Iowa this week, what are your predictions? - Page 3
I thought you were saying that it doesn't matter that Hilary was making incorrect statements about Pakistan...
I thought you were saying that it doesn't matter that Hilary was making incorrect statements about Pakistan...
01-02-2008, 08:22 PM
| #41 | ||||
| For those about to rock...  libertarian Atlanta, GA 
| I thought you were saying that it doesn't matter that Hilary was making incorrect statements about Pakistan | ||||
     |
|
01-03-2008, 04:19 AM
| #42 | ||||
| Banned  Progressive Philadelphia, PA
| Originally Posted by Ardentfrost Musharraf is involved in several election issues, what she said isn't as innaccurate as you're making it out to be...on a long campaign trail...and talking to simple people...it was a minor mistake in translating things to Iowa voters
...since he's technically elected by parliament...which is having the elections...and also as stated various political allies are running... | ||||
| |
|
01-03-2008, 08:46 AM
| #43 | ||||
| Banned  Conservative Government is another way to say Better Than You
| Originally Posted by Ardentfrost NO of course it matters! She's got claims that she was on 'dangerous travels around the world' as First Lady. She's running for an office that requires her to know about what's goin on in the world RIGHT NOW. She damn well better know what she's talking about if she's going to bring up Pakistan in a campaign!
| ||||
| |
|
01-03-2008, 10:28 AM
| #44 | ||||
| Yeah, that guy.  Progressive Oregon
| Obama + Romney | ||||
| |
|
01-03-2008, 10:47 AM
| #45 | ||||
| Noob Independent
| I WOULD TAKE ANYONE BUT HUCKABEE (THE LIAR), McCAIN, GIULIANI. ROMNEY IS SO-SO, BUT RON PAUL SHOULD WIN! But my predictions: Romney Thompson Huckabee | ||||
| |
|
01-03-2008, 01:12 PM
| #46 | ||||
| Banned Conservative Government is another way to say Better Than You
| Originally Posted by firecracker
 I'm getting closer and closer to ANYBODY BUT HILLARY Interesting that you place Thompson so high. What makes you put him second? | ||||
| |
|
01-03-2008, 03:12 PM
| #47 | ||||
| Noob Independent
| I have to believe that Americans are waking up... we might all be surprised!!! I hope so anyway!! | ||||
| |
|
01-03-2008, 03:59 PM
| #48 | ||||
| Governments should fear their people  Paleolibertarian
| If Paul places anything less than 3rd, it won't be a failure but it will be a major disappointment. | ||||
| |
|
01-03-2008, 04:12 PM
| #49 | ||||
| Banned Progressive Philadelphia, PA
| Originally Posted by lew Can you tell me what percentage would be a failure?
| ||||
| |
|
01-03-2008, 04:24 PM
| #50 | ||||
| For those about to rock... libertarian Atlanta, GA
| Originally Posted by Thorgrim Failure will be after all the chips are in. Placing top 3 at that point will be success enough to certainly warrant a third party run, but failure would be getting low enough numbers to make a third party run futile.
At least that's how I see it | ||||
| |
|
01-03-2008, 05:53 PM
| #51 | ||||
| Political Genius  Republican Yorba Linda Ca.
| Originally Posted by ballz2wallz
I thought he was tied for third with McCain in Iowa? 
__________________ Sock It To Me!  "Bureaucracy is a Parasite that Preys on Free Thought and Suffocates Free Spirit!" - Douglas Adams | ||||
| |
|
01-03-2008, 05:58 PM
| #52 | ||||
| Junkie libertarian
| Originally Posted by RMNIXON There is a statistical three way tie with Paul/Thompson/McCain in Iowa for third place.
| ||||
| |
|
01-03-2008, 06:01 PM
| #53 | ||||
| Political Genius Republican Yorba Linda Ca.
| Originally Posted by lew
In 1992 Bill Clinton came in 4th with 3%! | ||||
| |
|
01-03-2008, 06:34 PM
| #54 | ||||
| Banned Conservative Government is another way to say Better Than You
| Originally Posted by RMNIXON He is, but getting second is the highest I've seen anybody put him yet. I still believe he's most likely to be the 'surprise candidate' but even I haven't placed him at second in Iowa.
Originally Posted by RMNIXON I know!
 That's why I can't figure out what all the fuss is about over Iowa. | ||||
| |
|
01-03-2008, 06:38 PM
| #55 | ||||
| Junkie libertarian
| Originally Posted by ballz2wallz So this is how they will dismiss Paul if he places in the top three? Clinton only pulled 3%?
Or that he is a "spoiler" as McCain's manager called him.  Excuses are great. | ||||
| |
|
01-03-2008, 06:42 PM
| #56 | ||||
| Junkie libertarian
| I can see the results on Fox now: Huckabee pulls 1st, Romney Second, Thompson Fourth, McCain Fifth, Giuliani Sixth | ||||
| |
|
01-03-2008, 07:07 PM
| #57 | ||||
| Banned Conservative Government is another way to say Better Than You
| Originally Posted by hsmith I have nothing against Paul
| ||||
| |
|
01-03-2008, 08:26 PM
| #58 | ||||
| ipsa Scientia Potestas est  Pragmatist Greensboro, NC
| They're saying turnout is huge.. that bodes well for Paul and Obama I think | ||||
| |
|
01-03-2008, 08:33 PM
| #59 | ||||
| George W Bush, God's Tool  Independent ny
| Originally Posted by hsmith Very few people here are against RP, your tired whining about "excuses" is meaningless, all we are doing is looking at the reality of the situation and think some of expectations for RP from his supporters (on this board) are too high.
I want him to do well, but I'm going to be blind about his odds
__________________
| ||||
| |
|
01-03-2008, 08:35 PM
| #60 | ||||
| George W Bush, God's Tool Independent ny
| Originally Posted by motivez It is - might bode well for McCain also, but a very good sign for RP. If he does really well here (poll 2nd or better) and in NH (win) then wow he will become a force
| ||||
| |
