Edwards is having an affair? - Page 2

WickedLou9 · 10-11-2007, 11:03 AM

Originally Posted by 7960

No. I'm constantly bombarded with "wtc7 was an inside job do you know how big the govt is they had to have planted explosives special ops can do anything they probably used their MIB pens to hypnotize people to ignore plasma cutters while people planted bombs...................prove it's not true."

So I'm keeping an open mind and waiting for Edwards to prove he didn't have an affair

Those people are stupid. Don't be like them.

7960 · 10-11-2007, 11:10 AM

Originally Posted by WickedLou9

Those people are stupid. Don't be like them.

It's very infrequently that someone makes such a compelling argument in so few words.

Ok, you win.

Stylerod · 10-11-2007, 12:28 PM

Originally Posted by 7960

It's very infrequently that someone makes such a compelling argument in so few words.

Ok, you win.

RMNIXON · 10-11-2007, 06:39 PM

This could be great for Edwards!

He can go on Oprah and be forgiven by his wife. It can be one big "feel good" event. Why not do a "Clinton" to get the jump on your competition?

I know Motivez:

JaJae · 10-11-2007, 06:44 PM

Originally Posted by RMNIXON

This could be great for Edwards!

He can go on Oprah and be forgiven by his wife. It can be one big "feel good" event. Why not do a "Clinton" to get the jump on your competition?

I know Motivez:

I was gonna say, since when did Democrats have a problem with liberal adulterers?

7960 · 10-11-2007, 07:58 PM

Originally Posted by JaJae

I was gonna say, since when did Democrats have a problem with liberal adulterers?

listening to talk radio today....... if they don't denounce him for cheating on his sick wife they look like assholes, but if they do denounce him for cheating then there's always "where were you when clinton cheated?!!?"

it's lose/lose, they won't bring it up and if they're forced to talk about it they're going to say it's a family matter and should be handled that way so they can avoid the question.

David Octavius · 10-11-2007, 08:29 PM

Originally Posted by 7960

listening to talk radio today....... if they don't denounce him for cheating on his sick wife they look like assholes, but if they do denounce him for cheating then there's always "where were you when clinton cheated?!!?"

it's lose/lose, they won't bring it up and if they're forced to talk about it they're going to say it's a family matter and should be handled that way so they can avoid the question.

First of all you guys are acting like it is proven he did something..umm the "source" is the National Fucking Enquirer! That proves nothing, not even the possibility that he may of cheated..are you conservatives so desperate to make liberals look bad that you stoop to this level??

I guess you have too since so called conservatives have become so corrupt and inept that it's embarrassing for you guys to talk about them regarding issues so the only way to support your guys is to bash the other side.

Scrum · 10-11-2007, 08:29 PM

Originally Posted by 7960

listening to talk radio today....... if they don't denounce him for cheating on his sick wife they look like assholes, but if they do denounce him for cheating then there's always "where were you when clinton cheated?!!?"

it's lose/lose, they won't bring it up and if they're forced to talk about it they're going to say it's a family matter and should be handled that way so they can avoid the question.

Or it's a bullshit story by a tabloid.

JaJae · 10-11-2007, 09:03 PM

Originally Posted by David Octavius

First of all you guys are acting like it is proven he did something..umm the "source" is the National Fucking Enquirer!

I don't believe the story, but I do believe they have something to cover their ass before making a move against a presidential candidate and someone who made their millions on frivolous lawsuits. I'm willing to bet someone "planted" the story with them knowing they'd run with the trash. The NE knew it was BS, but ran with it anyway. That's my take on it anyway.

7960 · 10-11-2007, 11:05 PM

Originally Posted by David Octavius

....are you conservatives .......

Who conservatives? You can't be talking about me because I as an individual am talking about Edwards the man, not me as a conservative (which I'm not) talking about liberals as a group.

northhunter · 10-12-2007, 06:49 AM

Just wondering if this is the same National Enquirer that everyone looks at while in the check out line while mumbling to themselves..............who reads this garbage? But hey, maybe Elvis really did have Michael Jackson's love child ya never know!

motivez · 10-12-2007, 07:41 AM

I can't believe anyone would actually take this seriously. What a joke.

Maybe we can get some WND articles by Chuck Norris next

7960 · 10-12-2007, 07:44 AM

So will the negative rep points get removed if (when?) it shows up in another news source not attributed to NE?

motivez · 10-12-2007, 07:47 AM

We don't monitor the reputation system except for obvious abuses as outlined in the rules, so that's unlikely

WickedLou9 · 10-12-2007, 09:31 AM

Originally Posted by northhunter

Just wondering if this is the same National Enquirer that everyone looks at while in the check out line while mumbling to themselves..............who reads this garbage? But hey, maybe Elvis really did have Michael Jackson's love child ya never know!

One and the same.

Stylerod · 10-12-2007, 09:37 AM

Originally Posted by northhunter

Just wondering if this is the same National Enquirer that everyone looks at while in the check out line while mumbling to themselves..............who reads this garbage? But hey, maybe Elvis really did have Michael Jackson's love child ya never know!

They have actually had some legit scoops. They were the ones that found out about Jesse Jacksons affair and illegitimate child. I think they were the first ones with real details about Clinton and Lewinsky.

That being said..... I would take this story with a HUGE grain of salt until someone else confirms it. They have told too many lies in their past to just accept anything they print outright.

7960 · 10-12-2007, 10:34 AM

Originally Posted by motivez

We don't monitor the reputation system except for obvious abuses as outlined in the rules, so that's unlikely

It was rhetorical

WickedLou9 · 10-12-2007, 11:33 AM

Originally Posted by Stylerod

They have actually had some legit scoops. They were the ones that found out about Jesse Jacksons affair and illegitimate child. I think they were the first ones with real details about Clinton and Lewinsky.

That being said..... I would take this story with a HUGE grain of salt until someone else confirms it. They have told too many lies in their past to just accept anything they print outright.

They are bound to be right once in a while. They publish anything that they are told without verifying the story. They pay people to come up with good scoops. Even if they aren't true.

Stylerod · 10-12-2007, 11:36 AM

Originally Posted by WickedLou9

They are bound to be right once in a while. They publish anything that they are told without verifying the story. They pay people to come up with good scoops. Even if they aren't true.

I think the 2nd section of my post kind of addressed that.

RMNIXON · 10-12-2007, 05:12 PM

Originally Posted by motivez

I can't believe anyone would actually take this seriously. What a joke.

Maybe we can get some WND articles by Chuck Norris next

Oprah or get Barbara Walters to do a special?