I think the percentage wouldn't be very high if the people sufficiently educated themselves on the potential negative side effects of the druid. You can't find drugs just as easy as alcohol because you have to seek out shady people in order to get drugs most of the time because ...
| |||||||
|
| Register to Post a Reply |
| | LinkBack | Thread Tools |
| | #41 | ||||
| ipsa Scientia Potestas est Pragmatist North Carolina ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
| I think the percentage wouldn't be very high if the people sufficiently educated themselves on the potential negative side effects of the druid. You can't find drugs just as easy as alcohol because you have to seek out shady people in order to get drugs most of the time because of the ridiculous prohibition.. the availability of the drug doesn't have speak to whether or not it should be legalized. What's hypocritical to me is that the same conservatives that preach about this prohibition are the same ones who often want government out of other areas of their lives.. it's only when they get to interfere with the decisions of others that they decide the government intrusion is acceptable. IE: This, gay marriage, and so forth. | ||||
| Register to Reply to This Post |
| | #42 | ||||
| laissez-faire Capitalist ![]()
| Originally Posted by motivez make this post between WoW sessions?
![]()
| ||||
| Register to Reply to This Post |
| | #43 | ||||
| ipsa Scientia Potestas est Pragmatist North Carolina ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
| |||||
| Register to Reply to This Post |
| | #44 | ||||
| helluo librorum The Lab Moderator Humanist Chicago Suburbs ![]() ![]()
| Originally Posted by motivez You hit the nail on the head.
| ||||
| Register to Reply to This Post |
| | #45 | ||||
| Pinko Commie Bastard Communist Moscow ![]()
| Originally Posted by garbagemanlb Really?
There are many dangerous things that are legal that I don't see everyone lining up to do, I'm not sure how hardcore drug use would be any different. Most people want nothing to do with it.
__________________ Perhaps the sentiments contained in the preceding post, are not yet sufficiently favorable to procure them general favor; a long habit of not thinking a thing wrong, gives it a superficial appearance of being right, and raises at first a formidable outcry in defence of custom. But the tumult soon subsides. Time makes more converts than reason. - slightly modified from Common Sense, Thomas Paine, 1776 I am Ron Paul, Congressman from Texas... I am the champion of the Constitution. | ||||
| Register to Reply to This Post |
| | #46 | ||||
| Yeah, that guy. Progressive Oregon ![]()
| Originally Posted by thomez So you are saying that if heroin was readily available at the local drugstore/whatever, the usage levels would stay the same.
| ||||
| Register to Reply to This Post |
| | #47 | ||||
| Pinko Commie Bastard Communist Moscow ![]()
| |||||
| Register to Reply to This Post |
| | #48 | ||||
| Liberty, now and forever Libertarian Party DFW ![]()
| Originally Posted by garbagemanlb so basically what you're saying is that you think so lowly of the American people that you truly believe the only thing keeping most of them from ruining themselves with drugs is by having Nanny Government tell them what they can and can't have?
If drugs were suddenly legal today and you could buy any drug at a corner store, I for one wouldn't even for a second have any desire to go to that store. Why? Because I know drugs can be destructive. I'd be willing to bet the vast majority of Americans that are not CURRENTLY drug users will remain so. The only reason you'd see a jump in usage levels, imo, is because if it were legalized then people that are already doing it in secret will be able to be open and honest about it.
__________________ “The sacred rights of mankind are not to be rummaged for among old parchments or musty records. They are written, as with a sunbeam, in the whole volume of human nature, by the hand of the divinity itself; and can never be erased.” --Alexander Hamilton-- | ||||
| Register to Reply to This Post |
| | #49 | ||||
| Dirty Liberal Democrat South Jersey ![]() ![]() ![]()
| Originally Posted by Publius I don't even know about that much. Alcohol is accepted and legal and common, yet people with alcohol problems often hide it.
