Obama almost got sacked and just threw the ball up for grabs...and by some miracle his reciever caught it... created a major shift in momentum for the game. If hillary is to win she is going to have to play the rest of the game out perfect. If she has ...
| | #21 | ||||
| Master Debator Election Moderator Democrat Omaha, NE ![]() ![]() ![]()
| Obama almost got sacked and just threw the ball up for grabs...and by some miracle his reciever caught it... created a major shift in momentum for the game. If hillary is to win she is going to have to play the rest of the game out perfect. If she has a DB slip just a tiny bit and let Plaxico get open in the endzone, she is going to lose this game. | ||||
| Register to Reply to This Post |
| | #22 | ||||
| Master Debator Election Moderator Democrat Omaha, NE ![]() ![]() ![]()
| Originally Posted by Thorgrim People come back from being down. He was down by large, large percentages. Super Tuesday did not reflect that, so he made a come back.
He gained ground on her in every single state, the ones that he was supposed to win were won by larger margins, the few swing ones like missouri and CT, he was not necessarily favored to win and did... and the states he was supposed to lose, he did not lose by as large of margin as anticipated. he is on the rise, making a come back, doing whatever it is you want to call it. | ||||
| Register to Reply to This Post |
| | #23 | ||||
| Braccae tuae aperiuntur. Reform Party NJ ![]() ![]()
| Originally Posted by Thorgrim Please read the thread.
She won the states, but she lost a large chunk of her lead in most of those states. Two months ago Hillary was a blow-out on the national scale. Now she'll be lucky if she's tied. And Obama's momentum continues to grow while she continues to drop her own money into her campaign in an attempt to bring it some new life. This has probably been posted for you half a dozen times now.
__________________ No good decision was ever made in a swivel chair. Senate Majority Leader, Harry Reid: As we look back in history, the Founding Fathers would be cringing to hear people talking about eliminating earmarks. | ||||
| Register to Reply to This Post |
| | #24 | ||||
| Banned Progressive Philadelphia, PA ![]()
| I know, every post for the past month has been about how Hillary lost her big leads, it's well beyond old Obama was supposed to win California, New Mexico, and he was supposed to make it super close in Arizona, Massachusetts and even NY and NJ She outperformed, the momentum going into Super Tuesday is why Hillary was not declared the loser by the media, who would LOVE to do so, unfortunately Obama's momentum meant he was supposed to do X and he did X-Y...which is not enough to be declared the winner of super tuesday by ANY media outlet | ||||
| Register to Reply to This Post |
| | #25 | ||||
| Yeah, that guy. Progressive Oregon ![]()
| I just heard Hillary loaned her own campaign five million dollars so she could stay competitive with Obama. ![]() Hopefully she doesn't go the way of that other candidate who used his own wealth to fund a campaign... | ||||
| Register to Reply to This Post |
| | #26 | ||||
| Braccae tuae aperiuntur. Reform Party NJ ![]() ![]()
| Originally Posted by garbagemanlb Yea she can't even afford to pay her staff..
The Page - by Mark Halperin - TIME | ||||
| Register to Reply to This Post |
| | #27 | ||||
| Yeah, that guy. Progressive Oregon ![]()
| |||||
| Register to Reply to This Post |
| | #28 | ||||
| Perpetual Noob Independent ![]()
| |||||
| Register to Reply to This Post |
| | #29 | ||||
| Braccae tuae aperiuntur. Reform Party NJ ![]() ![]()
| OBAMA'S OUTLOOK: HE'S STILL ON A ROLL
| ||||
| Register to Reply to This Post |
| | #30 | ||||
| Yeah, that guy. Progressive Oregon ![]()
| |||||
| Register to Reply to This Post |
| | #31 | ||||
| Banned Progressive Philadelphia, PA ![]()
| |||||
| Register to Reply to This Post |
| | #32 | ||||
| Yeah, that guy. Progressive Oregon ![]()
| Originally Posted by Thorgrim ....I'd love a fucking list comparing the 'establishment' politicians and who they are supporting. The Clinton name is like Reagan in the GOP circles.
| ||||
| Register to Reply to This Post |
| | #33 | ||||
| Banned Progressive Philadelphia, PA ![]()
| Originally Posted by garbagemanlb
Female Senators naturally supported her, as did NY's other senator, but basically it revolves around the centrist model like Sen. Evan Bayh...trying to make the Democratic party more moderate...but the old establishment like Kennedy doesn't want that kind of change | ||||
| Register to Reply to This Post |
| | #34 | ||||
| Perpetual Noob Independent ![]()
| Originally Posted by Thorgrim and that list must have Hillary scared shitless.
my how things have changed... [Oprah Winfrey as democratic establishment though? That's a bit of a stretch ] | ||||
| Register to Reply to This Post |
| | #35 | ||||
| Noob Humanist ![]()
| I don't think Hillary can win this. She was racing time, and she lost. If you're a liberal, and you see Obama speak, there is a 50% chance you switch sides from Clinton. If you like Obama, and you see Hillary speak, you laugh in her face. Obama is going to wrap this up nicely and he wields his economic leverage. | ||||
| Register to Reply to This Post |
| | #36 | ||||
| Braccae tuae aperiuntur. Reform Party NJ ![]() ![]()
| Originally Posted by Phantom The list is only about 100 people long and includes celebrities, former politicians, state politicians, mayors, etc. If someone took the time to comprise a list for Hillary I'm willing to bet it would be multiples in length.
Hillary is the establishment candidate by far and large. | ||||
| Register to Reply to This Post |
| | #37 | ||||
| Master Debator Election Moderator Democrat Omaha, NE ![]() ![]() ![]()
| Originally Posted by Thorgrim With all that old school liberal support, you would think you would be on board with Mr. Obama instead of Hillary. They have all signed on for the collective good comrade, join the party. I don't see you supporting a "moderate" anyway.
Further it is completely fucking retarded to base the accusation of him being an "establishment" candidate because of those who are endorsing him. | ||||
| Register to Reply to This Post |
| | #38 | ||||
| helluo librorum The Lab Moderator Humanist Chicago Suburbs ![]() ![]()
| Andrew Sullivan is an "establishment" Democrat? | ||||
| Register to Reply to This Post |
| | #39 | ||||
| Banned Progressive Philadelphia, PA ![]()
| Originally Posted by DosEquis I liked Howard Dean in 2004, he was more liberal, that doesn't mean I'd vote for him...
It's not just about ideology and policy positions, it's also about who can be elected, and what would they actually do in office I really see a Obama as a big gamble for the general election, like Howard Dean, and we don't need that Also, even if he got elected, i really see him twiddling his thumbs as we're still suffering from the recession, and his "bipartisan" vague ideas never get turned into an actual bill, or the ones that do get blocked in the Senate After 4 years he's seen as a do-nothing president who is tossed out | ||||
| Register to Reply to This Post |
| | #40 |
| Banned |