May 2 (Bloomberg) -- The U.S. lost fewer jobs than forecast in April, and the unemployment rate dropped, signaling that the economic slowdown may be milder than the 2001 recession. Payrolls shrank by 20,000 workers, following a revised 81,000 drop in March that was larger than previously estimated, the Labor ...
| | #1 | ||||
| Administrator libertarian Oklahoma ![]()
| Economic downturn may be milder than originally thought...
Unemployment rates actually dropped and payrolls shrank much smaller than expected. This bodes well for the economy as a whole. It will be interesting to see what happens in May because things are not yet stable in the credit markets and housing markets. Though things are much improved. | ||||
| Register to Reply to This Post |
| | #2 | ||||
| Dirty Liberal Democrat South Jersey ![]() ![]()
| I guess I had the market timing right after all. | ||||
| Register to Reply to This Post |
| | #3 | ||||
| Braccae tuae aperiuntur. Reform Party NJ ![]() ![]()
| Recession? I admit, I bought the hype. I was sure we were heading into a recession. Now.. not so sure. First stories like this started coming out.
Now we're starting to see this:
To recap... GDP grown, Stocks Up, Dollar Up, Employment Up... Where's the recession? Sure this is stagnant growth compared to what we're seeing, but we're still seeing an upward trend. How much of the downfall we're seeing could be attributed to the media sensationalism towards the economy?
__________________ No good decision was ever made in a swivel chair. Senate Majority Leader, Harry Reid: As we look back in history, the Founding Fathers would be cringing to hear people talking about eliminating earmarks. | ||||
| Register to Reply to This Post |
| | #4 | ||||
| Dirty Liberal Democrat South Jersey ![]() ![]()
| To be fair, we are in a recession, it's just not the end of the world that some people said it would be. | ||||
| Register to Reply to This Post |
| | #5 | ||||
| Leges sine Moribus Vanae Liberal University City, Philly and Buffalo ![]()
| We are definitely in a recession. As Lou pointed out yesterday, 0.6% annualized GDP growth is based on a 2.6% inflation measure, which is simply false. It's closer to 4% right now. JaJae, those indicators are not "up"--They're just less negative, which leaves us still technically in recession. But yea, it'll be milder than assumed. | ||||
| Register to Reply to This Post |
| | #6 | ||||
| Leges sine Moribus Vanae Liberal University City, Philly and Buffalo ![]()
| Don't be so sure about that yet I'm holding off on making any moves until we start seeing Q2 indicators. The insanely low level of consumer spending growth still has me pretty worried. I wouldn't do anything until July, personally. The opportunity for capital growth you miss out on between now and then is going to be minimal compared to the risk you're incurring. It's not worth it to move now. | ||||
| Register to Reply to This Post |
| | #7 | ||||
| Never, never, never give up Conservative Party High Point, NC ![]()
| |||||
| Register to Reply to This Post |
| | #8 | ||||
| Dirty Liberal Democrat South Jersey ![]() ![]()
| We have had 2 quarters of negative growth. The .6% growth is a preliminary number that is based on 2.6% inflation which is factually incorrect. By any measure, inflation is closer to 4%. If you use accurate data we are in a recession. Sure you can make up numbers and then use them to justify saying that we aren't but that's not indicitive of reality. | ||||
| Register to Reply to This Post |
| | #9 | ||||
| Dirty Liberal Democrat South Jersey ![]() ![]()
| You know what they say about 3 kinds of lies though... Wether or not we have tweak the number htis way or another, the economy isn't doing well and I think most people recognize that. I hate when people get caught up in arguing the minutia of what a recession is. Thats an academic arguement of no real consequence. | ||||
| Register to Reply to This Post |
| | #10 | ||||
| Banned by Super *********s Moderate ![]()
| It'd be quite vindicating to see commodity traders get screwed in a turn around | ||||
| Register to Reply to This Post |
| | #11 | ||||
| Leges sine Moribus Vanae Liberal University City, Philly and Buffalo ![]()
| Originally Posted by WickedLou9 I really hate when people use that theory. There are much better ways to determine a recession than pos/neg GDP growth.
| ||||
| Register to Reply to This Post |
| | #12 | ||||
| Administrator libertarian Oklahoma ![]()
| Originally Posted by A_C_E Actually that 2.6% is pretty accurate. The price fo fuel is way up and housing is way down.
