Where does Ron Paul stand on all the issues? Ron Paul: wants to abolish the IRS; http://www.lewrockwell.com/paul/paul316.html is for the right to keep and bear arms; http://www.lewrockwell.com/paul/paul374.html is against entitlements; http://www.lewrockwell.com/paul/paul351.html on healthcare he is not for government involvement and is for lowering the cost of health care; http://www.lewrockwell.com/paul/paul345.html http://www.lewrockwell.com/paul/paul339.html ...
| |||||||
|
| Register to Post a Reply |
| | LinkBack (1) | Thread Tools |
| |
#1 | ||||
| The Fed Must Go! Paleolibertarian ![]()
| Where does Ron Paul stand on the issues? (Synopsis) Where does Ron Paul stand on all the issues? Ron Paul: wants to abolish the IRS; http://www.lewrockwell.com/paul/paul316.html is for the right to keep and bear arms; http://www.lewrockwell.com/paul/paul374.html is against entitlements; http://www.lewrockwell.com/paul/paul351.html on healthcare he is not for government involvement and is for lowering the cost of health care; http://www.lewrockwell.com/paul/paul345.html http://www.lewrockwell.com/paul/paul339.html on immigration he is for securing the borders and rejecting amnesty and against birthright citizenship; http://www.lewrockwell.com/paul/paul344.html http://www.lewrockwell.com/paul/paul322.html is for free trade, not subsidized trade and against the WTO; http://www.lewrockwell.com/paul/paul339.html http://www.lewrockwell.com/paul/paul250.html has a solution for soaring gas prices; http://www.lewrockwell.com/paul/paul322.html thinks abortion is not a Federal issue; http://www.lewrockwell.com/paul/paul301.html http://www.lewrockwell.com/paul/paul240.html is against the Patriot Act; http://www.lewrockwell.com/paul/paul264.html is against Federal funding of stem cell research; http://www.lewrockwell.com/paul/paul252.html is against the Federal marraige amendment and to protect marraige says curb the judiciary; http://www.lewrockwell.com/paul/paul240.html http://www.lewrockwell.com/paul/paul197.html is against the UN; http://www.lewrockwell.com/paul/paul190.html is against foreign aid; http://www.lewrockwell.com/paul/paul180.html is for Honest Money (Gold); http://www.lewrockwell.com/paul/paul118.html wants to abolish the department of Homeland Security; http://www.lewrockwell.com/paul/paul62.html wants to abolish the Fed; http://www.lewrockwell.com/paul/paul53.html introduced the THE FAMILY EDUCATION FREEDOM ACT allowing parents a non-public choice to educate their children; http://www.house.gov/paul/congrec/congrec2001/cr013101b.htm is for making the world safe for Christianity (not by meddling in Muslim countries where Christians were safer BEFORE said meddling); http://www.lewrockwell.com/paul/paul312.html on fixing what's wrong with Iraq; Fixing What’s Wrong With Iraq Hope this helps you understand what Ron Paul stands for. What I find fascinating about Ron Paul is there is not one candidate who has written as much as he has about defending the Constitution. Not one. Either party. If you are voting for Ron Paul, please copy this and send to all you can. Doug E.
__________________ "An unconstitutional act is not a law; it confers no rights; it imposes no duties; it affords no protection; it creates no office; it is in legal contemplation, as inoperative as though it had never been passed." Norton v. Shelby County, 118 US 425 (1885) Last edited by Fed Up; 05-22-2007 at 07:34 PM. | ||||
| Register to Reply to This Post |
| | #2 | ||||
| tyop speicalist Religion Moderator Capitalist California ![]()
| This thread receives a "Dumpy Dooby stamp of approval." I'm probably going to repost this in other places, if you don't mind. | ||||
| Register to Reply to This Post |
| | #3 | ||||
| Baka Idealist Adelaide, Australia ![]()
| Originally Posted by mywayfrank A nice thought, but unlikely to happen in the near future.
Originally Posted by mywayfrank Cannot say I agree with concept completely. I'm against government involvement in all the forms thus far.
Originally Posted by mywayfrank Changing the constitution isn't that easy, I doubt you would get the numbers required to remove birthright citizenship
No-one is ever for truly free trade Awesome Originally Posted by mywayfrank It does need protecting
While the UN is flawed, isolationism is more so Sounds archaic I'd rather the world be safe for rational people | ||||
| Register to Reply to This Post |
| | #4 | ||||
| America Fuck Yea Election Moderator Republican In Name Only ![]() ![]()
| against free trade and the UN and wants the gold standard | ||||
| Register to Reply to This Post |
| | #5 | ||||
| For those about to rock... libertarian Atlanta, GA ![]() ![]()
| who's against free trade? He's against free trade PACTS, and prefers free trade EVERYWHERE.
