Go Back   The Liberty Lounge Political Forums > Liberty Lounge Discussions > International Politics

Political Forum Click HERE to register your free account and become a member of our community today!
Register to Post a Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 07-18-2007, 04:29 PM   #1
Dirty Liberal
 
WickedLou9's Avatar

Democrat
South Jersey
WickedLou9 Has a place in history!WickedLou9 Has a place in history!WickedLou9 Has a place in history!

This sort of news makes me glad I live in the US

Schoolgirl loses "virginity ring" battle - Yahoo! News
LONDON (Reuters) - A teen-ager whose teachers had stopped her wearing a "purity ring" at school to symbolize her commitment to virginity lost a High Court fight against the ban Monday
Lydia Playfoot, 16, says her silver ring is an expression of her faith and had argued in court that it should be exempt from school regulations banning the wearing of jewelry.
"I am very disappointed by the decision this morning by the High Court not to allow me to wear my purity ring to school as an expression of my Christian faith not to have sex outside marriage," Playfoot said in a statement.
Why do they tolerate that sort of opression? It's not like this is a 3rd world country or communist China.. It's England.
 
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Stumble Upon this Post!
Register to Reply to This Post
Old 07-18-2007, 04:48 PM   #2
no es mi culpa
 
Linzyhop's Avatar

Independent
Beantown
Linzyhop is a jewel in the rough

oppression?

it's a school. school's have the right to tell you what you can't and can not wear. If she can't wear her chastity ring, other's can't wear their pentagrams or hand of Muhammad's.

I love how the Christians in this story think it's directed completely at them.
__________________
There is small disproportion betwixt a fool who
useth not wit because he hath it not and him
that useth it not when it should avail him.
 
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Stumble Upon this Post!
Register to Reply to This Post
Old 07-18-2007, 05:07 PM   #3
Dirty Liberal
 
WickedLou9's Avatar

Democrat
South Jersey
WickedLou9 Has a place in history!WickedLou9 Has a place in history!WickedLou9 Has a place in history!

Originally Posted by Linzyhop View Post
oppression?

it's a school. school's have the right to tell you what you can't and can not wear. If she can't wear her chastity ring, other's can't wear their pentagrams or hand of Muhammad's.

I love how the Christians in this story think it's directed completely at them.
yeah but we allow freedom of expression in our country. This is the equivalent to the black arm bands worn by students protesting vietnam.
 
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Stumble Upon this Post!
Register to Reply to This Post
Old 07-18-2007, 05:22 PM   #4
no es mi culpa
 
Linzyhop's Avatar

Independent
Beantown
Linzyhop is a jewel in the rough

Originally Posted by WickedLou9 View Post
yeah but we allow freedom of expression in our country. This is the equivalent to the black arm bands worn by students protesting vietnam.
um i went to catholic school growing up and we weren't allowed to wear any jewelry period. It's not really a "freedom of expression" issue. it's a rule of the school with no exceptions. If they make it universal I don't see an issue.
 
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Stumble Upon this Post!
Register to Reply to This Post
Old 07-18-2007, 05:25 PM   #5
Common Sense Conservative
 
SpicyMcVoodoo's Avatar

Realist
SpicyMcVoodoo is a Member of the House

What's next? Full burqas in driver's license pictures?

"But my faith says so!" is a shitty argument. Your faith doesn't give you carte blanche to break society's rules.
 
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Stumble Upon this Post!
Register to Reply to This Post
Old 07-18-2007, 05:26 PM   #6
Dirty Liberal
 
WickedLou9's Avatar

Democrat
South Jersey
WickedLou9 Has a place in history!WickedLou9 Has a place in history!WickedLou9 Has a place in history!

Originally Posted by Linzyhop View Post
um i went to catholic school growing up and we weren't allowed to wear any jewelry period. It's not really a "freedom of expression" issue. it's a rule of the school with no exceptions. If they make it universal I don't see an issue.
Private school yes, but not in a public school.
 
