Edwards is having an affair? - Page 6

JaJae · 08-04-2008, 06:50 AM

DailyKos is banning people who make diaries about the presumed Edwards affair.
I’ve Been Banned At DailyKos Because Of John Edwards*|*STRANAHAN dot com

Stylerod · 08-04-2008, 08:44 AM

Originally Posted by JaJae

DailyKos is banning people who make diaries about the presumed Edwards affair.
I’ve Been Banned At DailyKos Because Of John Edwards*|*STRANAHAN dot com

Some of the comments are pretty interesting. But we all knew Kos was just there to support the Democratic party. Trashing a democratic leader like Edwards (why he is so highly regarded by the left baffles me completely) is against their goals.

Scrum · 08-04-2008, 08:50 AM

Still nothing other than the enquirer making claims. I don't blame them for banning people for posting that trash. Too bad we don't meet those standards.

C4Casey · 08-04-2008, 09:06 AM

No one should be banned from expressing opinions of any kind, no matter how outlandish they are. If a majority of people think that the topic of a thread is really stupid or outlandish, then they just shouldn't post on it and the thread will eventually die.

7960 · 08-04-2008, 11:11 AM

Originally Posted by Scrum

Still nothing other than the enquirer making claims. I don't blame them for banning people for posting that trash. Too bad we don't meet those standards.

trash?

witnesses have her and him there and it's corroborated by hotel security. it's looking more and more like there's something to the claims.

WickedLou9 · 08-04-2008, 11:25 AM

Originally Posted by 7960

trash?

witnesses have her and him there and it's corroborated by hotel security. it's looking more and more like there's something to the claims.

According to the national enquirer. The publishers of Bat Boy, and the evil devil in the smoke of the world trade center. They have zero credibility. Absolutely zero.

David Octavius · 08-04-2008, 01:12 PM

Whether or not Edwards had an affair is not even the point - I don't care either way - its trying to pass the enquirer as if it has credibility just because you (and whoever else who talk's and publishes this nonsense) have a personal grudge against him, very petty.

Stylerod · 08-04-2008, 04:22 PM

Originally Posted by WickedLou9

According to the national enquirer. The publishers of Bat Boy, and the evil devil in the smoke of the world trade center. They have zero credibility. Absolutely zero.

Those stories are actually from Weekly World News, not the Enquirer.

The Enquirer has broken some pretty big stories.

In 2001, the Enquirer uncovered that the Rev. Jesse Jackson had an illegitimate child. Salacious details of the Bill Clinton-Monica Lewinsky affair were first made public by the Enquirer. The Enquirer was regarded by some as having the best media coverage of the O.J. Simpson murder trial. For example, when a distinctive footprint from a Bruno Magli shoe was found at the crime scene, Simpson vehemently denied owning such a shoe. The Enquirer, however, dug up a photograph of him with just such a pair.

WickedLou9 · 08-04-2008, 04:25 PM

Originally Posted by Stylerod

Those stories are actually from Weekly World News, not the Enquirer.

The Enquirer has broken some pretty big stories.

Even a broken clock is right twice a day.

motivez · 08-04-2008, 07:18 PM

Originally Posted by C4Casey

No one should be banned from expressing opinions of any kind, no matter how outlandish they are. If a majority of people think that the topic of a thread is really stupid or outlandish, then they just shouldn't post on it and the thread will eventually die.

Agreed. We'd never ban anyone for making a stupid thread, but we might ridicule their source (hello, world net daily!)

Until some major media outlet starts doing some real investigative work, I don't think these people have any real credibility. I mean, I'm still waiting to see Bat Boy on 60 minutes talking about his experiences.

SoFlaJDM · 08-05-2008, 06:34 PM

Originally Posted by motivez

Agreed. We'd never ban anyone for making a stupid thread, but we might ridicule their source (hello, world net daily!)

hello, fox news?

7960 · 08-06-2008, 11:29 AM

Originally Posted by WickedLou9

According to the national enquirer. The publishers of Bat Boy, and the evil devil in the smoke of the world trade center. They have zero credibility. Absolutely zero.

uh-oh, looks like there are pictures

are you going to say they're chopped or will pictures begin to convince you?

let me ask that a different way...short of him coming out and saying it, what's going to convince you?

SoFlaJDM · 08-06-2008, 11:32 AM

did they get the money shot?

no, but really... a picture of him standing there with some lady won't really convince me of anything

WickedLou9 · 08-06-2008, 11:36 AM

Originally Posted by 7960

uh-oh, looks like there are pictures

are you going to say they're chopped or will pictures begin to convince you?

let me ask that a different way...short of him coming out and saying it, what's going to convince you?

A picture of what? Two naked people having sex? Oh you mean two adults standing next to each other under a caption " Edwards having affair!" as per the usual enquirer nonsese...

You are going to have to to better than grocery store tabliod garbage. There was a picture of bat boy on thier cover too. Come on, you are smarter than this. I think you just want to believe it so badly that you will accept any source no matter how unreliable it is.

Donkey® · 08-06-2008, 12:00 PM

Originally Posted by 7960

uh-oh, looks like there are pictures

are you going to say they're chopped or will pictures begin to convince you?

let me ask that a different way...short of him coming out and saying it, what's going to convince you?

This gets more and more pathetic as the months go by. I bet all those 9/11 alien abduction conspiracy nuts are hoping you take their "proof" a little more seriously now that you're one of them.