Originally Posted by A_C_E Actually, if you play with the same people all the time, you will end up getting screwed in the long run if you aren't the best player. Home games are only effective if you are all very similar in skill, since you eventually pick up on ...
| |||||||
|
| View Poll Results: Will Hillary Clinton Win the Nomination | |||
| Hell No - Not even she can rebound from 10 straight loses | | 16 | 84.21% |
| Hell Yea - She will make a Comeback and Shock the Critics | | 3 | 15.79% |
| Voters: 19. You may not vote on this poll | |||
| Register to Post a Reply |
| | LinkBack | Thread Tools |
| | #21 | ||||
| Dirty Liberal Democrat South Jersey ![]() ![]()
| Originally Posted by A_C_E Yeah I went to AC once and really all you need are a couple players at the table that are not very good.
There was one player that I remember that was a virtual page out of Karo's book of tells. I was getting no cards though and it was the first time I played in a real casino. I think I played 5 or 6 hands over 4 hours. You just need to find a fish at the table and avoid getting into hands with the sharks. | ||||
| Register to Reply to This Post |
| | #22 | ||||
| Political Genius Republican Yorba Linda Ca. ![]()
| I voted NO! But Wolf Blitzer thinks Yes She Can! ![]() "In short, I think it’s fair to say she’s in serious political trouble right now. But given the Clintons’ history, it would be a mistake to say her quest for the presidency is over. If she manages to win in Texas and Ohio — and that still is possible — she will go on to Pennsylvania on April 22, and this roller coaster political season will continue." CNN Political Ticker: All politics, all the time Blog Archive - Blitzer: Don’t count Hillary Clinton out « - Blogs from CNN.com
__________________ Sock It To Me! ![]() "Bureaucracy is a Parasite that Preys on Free Thought and Suffocates Free Spirit!" - Douglas Adams | ||||
| Register to Reply to This Post |
| | #23 | ||||
| Better Dead than Red Democrat Where America Goes to Talk ![]()
| wrong answer on my part | ||||
| Register to Reply to This Post |
| | #24 | ||||
| George W Bush, God's Tool Independent ny ![]() ![]()
| Obama wins Democrats Abroad contest CNN Political Ticker: All politics, all the time - Blogs from CNN.com
__________________
| ||||
| Register to Reply to This Post |
| | #25 | ||||
| The Fed Must Go! Paleolibertarian ![]()
| Originally Posted by WickedLou9 Wouldn't this depend on the two overcards that Obama holds in your example?
If he held anything other than an Ace, she has 3 cards to a straight giving her more outs than just two 9's. She'd have to hit runner, runner, but it's still more outs... Love Texas holdem! Fed Up
__________________ "An unconstitutional act is not a law; it confers no rights; it imposes no duties; it affords no protection; it creates no office; it is in legal contemplation, as inoperative as though it had never been passed." Norton v. Shelby County, 118 US 425 (1885) | ||||
| Register to Reply to This Post |
| | #26 | ||||
| Leges sine Moribus Vanae Liberal University City, Philly and Buffalo ![]()
| Originally Posted by Fed Up So she's 12% on the turn instead of 8%, big difference
| ||||
| Register to Reply to This Post |
| | #27 | ||||
| The Fed Must Go! Paleolibertarian ![]()
| I'm pointing out the fallacy in the "Texas holdem" analogy...based on his flawed example... not the percentage chance of either of them winning... ...and doesn't this depend on what the turn card is? Any good "holdem" player would already knows the percentages... ...the analogy still wouldn't be in Clinton's favor.... ...but I am one of the 3 who voted for her in the poll because the "trend" is your friend...Bush, Clinton, Bush, Clinton... I like my chances... Fed Up | ||||
| Register to Reply to This Post |
| | #28 | ||||
| Dirty Liberal Democrat South Jersey ![]() ![]()
| Originally Posted by Fed Up You are looking too deep into it. If you don;t like her 9's maybe we can replace them with 5's or something. It doesn't matter. It was just an analogy.
| ||||
| Register to Reply to This Post |
| | #29 | ||||
| The Fed Must Go! Paleolibertarian ![]()
| |||||
| Register to Reply to This Post |
| | #30 | ||||
| Noob Independent ![]()
| Clinton's hope of becoming the next president is OVER! YAHOO! Now we have a choice of Obamanous or McCamnesty. | ||||
| Register to Reply to This Post |
| | #31 | ||||
| ipsa Scientia Potestas est Pragmatist Greensboro, NC ![]() ![]() ![]()
| What's Obamanous supposed to mean? | ||||
| Register to Reply to This Post |
| | #32 | ||||
| Perpetual Noob Independent ![]()
| |||||
| Register to Reply to This Post |
| Register to Post a Reply |
| Bookmarks |
| Tags |
| obama, clinton |
| ||||||
| Thread Tools | |
| |
| vBulletin 3.7.2 -- Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd. | Custom Artwork and Theme (TM) 2006, Liberty Lounge |