(Blatantly stolen from Peyomp) July 30, 1996 Web posted at: 8:40 p.m. EDT WASHINGTON (CNN) -- President Clinton urged Congress Tuesday to act swiftly in developing anti-terrorism legislation before its August recess "We need to keep this country together right now. We need to focus on this terrorism issue," Clinton ...
| | #1 | ||||
| Unite for Dems or Liberty Dies Progressive Philadelphia, PA ![]() ![]()
| A switch in terror roles (Blatantly stolen from Peyomp) July 30, 1996 Web posted at: 8:40 p.m. EDT WASHINGTON (CNN) -- President Clinton urged Congress Tuesday to act swiftly in developing anti-terrorism legislation before its August recess "We need to keep this country together right now. We need to focus on this terrorism issue," Clinton said during a White House news conference. ... Sen. Orrin Hatch, R-Utah, chairman of the Senate Judiciary Committee, emerged from the meeting and said, "These are very controversial provisions that the White House wants. Some they're not going to get." Hatch called Clinton's proposed study of taggants -- chemical markers in explosives that could help track terrorists -- "a phony issue." CNN - President wants Senate to hurry with new laws - July 30, 1996 Yet the American people trust the Republicans more than Democrats on terrorism *sigh* I think one, just one Democratic president after 9/11 and that'll evaporate... | ||||
| Register to Reply to This Post |
| | #2 | ||||
| helluo librorum The Lab Moderator Humanist Chicago Suburbs ![]() ![]()
| I saw this over on the other forum. Good stuff. | ||||
| Register to Reply to This Post |
| | #3 | ||||
| Better Dead than Red Democrat "My friends, we’ve got them just where we want them.” ![]()
| peyomp needs to come over here | ||||
| Register to Reply to This Post |
| | #4 | ||||
| Braccae tuae aperiuntur. Reform Party NJ ![]() ![]()
| There is more to the Clinton administration than one news story. And even still if you look at the Democratic proposals or lack thereof, you'll see why Americans are willing to "settle" with the Republicans. It isn't an accident that the American people don't trust Democrats with national security and terrorism. In fact, it's quite pathetic the people don't trust the Democrats more given how badly the Republicans are fucking up. You'd think this would be an easy win for the Democrats, but they're light-years behind the Republicans on the issue of national security, just as they've always been. | ||||
| Register to Reply to This Post |
| | #5 | ||||
| Master Debator Election Moderator Democrat Omaha, NE ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
| I can agree with that. Originally Posted by JaJae I think this is horse shit and sounds like a Sean Hannity GOP talking point. Democrats have had plenty of plans. Some of which are noted in the article from 1996, and other plans have been through out their minority status in government. The thing the republicans are most effective at is marginalizing their opponents ideas. They are just better at politics. They have actually sold an unconstitutional spying program to the american people, and have actually made democrats look foolish for a desire to have checks and balances such as warrants for the spying. They have actually made democrats look weak on national security issue by issue, by making it sound like they are making things complicated when all they are doing is insisting they follow the constitution.
It is really really sad, and based upon your opinion there it looks like even jajae has bought the republican rhetoric. | ||||
| Register to Reply to This Post |
| | #6 | ||||
| Braccae tuae aperiuntur. Reform Party NJ ![]() ![]()
| Originally Posted by DosEquis It's not rhetoric. If you look at which party has been for establishing a firm military and expanding national security you'll see it's the Republicans. Even with the missile defense shield, the Republicans are the ones currently promoting it... the Democrats call it a waste of money and do everything they can to show how the results are "rigged" and downplay any progress.
Forget the PATRIOT Act, Hannity, Rush, everything else and if you look at what Clinton did to our military during his administration and compare it to Reagan or other past Republicans and you'll see which party is for supporting the military and our national security. The fact that Democrats have fooled people into thinking it's all rhetoric is what's a shame. But, even still people defend the GOP and trust them more than the Dems. It's quite fitting. Democrats and Republicans have always had different standards and goals towards our military and national security. After the GOP has been fucking up the Dems are trying to show that they're just as good if not better than the GOP. But the fact is, they have no plan... as usual. They are the ones with nothing but rhetoric. | ||||
| Register to Reply to This Post |
| | #7 | ||||
| Master Debator Election Moderator Democrat Omaha, NE ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
| Originally Posted by JaJae The missle shield is a waste of money because terrorist groups are not going to launch any missles. They will use other tactics such as a 'dirty' bomb. They can't afford ICBM missles. Other countries who have such a capability will launch dozens upon dozens of missles to achieve mutual assured destruction. The missle shield has enough trouble shooting one missle down, not to mention dozens. It has cost billions upon billions to develop and test this and we will never have to use it. Progress or not it is a waste of money.
