Do you think G.W. Bush will get credit - Page 2

kinggovernor · 07-02-2008, 05:04 PM

Originally Posted by thewise1

What does it matter? It's obviously working, do you see any lions?

no it is not obvious, the comparison does not match up.

thewise1 · 07-02-2008, 05:06 PM

Originally Posted by kinggovernor

no it is not obvious, the comparison does not match up.

Well no lions have attacked me ever since I got it, so I know where to put the credit, even if you don't

kinggovernor · 07-02-2008, 05:51 PM

Originally Posted by thewise1

Well no lions have attacked me ever since I got it, so I know where to put the credit, even if you don't

is there a large threat of lion attacks in Seattle?

kinggovernor · 07-02-2008, 05:52 PM

Originally Posted by 7960

if there is not an attack before he leaves office he will be able to say for the rest of his life "I kept america safe from another attack for 7 years."

that is my point.

kinggovernor · 07-02-2008, 05:54 PM

Originally Posted by nbiggershaft

Just a quick google, why would anyone interpret 2000-2008 as being any safer than before? There weren't any domestic terrorist attacks after 9/11 but there were next to none before.

2001-2008 has been safer for the American's homeland than it 1992-2001

kinggovernor · 07-02-2008, 05:57 PM

Originally Posted by motivez

Considering he's helped create more terrorists and has radicalized a new generation of young muslims, the blowback from his idiotic invasion of Iraq wont be felt for years, I'm sure.

These people don't attack on a quick time scale, they're willing to wait and plot and I'm sure at some point in the future they're going to be successful, it's inevitable.

In the mean time, though, they're content to get training in an urban environment in Iraq and recruit more and more people to their cause.. if not Al Qaeda specifically, then other groups similar and sympathetic to their agenda.

you might disagree with his methods but they have worked so far

kinggovernor · 07-02-2008, 05:57 PM

Originally Posted by motivez

Yeah, and terror attacks world wide are up dramatically.

which goes to show how large the threat is and how we have done things right so far

thewise1 · 07-02-2008, 05:58 PM

Originally Posted by kinggovernor

is there a large threat of lion attacks in Seattle?

K for your information, asshole, I have seen a lion. And not one of your crap ass queen of the jungle homoerotic pussy-cat lions. A real lion, with fangs and horns and wings and shit. Don't pull your ****ing wierd ass liberal lion sympathizer hypnosis crap on me when you don't even know wtf you're talking about.

nbiggershaft · 07-02-2008, 05:59 PM

Originally Posted by kinggovernor

2001-2008 has been safer for the American's homeland than it 1992-2001

I don't think you can prove that by selectively choosing that timeframe and pointing to two incidents. I've never even had a Bush supporter try to use this argument with me. The most I've heard is that terrorist attacks are up but we are defeating them in the long term. The amount of Americans(and American civilians) dieing by Islamic terrorist attacks after the war on terror is much greater than before it.

lew · 07-02-2008, 06:07 PM

Nazi Germany hasn't attacked us while Bush has been President either.

He should receive credit for that.

Ardentfrost · 07-02-2008, 06:26 PM

Originally Posted by thewise1

K for your information, asshole, I have seen a lion. And not one of your crap ass queen of the jungle homoerotic pussy-cat lions. A real lion, with fangs and horns and wings and shit. Don't pull your ****ing wierd ass liberal lion sympathizer hypnosis crap on me when you don't even know wtf you're talking about.

omfg, post of the year!

kinggovernor · 07-02-2008, 06:34 PM

Originally Posted by thewise1

K for your information, asshole, I have seen a lion. And not one of your crap ass queen of the jungle homoerotic pussy-cat lions. A real lion, with fangs and horns and wings and shit. Don't pull your ****ing wierd ass liberal lion sympathizer hypnosis crap on me when you don't even know wtf you're talking about.

That's totally not appropriate. I didn't even make that outrageous of a claim, but you definitely disrespected me, and the entire scientific community on that one. I don't care if you just know that much about the subject, or you are just ignorant to the facts that are in the field that I am an expert on, but come on. Don't bullshit the fact that I know more about this than you do. Just come straight and say you don't know what you're talking about, and we'll be cool. Seriously? This is fucking bullshit, you shouldn't get so riled up about such trivial things, but if you do, you're a fucking faggot. Go home and make love to your fucking real doll. You don't know shit about what we're talking about and you need to fucking leave this thread right now. Buy a bullet and rent a gun, because sir, you are finished in life.

thewise1 · 07-02-2008, 06:36 PM

Originally Posted by kinggovernor

That's totally not appropriate. I didn't even make that outrageous of a claim, but you definitely disrespected me, and the entire scientific community on that one. I don't care if you just know that much about the subject, or you are just ignorant to the facts that are in the field that I am an expert on, but come on. Don't bullshit the fact that I know more about this than you do. Just come straight and say you don't know what you're talking about, and we'll be cool. Seriously? This is fucking bullshit, you shouldn't get so riled up about such trivial things, but if you do, you're a fucking faggot. Go home and make love to your fucking real doll. You don't know shit about what we're talking about and you need to fucking leave this thread right now. Buy a bullet and rent a gun, because sir, you are finished in life.

motivez · 07-02-2008, 07:09 PM

Originally Posted by kinggovernor

you might disagree with his methods but they have worked so far

No they haven't

motivez · 07-02-2008, 07:12 PM

Originally Posted by kinggovernor

which goes to show how large the threat is and how we have done things right so far

Again, wrong

Correlation does not imply causation

Just because there haven't been terrorist attacks in the US doesn't mean Bush is responsible for the lack of them.

kinggovernor · 07-02-2008, 08:17 PM

Originally Posted by motivez

No they haven't

there hasn't been an attack on American soil since 9/11, even our adversaries have declared the fight to be outside of our borders.

kinggovernor · 07-02-2008, 08:18 PM

Originally Posted by motivez

Again, wrong

Correlation does not imply causation

Just because there haven't been terrorist attacks in the US doesn't mean Bush is responsible for the lack of them.

being the commander of chief he is responsible for our national security.

thewise1 · 07-02-2008, 08:20 PM

Originally Posted by kinggovernor

being the commander of chief he is responsible for our national security.

Does this mean that Clinton was a better CIC than Bush because the WTC lived through that attack?

Scrum · 07-02-2008, 09:08 PM

Originally Posted by kinggovernor

there hasn't been an attack on American soil since 9/11, even our adversaries have declared the fight to be outside of our borders.

DC sniper, Anthrax attacks......both after 9/11.

kinggovernor · 07-02-2008, 10:21 PM

Originally Posted by thewise1

Does this mean that Clinton was a better CIC than Bush because the WTC lived through that attack?

he failed to see what a danger OBL was, so no.