The CPI is 2.6ish percent...GDP appears to have grown and at worst it was flat. | ||||
| Register to Reply to This Post |
| | #13 | ||||
| Leges sine Moribus Vanae Liberal University City, Philly and Buffalo ![]()
| Originally Posted by 6SpeedTA95 CPI is a bad measure of inflation and always has been.
Money-velocity inflation equation works out to like 3.7%....and that's a much more accurate indicator. | ||||
| Register to Reply to This Post |
| | #14 | ||||
| Administrator libertarian Oklahoma ![]()
| Originally Posted by A_C_E I agree, the CPI ignores things like food/energy/housing.
A lot of estimates of real inflation are actually LOWER than the CPI for the first quarter. Why? The huge drop in home prices. So saying its completely inaccurate may be true but assuming its only worse is false. | ||||
| Register to Reply to This Post |
| | #15 | ||||
| Leges sine Moribus Vanae Liberal University City, Philly and Buffalo ![]()
| Originally Posted by 6SpeedTA95 Actually the core CPI excludes food and energy, while the regular CPI includes it.
I'm not assuming it's worse for the first quarter; I actually did the math and it came out to be worse. | ||||
| Register to Reply to This Post |
| | #16 | ||||
| Dirty Liberal Democrat South Jersey ![]() ![]()
| This is why I think it's silly to argue about the definition. Is it wrong to use the 2.6 CPI%? Definately not. It's a valid measure of something. Is it wrong to use the other measure? no. The definition of recession does not dictate how GDP should be calculated so there is no right answer. It think we should just be satisfied to say the economy is not doing well. If you want to talk about specfic indicators, thats fine too. Are we or aren't we in a techincal recession? I don't really care. It is what it is, and what it is aint that great. | ||||
| Register to Reply to This Post |
| | #17 | ||||
| Administrator libertarian Oklahoma ![]()
| |||||
| Register to Reply to This Post |
| | #18 | ||||
| The Fed Must Go! Paleolibertarian ![]()
| Don't believe the hype... "If the CPI was calculated the same way it was when Paul Volker was the Federal Reserve Chairman, then we currently have 12% inflation, versus the 4% reported by our government. Which rate seems right to you?" Source: Shadow Government Statistics Inflation at 2.6%? 4%? 4% is correct if you utilize the CPI-U. Another misnomer someone mentioned is housing. Housing isn't included in the CPI, but "rents" are. Consumer Price Indexes for Rent and Rental Equivalence You tell me by looking at these stats where inflation is since GW took charge: EVERYDAY COSTS (per BLS.gov) ~ 2008 top price 2000 lower price % Change from 2000 to 2008 Gasoline (per gallon) $3.28 $1.36 141% Natural gas (per ccf) $1.30 $0.71 83% Electricity (per kwh) $.116 $.084 38% Milk (per gallon) $3.87 $2.78 39% Bread (per lb) $1.28 $0.91 41% Eggs (per dozen) $2.18 $0.98 122% Orange Juice (per gal.) $2.54 $1.82 40% Ground Beef (per lb.) $2.33 $1.48 57% FISCAL ISSUES ~ 2008 top number 2000 next number Percentage Change 2000 to 2008 National Debt $9.4 trillion $5.5 trillion 71% Annual Budget surplus/(deficit) ($400) billion $150 billion ($550) billion Median S&P 500 CEO pay $8 million $6 million 33% Median household income $49,000 $42,000 17% Consumer Price Index (per BLS) 211.1 168.8 25% Consumer credit $2.52 trillion $1.54 trillion 64% Median Home value $168,000 $120,000 40% Euro vs. Dollar $1.57 $0.85 –87%
__________________ "An unconstitutional act is not a law; it confers no rights; it imposes no duties; it affords no protection; it creates no office; it is in legal contemplation, as inoperative as though it had never been passed." Norton v. Shelby County, 118 US 425 (1885) | ||||
| Register to Reply to This Post |
| | #19 | |||
| Leges sine Moribus Vanae Liberal University City, Philly and Buffalo ![]()
|