Originally Posted by JaJae What did clinton do? Close some bases? Level off funding? When bush closes bases it is called a strategic realignment. When Clinton does it, its "omg destroying" the military. You are right, democrats do not support the military. Paul Hackett, no support there. John Murtha, no support for the military there. Wesley Clark, no support there. Bob Kerry, nope.. he doesn't support the military either. He just lost his leg. There are many democrats who were soldiers, and some are well decorated. To say democrats do not support the military is completely fucking retarded and it IS republican rhetoric. I have a feeling that 'being retarded' and 'republican rhetoric' is not coincidental.
Just sit back and really examine what invading Iraq has done for our national security, military, and credibility. | ||||
| Register to Reply to This Post |
| | #8 | ||||
| Braccae tuae aperiuntur. Reform Party NJ ![]() ![]()
| First of all Clinton was a man who disliked the military. He kept pay stagnate. Recruiting problems started on his watch in 98-99, not Bush's. He closed bases, changed regulations, basically did everything he could to buttfuck the military including the "don't ask don't tell". Originally Posted by Clinton We can go on all day and list names of congressmen who served in the military. That doesn't change the fact of what the two parties stand for. Democrats stand for a smaller more PC military while Republicans are for a larger military that is as effective as possible regardless of what's PC.
Bush may have been fucking up, but the Democrats haven't exactly won the hearts and minds of the American public when it comes to a strong military. And I've never stated Democrats don't support the military. I said they have different standards than the Republicans. This up until 9/11 has been part of their party platform. They were once proud of being for a smaller military, and many still are. Only recently have they started to change their tune, yet they have no policy or plans of what to do. Obviously we can start picking out individual politicians like Joe Lieberman who don't fit the Democratic mold. However, history shows which party is more aligned on defense. The Democrats drew that line and now they're eating it. Last edited by JaJae; 09-12-2006 at 03:18 PM. | ||||
| Register to Reply to This Post |
| | #9 | ||||
| helluo librorum The Lab Moderator Humanist Chicago Suburbs ![]() ![]()
|
And I didn't realize the president could cut the military budgets and downsize them (although this was right after the cold war) without approval from the congress? Clinton must be a magician to have pulled that off. Last edited by Scrum; 09-12-2006 at 05:07 PM. | ||||
| Register to Reply to This Post |
| | #10 | ||||
| For those about to rock... libertarian Atlanta, GA ![]() ![]()
| Originally Posted by Scrumtralecent He did make his cigar disappear once
Sorry, couldn't stop myself | ||||
| Register to Reply to This Post |
| | #11 | ||||
| Braccae tuae aperiuntur. Reform Party NJ ![]() ![]()
| What does this biased list have to do with Democratic vs Republican military policies for the past few decades? | ||||
| Register to Reply to This Post |
| | #12 | ||||
| ipsa Scientia Potestas est Pragmatist North Carolina ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
| biased | ||||
| Register to Reply to This Post |
| | #13 | ||||
| helluo librorum The Lab Moderator Humanist Chicago Suburbs ![]() ![]()
| Originally Posted by JaJae
Biased list? How is a list of what people have done biased?And it has everything to do with this thread. You tried to say that the Republicans have it right compared to the Democrats. But they aren't the ones who have served. You listen to the people who have experience in the military on military matters. I noticed to didn't even adress my second point. You blame Clinton for the military downsizing. How did he accomplish this with the Republicans fighting him on it and having control of the congress? | ||||
| Register to Reply to This Post |
| | #14 | ||||
| Unite for Dems or Liberty Dies Progressive Philadelphia, PA ![]() ![]()
| Reality has a well known liberal bias! | ||||
| Register to Reply to This Post |
| | #15 | ||||
| Braccae tuae aperiuntur. Reform Party NJ ![]() ![]()
| How can you read that list and say they gave equal treatment to both parties? Give me a break guys. That list was made to promote Democratic agenda. | ||||
| Register to Reply to This Post |
| | #16 | ||||
| helluo librorum The Lab Moderator Humanist Chicago Suburbs ![]() ![]()
| Originally Posted by JaJae Point to a person and say the list is wrong.
(Name) - (Served in blah blah blah or Did not serve) Show me one of those that's wrong. | ||||
| Register to Reply to This Post |
| | #17 | ||||
| Braccae tuae aperiuntur. Reform Party NJ ![]() ![]()
| Originally Posted by Scrumtralecent It's not that it's wrong, but it's a selective list and the responses are biased.
I can't believe people in this country who have followed politics actually believe the Democrats are as gung-ho on the military as Republicans. This is just ridiculous. | ||||
| Register to Reply to This Post |
| | #18 |
| |