the only thing that would change would be that these drug addicts would no longer be criminals. They would be able to get help and re-assimilate back into society without the baggage of being a convicted criminal. Try getting a job and being required by law to disclose that you were a convicted criminal because you were a heroin user. What happens to that guy who can't shake his past and can't get a job? He goes back to heroin. Goes back to jail. and the cycle continues ad nauseam. | ||||
| Register to Reply to This Post |
| | #50 | ||||
| Mission Accomplished NOT! Independent MN ![]()
| I am not a fan of alcohol simply because it is widely accepted and a social drink. This is the only drug you can actually die from during withdrawal. No other drug can do this to someone. It also causes many more deaths when combined with driving. It is probably our most destructive drug out there due to availability and use. Pot has none of these effects. No addiction, no death from withdrawal. It is a joke that the stuff is illegal! | ||||
| Register to Reply to This Post |
| | #51 | ||||
| Yeah, that guy. Progressive Oregon ![]()
| Originally Posted by WickedLou9 I agree, which is why I believe in rehabilitation over punishment such as jailtime or whatnot, and definately no record (as long as no real crime was committed other than using/posessing). There is definately a problem with the current drug laws.
As for increased useage if it was legalized, frankly, I think there would be a group of people who would try it if it was as easy as buying alcohol and there was no stigma attached. Do I think our streets would suddenly be flooded with addicts? No...but anything that will increase useage should not be allowed...we don't need more drug addicts just so we can feel more 'free' as a society. I'm using heroin as an example, and that might not be the best...but what about drugs like E? How many more people would try that if it was legalized? | ||||
| Register to Reply to This Post |
| | #52 | ||||
| Pinko Commie Bastard Communist Moscow ![]()
| I still do not understand why it being legal makes reasonable adults who have never used such a thing before just jump in line at the pharmacy to "give it a try". Also, if legalized, undoubtedly there would be way more information about the drugs than what you would know now, better drug education, etc. Now we pretty much say "drugs are bad mmmkay?" and people have little idea what is in the drugs or what they do to your body. A more informed and free society with the ability to buy a bottle of E from a pharmacy is much better than the current system, in my opinion. Now you go the club and some stranger can sell you some unsanitary fake deadly concoction, if legal you could buy E with a fucking warning label and dosage instructions for crying out loud, knowing what was in it, etc. | ||||
| Register to Reply to This Post |
| | #53 | ||||
| Baka Idealist Adelaide, Australia ![]()
| Originally Posted by garbagemanlb There is no reeal evidence to back this up. Would you try it if it were legal? I also doubt the reduction of stigma.
Originally Posted by garbagemanlb We also don't need laws that fail to work. Drug useage is not reduced by tough drug laws. Nations that have stonger drug law do not have lower per-capita usage.
Originally Posted by garbagemanlb That drug was used in therapy until someone died from a mixed version of it they were taking in recreation.
The problem with drugs is abuse and misuse, not recreation. The idea of banning drugs because ther are some addicts is akin to banning unhealth foods because some people eat too much | ||||
| Register to Reply to This Post |
| | #54 | ||||
| Mission Accomplished NOT! Independent MN ![]()
| This reminds me of a place I visited where all drugs were legal. I went into the park and I was actually a little fearful for my safety and even walking by the park was sketchy. My brother lived in Zurich for a summer and I visited him on several occassions. His place was several blocks from this park and crime was at an all time high directly around this area. The idea was good but it was a total disaster. For those of you wondering what I am talkin about here is a definition found on the web.
| ||||
| Register to Reply to This Post |
| | #55 | ||||
| Baka Idealist Adelaide, Australia ![]()
| Originally Posted by Roonie Bad implementation - the drug was still illegal, and the treatment isolated
| ||||
| Register to Reply to This Post |
| Register to Post a Reply |
| Bookmarks |
| Tags |
| swat, police brutality, paramilitary, no knock warrant, drug raids, botched police action |
| ||||||
| Thread Tools | |
| |
| vBulletin 3.7.4 -- Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd. | Custom Artwork and Theme (TM) 2006, Liberty Lounge |