Schoolgirl loses "virginity ring" battle - Yahoo! News LONDON (Reuters) - A teen-ager whose teachers had stopped her wearing a "purity ring" at school to symbolize her commitment to virginity lost a High Court fight against the ban Monday Lydia Playfoot, 16, says her silver ring is an expression of ...
| | #1 | ||||
| Dirty Liberal Democrat South Jersey ![]() ![]() ![]()
| This sort of news makes me glad I live in the US Schoolgirl loses "virginity ring" battle - Yahoo! News
| ||||
| Register to Reply to This Post |
| | #2 | ||||
| no es mi culpa Independent Beantown ![]()
| oppression? it's a school. school's have the right to tell you what you can't and can not wear. If she can't wear her chastity ring, other's can't wear their pentagrams or hand of Muhammad's. I love how the Christians in this story think it's directed completely at them.
__________________ There is small disproportion betwixt a fool who useth not wit because he hath it not and him that useth it not when it should avail him. | ||||
| Register to Reply to This Post |
| | #3 | ||||
| Dirty Liberal Democrat South Jersey ![]() ![]() ![]()
| Originally Posted by Linzyhop yeah but we allow freedom of expression in our country. This is the equivalent to the black arm bands worn by students protesting vietnam.
| ||||
| Register to Reply to This Post |
| | #4 | ||||
| no es mi culpa Independent Beantown ![]()
| Originally Posted by WickedLou9 um i went to catholic school growing up and we weren't allowed to wear any jewelry period. It's not really a "freedom of expression" issue. it's a rule of the school with no exceptions. If they make it universal I don't see an issue.
| ||||
| Register to Reply to This Post |
| | #5 | ||||
| Common Sense Conservative Realist ![]()
| What's next? Full burqas in driver's license pictures? "But my faith says so!" is a shitty argument. Your faith doesn't give you carte blanche to break society's rules. | ||||
| Register to Reply to This Post |
| | #6 | ||||
| Dirty Liberal Democrat South Jersey ![]() ![]() ![]()
| Private school yes, but not in a public school. | ||||
| Register to Reply to This Post |
| | #7 | ||||
| For those about to rock... libertarian Atlanta, GA ![]() ![]()
| See, I say that too... if a school is going to be public (gov't run) and compulsory, then it must follow the rules of the gov't that runs it. But a lot of people don't like that, because it makes it difficult for a public school to have rules. I just say it's another reason to go private (vouchers). Then you get to choose a school, and if they have a rule you don't like, you can choose another one.
__________________ http://www.corruptapedia.com/ You can call me Aaron Burr the way I drop Hamiltons. | ||||
| Register to Reply to This Post |
| | #8 | ||||
| no es mi culpa Independent Beantown ![]()
| |||||
| Register to Reply to This Post |
| | #9 | ||||
| Common Sense Conservative Realist ![]()
| Originally Posted by Ardentfrost What is so unreasonable about not allowing people to wear jewelry?
Reason # 520934324038 why many of America's public schools are a joke is because the students don't take school seriously. Part of that is because they come to school dressed like they're going out to the club, thugged out, etc. Almost every work place, public or private, has a dress code. Why should school be any different? | ||||
| Register to Reply to This Post |
| | #10 | ||||
| For those about to rock... libertarian Atlanta, GA ![]() ![]()
| Originally Posted by SpicyMcVoodoo Because you have to be there, you have no choice, the government will come and take you (well, the parents) to jail if you do not.
| ||||
| Register to Reply to This Post |
| | #11 | ||||
| Common Sense Conservative Realist ![]()
| |||||
| Register to Reply to This Post |
| | #12 | ||||
| Dirty Liberal Democrat South Jersey ![]() ![]() ![]()
| Obviously there has to be some level of regulation. LIke they don't want kids coming to school naked or wearing nazi hate uniforms and stuff. But a plain silver ring? come on now. The girl was wearing a plain silver ring. it didn't have any offensive symbols or anything controversial. | ||||
| Register to Reply to This Post |
| | #13 | ||||
| Common Sense Conservative Realist ![]()
| Originally Posted by WickedLou9 Who should be the arbiter of what's appropriate or controversial? Why not just disallow jewelry?
| ||||
| Register to Reply to This Post |
| | #14 | ||||
| For those about to rock... libertarian Atlanta, GA ![]() ![]()
| |||||
| Register to Reply to This Post |
| | #15 | ||||
| Baka Idealist Adelaide, Australia ![]()
| The school probably does it to maintain a level playing field as such, I don't agree with the concept entirely | ||||
| Register to Reply to This Post |
| | #16 | ||||
| Common Sense Conservative Realist ![]()
| You get into free speech problems then. If you start naming specific subjects that cannot be put on clothing or jewelry, or if you have teachers making ad hoc calls about which statements or subjects are inappropriate, then you're going to get sued. If you just make a neutral, blanket rule that says no jewelery at all, then you don't get yourself in trouble. | ||||
| Register to Reply to This Post |
| | #17 | ||||
| For those about to rock... libertarian Atlanta, GA ![]() ![]()
| Originally Posted by SpicyMcVoodoo When I say you can't draw lines in the sand, I mean the kids should be able to do anything that is legal. As soon as you take away the aspect of forcefully making children go to the school (either through vouchers, or by no longer requiring school by law), then the school can require whatever it wants.
| ||||
| Register to Reply to This Post |
| | #18 | ||||
| minor irritant &/or non-entity News Moderator Contrarian Birmingham, UK ![]()
| ok i'm fairly certain that the school allows some 'religiously required' jewelry. which was the basis of this girls claim. however its not a tenet of christianity to wear silver rings to symbolise a committment to pre-marriage chasity, (quite the opposite in fact) as such her claim is seen as a form of low grade racism by some. OTOH i've heard comments decrying her actions that seem based around distaste for was that are seen as typically 'American', (& thus by extension somewhat undesirable) WL: good to see you back btw Last edited by avsp; 07-19-2007 at 10:59 AM.. | ||||
| Register to Reply to This Post |
| Register to Post a Reply |
| Bookmarks |
| Tags |
| freedom of expression |
| ||||||
| Thread Tools | |
| |
| vBulletin 3.7.4 -- Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd. | Custom Artwork and Theme (TM) 2006, Liberty Lounge |