Originally Posted by thomez calling someone names is not slanderous, you still fail to understand what slander is and what it means THREATING... sheesh....
| |||||||
|
| Register to Post a Reply |
| | LinkBack | Thread Tools |
| | #101 | ||||
| no es mi culpa Independent Beantown ![]()
| Originally Posted by thomez
THREATING... sheesh.
__________________ There is small disproportion betwixt a fool who useth not wit because he hath it not and him that useth it not when it should avail him. | ||||
| Register to Reply to This Post |
| | #102 | ||||
| no es mi culpa Independent Beantown ![]()
|
i said a threat OR slander. | ||||
| Register to Reply to This Post |
| | #103 | ||||
| no es mi culpa Independent Beantown ![]()
| |||||
| Register to Reply to This Post |
| | #104 | ||||
| Hamiltonian > Jeffersonian Libertarian Party DFW ![]()
| Originally Posted by Linzyhop If I were a Satanist, I'd be immensely offended and consider it swearing at me to say "God Bless You" to me.
And as I've already posted in this thread: Originally Posted by Publius
__________________ “The sacred rights of mankind are not to be rummaged for among old parchments or musty records. They are written, as with a sunbeam, in the whole volume of human nature, by the hand of the divinity itself; and can never be erased.” --Alexander Hamilton-- | ||||
| Register to Reply to This Post |
| | #105 | ||||
| Hamiltonian > Jeffersonian Libertarian Party DFW ![]()
| |||||
| Register to Reply to This Post |
| | #106 | ||||
| no es mi culpa Independent Beantown ![]()
| |||||
| Register to Reply to This Post |
| | #107 | ||||
| Pinko Commie Bastard Communist Moscow ![]()
| Originally Posted by Linzyhop you can go on as long as you want, but you are still going to be wrong, because you do not understand what slander is
__________________ Perhaps the sentiments contained in the preceding post, are not yet sufficiently favorable to procure them general favor; a long habit of not thinking a thing wrong, gives it a superficial appearance of being right, and raises at first a formidable outcry in defence of custom. But the tumult soon subsides. Time makes more converts than reason. - slightly modified from Common Sense, Thomas Paine, 1776 I am Ron Paul, Congressman from Texas... I am the champion of the Constitution. | ||||
| Register to Reply to This Post |
| | #108 | ||||
| Hamiltonian > Jeffersonian Libertarian Party DFW ![]()
| Originally Posted by Linzyhop When did I ever say "if you go up to a teacher/administrator at the mall and say fuck you you stupid whore" ?? I said if you go up to them and tell them "fuck off" or "go fuck yourself"
Neither is a slanderous statement, now you're just trying to put words in my mouth in order to bolster your argument. | ||||
| Register to Reply to This Post |
| | #109 | ||||
| no es mi culpa Independent Beantown ![]()
| Originally Posted by Publius i didn't say you said it. i said it. i'm saying if you say that to a teacher, being a student, you can STILL get in trouble for it. it's malicious and vulgar.
if you weren't a student, i'm sure the teacher, if he/she choose, could still bring some sort of charges against you. dont' know if they'd hold, but they could. slanderous statements include malicious intent. telling someone to fuck off is malicious. dont' know if it would hold water in court, but it is. | ||||
| Register to Reply to This Post |
| | #110 | ||||
| Pinko Commie Bastard Communist Moscow ![]()
| saying that "fuck off" is slander is like saying that punching someone is rape, because they both involve malicious intent | ||||
| Register to Reply to This Post |
| | #111 | ||||
| tyop speicalist Religion Moderator Capitalist California ![]()
| Originally Posted by Linzyhop That doesn't make it slanderous, which is where your argument seemed to have been hinged.
__________________ $$_/^_^\__*<}{~))}}""? ???? ![]() ? //\\ **!!]" | ||||
| Register to Reply to This Post |
| | #112 | ||||
| tyop speicalist Religion Moderator Capitalist California ![]()
| Originally Posted by Publius
I love this. Originally Posted by Publius Most Satanists view themselves as gods. They don't view themselves as literal deities, but they view themselves as the sole contributor to their actions, and there are no other forces that incite any direct causality for their actions. They call themselves gods. They are atheists though, and they view worship as being rather pathetic. Oh, and CoS has some LaVeyan teachings regarding the human ego. It's pretty common for Satanists to be incredibly self-absorbed, and this is a virtuous attribute to them. So in most cases, they wouldn't consider it swearing, but they might be more likely to find it laughable and silly.
That was a tangent, I know, but I figured I'd point it out anyway in case you were interested. | ||||
| Register to Reply to This Post |
| | #113 | ||||
| no es mi culpa Independent Beantown ![]()
| |||||
| Register to Reply to This Post |
| | #114 | ||||
| tyop speicalist Religion Moderator Capitalist California ![]()
| Originally Posted by Linzyhop The linguistic definition of "person" doesn't include "large conglomerate overseen by a board of directors whose job is to please their shareholders," but yet, the law considers corporations to be "Persons."
Case in point: Legal terms have legal definitions. So what's the legal definition of slander? Well, I have a copy of Black's Law Dictionary, 2nd Edition right here... Slander: In torts: Oral defamation; the speaking of false and malicious words concerning another, whereby injury results to his reputation. Slanderer: One who maliciously and without reason imputes a crime or fault to another of which he is innocent. | ||||
| Register to Reply to This Post |
| Register to Post a Reply |
| Bookmarks |
| Tags |
| free speech, faith based programs, drugs |
| ||||||
| Thread Tools | |
| |
| vBulletin 3.7.2 -- Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd. | Custom Artwork and Theme (TM) 2006, Liberty Lounge |