__________________ http://www.corruptapedia.com/ You can call me Aaron Burr the way I drop Hamiltons. | ||||
| Register to Reply to This Post |
| | #6 | ||||
| America Fuck Yea Election Moderator Republican In Name Only ![]() ![]()
| |||||
| Register to Reply to This Post |
| | #7 | ||||
| Baka Idealist Adelaide, Australia ![]()
| |||||
| Register to Reply to This Post |
| | #8 | ||||
| America Fuck Yea Election Moderator Republican In Name Only ![]() ![]()
| |||||
| Register to Reply to This Post |
| | #9 | ||||
| Liberty, now and forever Libertarian Party DFW ![]()
| Why? As long as it is a safe product, why regulate it?
__________________ “The sacred rights of mankind are not to be rummaged for among old parchments or musty records. They are written, as with a sunbeam, in the whole volume of human nature, by the hand of the divinity itself; and can never be erased.” --Alexander Hamilton-- | ||||
| Register to Reply to This Post |
| | #10 | ||||
| America Fuck Yea Election Moderator Republican In Name Only ![]() ![]()
| safety is one of the reasons to regulate but we also need agreements to protect our country's interests. What happens if they start dumping their product in our markets, and because of their economic planning we cannot compete with that. That is a problem. Environmental issues don't stop at borders either. We need to have an arena for countries to discuss trading between them | ||||
| Register to Reply to This Post |
| | #11 | ||||
| Anti-War, Anti-State, Pro-Free Market Capitalist ![]()
| He's completely for free trade. He's against these "free trade" agreements that hurt our economy and sovereignty, such as NAFTA. The UN is a cesspool of corruption and we should be out of it. He's not for "the gold standard" necessarily, he is for competition in the market for money. He is for dollars, gold, silver, etc competing to see which is the best currency. | ||||
| Register to Reply to This Post |
| | #12 | ||||
| Baka Idealist Adelaide, Australia ![]()
| |||||
| Register to Reply to This Post |
| | #13 | ||||
| Baka Idealist Adelaide, Australia ![]()
| Originally Posted by kinggovernor Then don't. Artificial price hikes FTL
| ||||
| Register to Reply to This Post |
| | #14 | ||||
| Master Debator Election Moderator Democrat Omaha, NE ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
| |||||
| Register to Reply to This Post |
| | #15 | ||||
| For those about to rock... libertarian Atlanta, GA ![]() ![]()
| |||||
| Register to Reply to This Post |
| | #16 | ||||
| The Fed Must Go! Paleolibertarian ![]()
| Along the same humor lines... The Real Reasons Why They Hate Us The Real Reasons Why They Hate Us by Bill Barnwell | ||||
| Register to Reply to This Post |
| | #17 | ||||
| Political Genius Republican Yorba Linda Ca. ![]()
| Originally Posted by lew
Ron Paul in the US House of Representatives, July 25, 2003 Mr. Speaker, I rise to introduce the Honest Money Act. The Honest Money Act repeals legal tender laws, a.k.a. forced tender laws, that compel American citizens to accept fiat (arbitrary) irredeemable paper-ticket or electronic money as their unit of account. Absent legal tender laws, individuals acting through the markets, rather than government dictates, determine what is to be used as money. Historically, the free-market choice for money has been some combination of gold and silver, whenever they were available. As Dr. Edwin Vieira, the nation’s top expert on constitutional money, states: “A free market functions most efficiently and most fairly when the market determines the quality and the quantity of money that’s being used.” While fiat money is widely accepted thanks to legal tender laws, it does not maintain its purchasing power. This works to the disadvantage of ordinary people who lose the purchasing power of their savings, pensions, annuities, and other promises of future payment. Most importantly, because of the subsidies our present monetary system provides to banks, which, as Federal Reserve Chairman Alan Greenspan has stated, “induces” the financial sector to increase leverage, the Federal Reserve can create additional money, in Mr. Greenspan’s words, “without limit.” For this reason, absent legal tender laws, many citizens would refuse to accept fiat irredeemable paper-ticket or electronic money. __________________________________________________ _____________ He has a clear record and a clean conscious on this issue. And I agree 100% I don't get why the young protestors ranting about the big evil corporations don't know more about how our financial systems work to our disadvantage and have real measurable harm on most people who try to save or invest. You are not forced to buy a can of Coca Cola but you can't do anything without working with a manipulated money supply and they aren't doing you any favors! The value of Gold and Silver is that they keep up with inflation in value.
__________________ Sock It To Me! ![]() "Bureaucracy is a Parasite that Preys on Free Thought and Suffocates Free Spirit!" - Douglas Adams | ||||
| Register to Reply to This Post |