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Stumble Upon this Post!
Register to Reply to This Post
Old 07-18-2007, 05:35 PM   #7
For those about to rock...
 
Ardentfrost's Avatar

libertarian
Atlanta, GA
Ardentfrost is the Vice President!Ardentfrost is the Vice President!

Originally Posted by WickedLou9 View Post
Private school yes, but not in a public school.
See, I say that too... if a school is going to be public (gov't run) and compulsory, then it must follow the rules of the gov't that runs it. But a lot of people don't like that, because it makes it difficult for a public school to have rules.

I just say it's another reason to go private (vouchers). Then you get to choose a school, and if they have a rule you don't like, you can choose another one.
__________________
http://www.corruptapedia.com/

You can call me Aaron Burr the way I drop Hamiltons.
 
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Stumble Upon this Post!
Register to Reply to This Post
Old 07-18-2007, 05:36 PM   #8
no es mi culpa
 
Linzyhop's Avatar

Independent
Beantown
Linzyhop is a jewel in the rough

Originally Posted by WickedLou9 View Post
Private school yes, but not in a public school.
sounds like a private school to me.

Millais School - There Are No Limits
 
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Stumble Upon this Post!
Register to Reply to This Post
Old 07-18-2007, 05:41 PM   #9
Common Sense Conservative
 
SpicyMcVoodoo's Avatar

Realist
SpicyMcVoodoo is a Member of the House

Originally Posted by Ardentfrost View Post
See, I say that too... if a school is going to be public (gov't run) and compulsory, then it must follow the rules of the gov't that runs it. But a lot of people don't like that, because it makes it difficult for a public school to have rules.

I just say it's another reason to go private (vouchers). Then you get to choose a school, and if they have a rule you don't like, you can choose another one.
What is so unreasonable about not allowing people to wear jewelry?

Reason # 520934324038 why many of America's public schools are a joke is because the students don't take school seriously. Part of that is because they come to school dressed like they're going out to the club, thugged out, etc.

Almost every work place, public or private, has a dress code. Why should school be any different?
 
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Stumble Upon this Post!
Register to Reply to This Post
Old 07-18-2007, 05:59 PM   #10
For those about to rock...
 
Ardentfrost's Avatar

libertarian
Atlanta, GA
Ardentfrost is the Vice President!Ardentfrost is the Vice President!

Originally Posted by SpicyMcVoodoo View Post
What is so unreasonable about not allowing people to wear jewelry?

Reason # 520934324038 why many of America's public schools are a joke is because the students don't take school seriously. Part of that is because they come to school dressed like they're going out to the club, thugged out, etc.

Almost every work place, public or private, has a dress code. Why should school be any different?
Because you have to be there, you have no choice, the government will come and take you (well, the parents) to jail if you do not.
 
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Stumble Upon this Post!
Register to Reply to This Post
Old 07-18-2007, 06:35 PM   #11
Common Sense Conservative
 
SpicyMcVoodoo's Avatar

Realist
SpicyMcVoodoo is a Member of the House

Originally Posted by Ardentfrost View Post
Because you have to be there, you have no choice, the government will come and take you (well, the parents) to jail if you do not.
So because public education is compulsory, there should be no restrictions on dress at school? How does one follow from the other?
 
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Stumble Upon this Post!
Register to Reply to This Post
Old 07-18-2007, 06:37 PM   #12
Dirty Liberal
 
WickedLou9's Avatar

Democrat
South Jersey
WickedLou9 Has a place in history!WickedLou9 Has a place in history!WickedLou9 Has a place in history!

Originally Posted by SpicyMcVoodoo View Post
So because public education is compulsory, there should be no restrictions on dress at school? How does one follow from the other?
Obviously there has to be some level of regulation. LIke they don't want kids coming to school naked or wearing nazi hate uniforms and stuff. But a plain silver ring? come on now. The girl was wearing a plain silver ring. it didn't have any offensive symbols or anything controversial.
 
