Originally Posted by Thorgrim still, Arden, all those volunteers should have convinced SOME libertarians-leaning indepedents or GOPers to atleast PLAN on voting for RP? What does he get, 1% still That's unacceptable if he has "real volunteers" He's up to 3% nationally. And he's up to 9% among independents. And ...
| |||||||
|
| Register to Post a Reply |
| | LinkBack | Thread Tools |
| | #21 | ||||
| Governments should fear their people Paleolibertarian ![]()
| Originally Posted by Thorgrim
He's up to 3% nationally. And he's up to 9% among independents. And he's won several straw polls. He's slowly, but surely, growing. | ||||
| Register to Reply to This Post |
| | #22 | ||||
| Banned Progressive Philadelphia, PA ![]()
| Originally Posted by lew That's within the MOE, he could be at 0%
poll-wiseYou can't deny New Hampshire has a Libertarian presence, it's the strongest of any state I've seen, there's a video somewhere on youtube of Bob Dole in the 1980s being absolutely hammered by GOP-small-government-leaning debate hosts to sign the "new hampshire pledge" that he'd never raise taxes in his term, and Dole wouldn't sign it There is NO reason he should be at 1% in such a libertarian-leaning state | ||||
| Register to Reply to This Post |
| | #23 | ||||
| Banned Conservative Government is another way to say Better Than You ![]()
| |||||
| Register to Reply to This Post |
| | #24 | ||||
| laissez-faire Capitalist ![]()
| |||||
| Register to Reply to This Post |
| | #25 | ||||
| Governments should fear their people Paleolibertarian ![]()
| |||||
| Register to Reply to This Post |
| | #26 | ||||
| Banned Progressive Philadelphia, PA ![]()
| Originally Posted by lew Yeah yeah and so could Tancredo or some other candidate no one would ever elect
Where are the NH numbers? He's pulling 1% in NH, that has to change dramaticallly...like...yesterday...or else he's finished | ||||
| Register to Reply to This Post |
| | #27 | ||||
| Governments should fear their people Paleolibertarian ![]()
| Originally Posted by Thorgrim
You didn't understand my point. You stated he could statistically be zero. That is true. It's also just as likely that he could statistically be higher than Romney. | ||||
| Register to Reply to This Post |
| Register to Post a Reply |
| Bookmarks |
| Tags |
| ronny |
| ||||||
| Thread Tools | |
| |
| vBulletin 3.7.2 -- Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd. | Custom Artwork and Theme (TM) 2006, Liberty Lounge |