Knowing that you are effectively taking a vote from the only front runner (McCain) who isn't a known religious extremist (Huckabee) who will appease the theocratic right the first chance he gets. I could see if Romney had 300 or more delegates, but he doesn't. He has no chance to ...
| | #1 | ||||
| Hamiltonian > Jeffersonian Libertarian Party DFW ![]()
| Why would you still vote for Mitt Romney Knowing that you are effectively taking a vote from the only front runner (McCain) who isn't a known religious extremist (Huckabee) who will appease the theocratic right the first chance he gets. I could see if Romney had 300 or more delegates, but he doesn't. He has no chance to win now, and your vote is wasted. His current status is the same as Ross Perots, voting for him will just take away votes for someone who might actually be able to win the national election. Like it does every year it has come down to the lesser of two evils. Its time to vote for the lesser of those two and not who we want to win. Otherwise the greater of those evils will win the nomination. ( )
__________________ “The sacred rights of mankind are not to be rummaged for among old parchments or musty records. They are written, as with a sunbeam, in the whole volume of human nature, by the hand of the divinity itself; and can never be erased.” --Alexander Hamilton-- | ||||
| Register to Reply to This Post |
| | #2 | ||||
| Braccae tuae aperiuntur. Reform Party NJ ![]() ![]()
| If you're voting for Ron Paul it's doing the same thing.. Last edited by JaJae; 02-06-2008 at 10:18 AM. | ||||
| Register to Reply to This Post |
| | #3 | ||||
| Governments should fear their people Paleolibertarian ![]()
| | ||||
| Register to Reply to This Post |
| | #4 | ||||
| Bokonist Independent Kansas City ![]()
| | ||||
| Register to Reply to This Post |
| | #5 | ||||
| General Asshole Moderate ![]()
| Originally Posted by Publius I guess that was supposed to be funny, but its more stupid. Unless Romney is mathematically out (is he? I dont know) like Ron Paul as been for the last 3 weeks you're still voting for a viable candidate. Hopefully Huckabee uses what little brains his has left and drops out of the race and supports Romney before he continues to split the Conservative vote even more.
| ||||
| Register to Reply to This Post |
| | #6 | ||||
| Give me liberty or give me death! libertarian Lake Stevens, WA ![]()
| Originally Posted by Grouch Ron Paul was not mathematically out until yesterday.
Also, voting for Romney is stupid. He can't win. Enjoy your own medicine | ||||
| Register to Reply to This Post |
| | #7 | ||||
| General Asshole Moderate ![]()
| Originally Posted by thewise1 Ron Paul was never mathematically in! You're delusional to think he ever had a chance.
I loved what he had to say but he was an over reaching platform candidate at best.Romney can't win with Huckabee around that is correct. Good thing I already voted then when it still mattered. | ||||
| Register to Reply to This Post |
| | #8 | ||||
| Noob Independent ![]()
| |||||
| Register to Reply to This Post |
| | #9 | ||||
| ipsa Scientia Potestas est Pragmatist Greensboro, NC ![]() ![]() ![]()
| True if Romney is mathematically out, although.. I don't think he is yet. Why? Well, one could argue since he does have as many delegates as he does, if he and Huckabee continue to do well and McCain can't clinch the nomination and it goes to a brokered convention, he may have a shot to come out of there as the nominee despite not being on top of the delegate count. This differs from a case involving someone like Paul, (or Nader in a general matchup) because, at least in Paul's case, he has no shot at the nomination now, and ultimately never really has. His ideas (and economic conservatism) in general has been extremely marginalized within the party, and he doesn't have enough popular support among the party establishment (or in national polls) to realistically believe he could walk out of a brokered convention as the nominee. | ||||
| Register to Reply to This Post |
| | #10 | ||||
| Friend to all. Socialist Maryland ![]()
| I would vote for Paul over Romney any day though. Romney is the anti-christ. | ||||
| Register to Reply to This Post |
| | #11 | ||||
| Political Genius Republican Yorba Linda Ca. ![]()
| Originally Posted by Donkey®
I am sure he is really worried about your vote!
__________________ Sock It To Me! ![]() "Bureaucracy is a Parasite that Preys on Free Thought and Suffocates Free Spirit!" - Douglas Adams | ||||
| Register to Reply to This Post |
| | #12 | ||||
| Political Genius Republican Yorba Linda Ca. ![]()
| |||||
| Register to Reply to This Post |
| | #13 | ||||
| 100% L.A. Livin' Independent Los Angeles, CA ![]()
| Right now, the 3 trailing candidates can still be effective. Now they have to try to prevent John McCain getting the delegates to win the nomination then will have a Brokered Convention. That's what the Ron Paul faithful are believing in now. If it happened, that'd be interesting but most likely we would end up with Romney.
__________________ "We must all hang together, or assuredly we shall all hang separately." -- Benjamin Franklin at the signing of the Declaration of Independence. | ||||
| Register to Reply to This Post |
| | #14 | ||||
| Deuteronomy 32:41 Paleolibertarian USA ![]()
| Originally Posted by Publius fixed.
But seriously, vote for who you want in office, not who the power elite project to be the likely winner. That kind of thinking is what has us in the position we're in now.
__________________ -Avengeance | ||||
| Register to Reply to This Post |
| Register to Post a Reply |
| Bookmarks |
| Tags |
| romney, failure |
| ||||||
| Thread Tools | |
| |
| vBulletin 3.7.2 -- Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd. | Custom Artwork and Theme (TM) 2006, Liberty Lounge |