, then that's fine. But if you're going to bring false information to the table, don't expect us to be convinced of your position.

[7960]

Originally Posted by Ardentfrost

Yeah, they have the same logical problems that religious zealots have. They NEED certain things to be true or it interrupts their logic, and they simply can't deal with that.

What both groups need to understand is that you don't need every fact to be true to still think a certain way. If you think the government is responsible for 9/11, then that's fine. But if you're going to bring false information to the table, don't expect us to be convinced of your position.

To date I have never given an opinion on whether the govt was involved. I've said I think al queda did it, I think muslim hijackers did it, I think there were no explosives in the towers, I think flight 77 hit the pentagon. People constantly think I'm sack-riding bush because those are what I believe, but none of that says anything about our govt's involvement even if "involved" just means foreknowledge.



(and with this post I once again have not said if I think our govt was involved )