Pakistan...our "friend" in the war on terror....

[Donkey®]

Originally Posted by article

Pakistan: U.S. threatened to bomb us back to Stone Age
POSTED: 8:39 p.m. EDT, September 21, 2006


WASHINGTON (AP) -- President Pervez Musharraf of Pakistan says the United States threatened to bomb his country back to the Stone Age after the 9/11 attacks if he did not help America's war on terror.

Musharraf says the threat was delivered by Richard Armitage, then the deputy secretary of state, to Musharraf's intelligence director, the Pakistani leader told CBS-TV's "60 Minutes."

"The intelligence director told me that (Armitage) said, 'Be prepared to be bombed. Be prepared to go back to the Stone Age,' " Musharraf said in the interview to be shown Sunday on the CBS television network. (Watch how Armitage shook up the Pakistan intelligence chief -- 1:35)

It was insulting, Musharraf said. "I think it was a very rude remark," he told reporter Steve Kroft.

But, Musharraf said he reacted responsibly. "One has to think and take actions in the interests of the nation and that is what I did," he said.

The White House and State Department declined to comment on the conversation.

Armitage told CNN on Thursday that he never threatened to bomb Pakistan, wouldn't say such a thing and didn't have the authority to do it. Armitage said he did have a tough message for Pakistan, saying the Muslim nation was either "with us or against us," according to CNN. Armitage said he didn't know how his message was recounted so differently to Musharraf.

In a speech in January 2002, four months after the attacks on the World Trade Center and the Pentagon, Musharraf gave a speech in which he clearly came down on the side of reform at home and opposition to Islamic fundamentalism.

Pakistan to this day is considered an ally of the United States in the struggle with militant groups. Sometimes, however, Pakistan appears reluctant to go after the Taliban, which controlled neighboring Afghanistan until 2001 and has intensified its insurgency in the southern part of the country in recent months.

Musharraf is scheduled to meet on Friday at the White House with President Bush and then see Bush again next week in a three-way meeting with President Hamid Karzai of Afghanistan.

Musharraf told "60 Minutes" that Armitage's message was delivered with demands that he turn over Pakistan's border posts and bases for the U.S. military to use in the war against the Taliban in Afghanistan. Some demands were "ludicrous," such as a demand he suppress domestic expression of support for terrorism against the United States.

"If somebody is expressing views, we cannot curb the expression of views," Musharraf said.

Copyright 2006 The Associated Press. All rights reserved.This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.

Seems pretty typical to me. But that brings to light the question: How effective can someone who really doesn't care be at all effective in this so called war? I mean, the US is dedicated to the cause...and still sucks at this war...Pakistan would be even worse in my opinion.

[Nonphixion]

Effictive in the war on terror?

It's not that they don't care -- it's more like they were responsible for the funding of the attack. So it's no surprise why they were harboring Osama for so long in their country. And as well why they shuttled thousands of Al-Qeada fighters from Konduz Afghanistan into the safety of Northern Pakistan while the US was watching very closely for Bin Laden and his cohorts during the time of 2002-2003.

[Diesel66]

friend of convenience. We needed a path to fly over and some type of ally in that area. Look at our other "friends" in that area, Uzbekistan where dissenters are boiled alive.

[motivez]

I wonder if this article was the motivating factor behind this press conference being held today?