Originally Posted by ballz2wallz If I knew everything the government did, I'd be a covert operative. I'm not asking you to name everything. I'm asking for ONE thing; ONE thing that proves beyond a doubt Bush has made us safer...
09-21-2006, 05:15 PM
| #41 | ||||
| Hamiltonian > Jeffersonian  Libertarian Party DFW 
| Originally Posted by ballz2wallz I'm not asking you to name everything. I'm asking for ONE thing; ONE thing that proves beyond a doubt Bush has made us safer 
| ||||
     |
|
09-21-2006, 05:16 PM
| #42 | ||||
| Dirty Liberal  Democrat South Jersey
| Originally Posted by Stylerod I posted the link to the Code of Journalistic ethics. If Fox news is unethical in thier reporting it's up to you if you want to watch them. I don't really know what you are trying to say here.
| ||||
| |
|
09-21-2006, 05:16 PM
| #43 | ||||
| Hamiltonian > Jeffersonian Libertarian Party DFW
| Originally Posted by ballz2wallz i don't want any network or cable news, I prefer getting my news from sources with better ethics.
| ||||
| |
|
09-21-2006, 05:21 PM
| #44 | ||||
| Never, never, never give up  Conservative Party High Point, NC
|
If a news outlet isn't completely left, you guys start to bitch. We have seen 3 or 4 studies done that show's fox being more right then the others but not that far right of center. Calling them a mouth piece for the administration is just wishful thinking. | ||||
| |
|
09-21-2006, 05:22 PM
| #45 | ||||
| Dirty Liberal Democrat South Jersey
| Originally Posted by Stylerod I'm not talking about all of fox news and thier programs. I am talking about this one incident.
| ||||
| |
|
09-21-2006, 05:24 PM
| #46 | ||||
| Banned  Conservative Government is another way to say Better Than You
| Originally Posted by Publius Good luck with that
| ||||
| |
|
09-21-2006, 05:25 PM
| #47 | ||||
| Hamiltonian > Jeffersonian Libertarian Party DFW
| Originally Posted by ballz2wallz The Economist is certainly more ethical AND intellectually honest, as is pretty much ALL print news when compared with TV news (though certainly there are many print news sources, like the NYT, with quite questionable ethics).
| ||||
| |
|
09-21-2006, 05:26 PM
| #48 | ||||
| Never, never, never give up Conservative Party High Point, NC
| Originally Posted by WickedLou9 That there are sites out there that look at Fox News, every minute of the day, and anytime "they think" they said something that might have a bias (towards Bush) they hurry and write a story and give you phone numbers and emails to contact the offending party. You don't like it, change the channel!
| ||||
| |
|
09-21-2006, 05:26 PM
| #49 | ||||
| helluo librorum The Lab Moderator  Humanist Chicago Suburbs
| Originally Posted by Stylerod 3 or 4? I have seen 1. Please post the others.
This has nothing to do with other news outlets. This has to do with FNC. If you want to talk about the other outlets make your own thread. | ||||
| |
|
09-21-2006, 05:29 PM
| #50 | ||||
| Banned Conservative Government is another way to say Better Than You
| Originally Posted by Publius Administration outlines foiled plots (AP)
| ||||
| |
|
09-21-2006, 10:23 PM
| #51 | ||||
| The Bydo Empire must die! Independent
| I don't think anyone contests that the administration has halted attacks. I'm sure this would have occured no matter who was in power. The concern is of the effectiveness of the METHODS used, and whether they have nullified themselves. For example, could we have halted all those attacks listed without PATRIOT? Would leaving saddam in power have caused there to be greater or lesser interest in attacking/hating US soil/interests? | ||||
| |
|
09-21-2006, 10:36 PM
| #52 | ||||
| Banned Conservative Government is another way to say Better Than You
| Originally Posted by R-Type And how are we to know that?
| ||||
| |
|
09-21-2006, 10:48 PM
| #53 | ||||
| Never, never, never give up Conservative Party High Point, NC
| Originally Posted by ballz2wallz We can't. It's all speculation. What's done is done.
| ||||
| |
|
09-21-2006, 11:29 PM
| #54 | ||||
| The Bydo Empire must die! Independent
| Originally Posted by ballz2wallz We don't either way, and that's what worries me. If the administration is so sure their ways are working, they could do more than list a few foiled plots without any correlative analysis. Again, the concern is the methods and whether their results are/were worth the sacrifices. Have we increased or decreased terrorist plots and/or interest in terrorism against the US? If they can't answer that with any kind of objectivity, then I'd say their methods are failures.
| ||||
| |
|
09-22-2006, 12:01 AM
| #55 | ||||
| Master Debator Election Moderator  Democrat Omaha, NE
| |||||
| |
|
09-22-2006, 06:24 PM
| #56 | ||||
| Audaces fortuna iuvat  Moderate Northern VA
| standing back, and asking yourself if the coverage is biased in any way, it's so clearly biased to the right it makes me sick.. and I used to defend FNC. as this clip from the Daily Show points out, this is something I have noticed myself YouTube - John Stewart Kills CNN/Fox News sure it's funny, but it is so blatently obvious. | ||||
| |
|
09-23-2006, 05:52 AM
| #57 | ||||
| Junkie  Conservative Party
| Originally Posted by DosEquis and neither of them do anything for terrorism.
| ||||
| |
|
09-23-2006, 01:05 PM
| #58 | ||||
| ipsa Scientia Potestas est  Pragmatist Greensboro, NC
| Originally Posted by Pro Street I think once anyone makes an effort to get some real perspective on
 they come to realize very quickly how biased and one sided the "coverage" is on that network.I used to be the same way, defending them, etc.. and then I decided to step back and take an objective look at it | ||||
| |
|
09-23-2006, 01:43 PM
| #59 | ||||
| Lurker  Conservative NH
| Originally Posted by Thorgrim chemical markers. wow.... he really tried putting his foot down on terrorism.
| ||||
| |
|
09-23-2006, 01:53 PM
| #60 | ||||
| helluo librorum The Lab Moderator Humanist Chicago Suburbs
| Originally Posted by phreak More than the Republicans did before 9/11.
| ||||
| |
Ok.