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Stumble Upon this Post!
Register to Reply to This Post
Old 07-18-2007, 06:57 PM   #13
Common Sense Conservative
 
SpicyMcVoodoo's Avatar

Realist
SpicyMcVoodoo is a Member of the House

Originally Posted by WickedLou9 View Post
Obviously there has to be some level of regulation. LIke they don't want kids coming to school naked or wearing nazi hate uniforms and stuff. But a plain silver ring? come on now. The girl was wearing a plain silver ring. it didn't have any offensive symbols or anything controversial.
Who should be the arbiter of what's appropriate or controversial? Why not just disallow jewelry?
 
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Stumble Upon this Post!
Register to Reply to This Post
Old 07-18-2007, 07:30 PM   #14
For those about to rock...
 
Ardentfrost's Avatar

libertarian
Atlanta, GA
Ardentfrost is the Vice President!Ardentfrost is the Vice President!

Originally Posted by SpicyMcVoodoo View Post
Who should be the arbiter of what's appropriate or controversial?
Which is why you can't draw lines in the sand.
 
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Stumble Upon this Post!
Register to Reply to This Post
Old 07-18-2007, 08:10 PM   #15
Baka
 
Kytro's Avatar

Idealist
Adelaide, Australia
Kytro is a jewel in the rough

The school probably does it to maintain a level playing field as such, I don't agree with the concept entirely
 
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Stumble Upon this Post!
Register to Reply to This Post
Old 07-18-2007, 09:02 PM   #16
Common Sense Conservative
 
SpicyMcVoodoo's Avatar

Realist
SpicyMcVoodoo is a Member of the House

Originally Posted by Ardentfrost View Post
Which is why you can't draw lines in the sand.
You get into free speech problems then. If you start naming specific subjects that cannot be put on clothing or jewelry, or if you have teachers making ad hoc calls about which statements or subjects are inappropriate, then you're going to get sued. If you just make a neutral, blanket rule that says no jewelery at all, then you don't get yourself in trouble.
 
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Stumble Upon this Post!
Register to Reply to This Post
Old 07-18-2007, 09:56 PM   #17
For those about to rock...
 
Ardentfrost's Avatar

libertarian
Atlanta, GA
Ardentfrost is the Vice President!Ardentfrost is the Vice President!

Originally Posted by SpicyMcVoodoo View Post
You get into free speech problems then. If you start naming specific subjects that cannot be put on clothing or jewelry, or if you have teachers making ad hoc calls about which statements or subjects are inappropriate, then you're going to get sued. If you just make a neutral, blanket rule that says no jewelery at all, then you don't get yourself in trouble.
When I say you can't draw lines in the sand, I mean the kids should be able to do anything that is legal. As soon as you take away the aspect of forcefully making children go to the school (either through vouchers, or by no longer requiring school by law), then the school can require whatever it wants.
 
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Stumble Upon this Post!
Register to Reply to This Post
Old 07-19-2007, 09:40 AM   #18
minor irritant &/or non-entity
News Moderator

Contrarian
Birmingham, UK
avsp is a Member of the House

ok i'm fairly certain that the school allows some 'religiously required' jewelry.

which was the basis of this girls claim. however its not a tenet of christianity to wear silver rings to symbolise a committment to pre-marriage chasity, (quite the opposite in fact)

as such her claim is seen as a form of low grade racism by some.

OTOH i've heard comments decrying her actions that seem based around distaste for was that are seen as typically 'American', (& thus by extension somewhat undesirable)

WL: good to see you back btw

Last edited by avsp; 07-19-2007 at 10:59 AM..
 
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Stumble Upon this Post!
Register to Reply to This Post
Register to Post a Reply

Bookmarks

Tags
freedom of expression

Go Back   The Liberty Lounge Political Forums > Liberty Lounge Discussions > International Politics



Thread Tools



SEO by vBSEO

vBulletin 3.7.4 -- Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd. Custom Artwork and Theme (TM) 2006, Liberty Lounge