China executes ex-food and drug chief By ALEXA OLESEN, Associated Press Writer 34 minutes ago China executed the former head of its food and drug watchdog on Tuesday for approving untested medicine in exchange for cash, the strongest signal yet from Beijing that it is serious about tackling its product ...
| | #1 | ||||
| Braccae tuae aperiuntur. Reform Party NJ ![]() ![]()
| China executes food and drug administrator
Cliffs: FDA Chief steals money and pushes through false drugs. China executes him. This is a unique execution. In America, I doubt he would have been put to death. What do you guys think about his execution, good or bad? I think it sets a strong message to not do things like this and he was responsible for the deaths of many. I wouldn't be opposed to an American committing the same crime getting the death penalty, but I'm not sure I would push for it.
__________________ No good decision was ever made in a swivel chair. Senate Majority Leader, Harry Reid: As we look back in history, the Founding Fathers would be cringing to hear people talking about eliminating earmarks. | ||||
| Register to Reply to This Post |
| | #2 | ||||
| no es mi culpa Independent Beantown ![]()
| this is why communism works in some countries. they don't put up with shit that more democratic societies would tolerate (at least not putting him to death)... although personally I think it's sweet justice.
__________________ There is small disproportion betwixt a fool who useth not wit because he hath it not and him that useth it not when it should avail him. | ||||
| Register to Reply to This Post |
| | #3 | ||||
| Braccae tuae aperiuntur. Reform Party NJ ![]() ![]()
| |||||
| Register to Reply to This Post |
| | #4 | ||||
| For those about to rock... libertarian Atlanta, GA ![]() ![]()
| Umm... I mean, that's very overkill. However, it is testament that they are not out to poison America and whatnot. However, this certainly isn't an advantage of communism over capitalism/democracy. It doesn't matter what type of government you have, people in governmental positions of power with little to no oversight is a bad idea. | ||||
| Register to Reply to This Post |
| | #5 | ||||
| George W Bush, God's Tool Independent ny ![]() ![]() ![]()
| Originally Posted by JaJae In America the worst that would happen is the FDA chief would be forced to resign, there is a real lack of accountability going on in our government (it been this way for years - both democrats and republicans), very few offenders get punished because government is so huge bureaucratically (and its process) it is almost impossible to know exactly who did what and of course they would not be forthcoming with info (see alberto gonzo and the justice department). Execution is a bit much though.
Its funny that we let government set the moral compass when they don't practice was they preach. Its either because they feel WE must be at a higher standard in order for society to function properly or they use it as a way of control, telling us what is the right thing to do. The former reason (that we should be held higher) makes no sense because it can be argued quite well that they as the leaders have much more power and influence that we can ever have (as individuals) and what they do has a greater impact therefore they should be held to a higher standard. As for the other reason, that of control, well that seems me as more of an unconscious thing rather than a consciouses one, they feel that are in a position to make things better the way THEY see it - consequently that means we must give up some power to them to allow them to do such things but unfortunately the road to ruin has alway been paved with good intentions. Either way accountability is paramount
__________________
| ||||
| Register to Reply to This Post |
| | #6 | ||||
| Common Sense Conservative Realist ![]()
| Originally Posted by Ardentfrost How was it overkill? He knowingly allowed deadly products into the market, when it was his job to stop them, so that he could make a buck. As a result, a lot of completely innocent people died.
He's worse than a lot of murders we execute in America. Just because he kills with a suit and tie on doesn't make him any less culpable. | ||||
| Register to Reply to This Post |
| | #7 | ||||
| Political Genius Republican Yorba Linda Ca. ![]()
| Originally Posted by Linzyhop
I know I feel better! ![]() But I never did get sick either....... How about another form of incentive? When you have a market with many products and don't have to buy government brand X no matter how shitty most people will "not" buy the brand that poisons people or even dogs. Works every time!
__________________ Sock It To Me! ![]() "Bureaucracy is a Parasite that Preys on Free Thought and Suffocates Free Spirit!" - Douglas Adams | ||||
| Register to Reply to This Post |
| | #8 | ||||
| For those about to rock... libertarian Atlanta, GA ![]() ![]()
| Originally Posted by SpicyMcVoodoo I guess if you think a penalty of death should be handed out willy nilly, then ok. He wasn't the only person involved in the poisoning though. I could see imprisonment since people died... if they hadn't, just for accepting money I could see fines. But put to death when he wasn't directly making the poisonous materials?
![]() Seems overkill to me. | ||||
| Register to Reply to This Post |
| | #9 | ||||
| Friend to all. Socialist Maryland ![]() ![]()
| I guess the next time China is accused of lax policies we'll remember this. | ||||
| Register to Reply to This Post |
| | #10 | ||||
| Baka Idealist Adelaide, Australia ![]()
| I am opposed to execution as an archaic method of dealing with problems. Obviously this corruption was not sanctioned | ||||
| Register to Reply to This Post |
| | #11 | ||||
| Administrator libertarian Oklahoma ![]()
| I have mixed feelings about this. If for examples someone in the US pushed through a weightloss drug for example due to kickbacks. Lets say the drug when taken as prescribed via the bottle never killed someone but some folks were OD'ing and then the FDA official were busted I would NOT be for the death penalty. Why? Because those dieing would be using the drug improperly to begin with. I would OD on vitamins if I wanted, that wouldn't be someone else's fault. If however, people were dieing taking the recommended dosage of such a drug I do not think I would be against the death penalty... | ||||
| Register to Reply to This Post |
| | #12 | ||||
| Common Sense Conservative Realist ![]()
| Originally Posted by 6SpeedTA95 For example, 10 babies died of malnutrition because they were fed baby formula which had no nutritional value. That's pretty friggin despicable.
| ||||
| Register to Reply to This Post |
| | #13 | ||||
| ipsa Scientia Potestas est Pragmatist North Carolina ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
| China executes way too many people IMO, but I don't know that I have a problem with this guy, as he essentially contributed directly to the deaths of many people.. putting the lives of so many people in danger is one of the more "reasonable" applications of the death penalty. Originally Posted by Ardentfrost
| ||||
| Register to Reply to This Post |
| Register to Post a Reply |
| Bookmarks |
| Tags |
| food, execute, drug, china |
| ||||||
| Thread Tools | |
| |
| vBulletin 3.7.4 -- Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd. | Custom Artwork and Theme (TM) 2006, Liberty Lounge |