Originally Posted by JaJae He wasn't arrested because of what he was reporting on. He was arrested for disrupting a business and ignoring police orders. There is a big difference. Obviously America isn't perfect, but our laws don't require police to arrest people for reporting certain issues or speaking out ...
| |||||||
|
| Register to Post a Reply |
| | LinkBack | Thread Tools |
| | #21 | ||||
| Friend to all. Socialist Maryland ![]() ![]()
| Originally Posted by JaJae
Uh huh...so when I said about the China incident "he was ignoring a police order to leave the park" you claimed that was impossible. Must be nice to use the excuse you so easily blasted before. Your claim that this type of behavior doesn't happen in the US, I countered with "yes it does". Well guess what? It does.
__________________ www.otraw.com | ||||
| Register to Reply to This Post |
| | #22 | ||||
| Friend to all. Socialist Maryland ![]() ![]()
| Originally Posted by JaJae
Right...the bottom line is that what happens in China does happen here to some extent. Nobody ever said "it was EXACTLY the same". Reporters get detained, thrown in jail and kept from reporting stories here too...you seem to think that "we don't do it as often" is a valid excuse. It's not. | ||||
| Register to Reply to This Post |
| | #23 | ||||
| Braccae tuae aperiuntur. Reform Party NJ ![]() ![]()
| Originally Posted by Donkey® He wasn't detained, thrown in jail, etc because of what he was reporting. He was arrested because he disobeyed police orders after a business filed a written complaint on him. While the police may not have handled the situation properly the difference here between China is glaring.
In China it is mandated that the police must arrest people speaking out for certain causes. In any country you're going to have instances of police overstepping their boundaries, but that is not what happened in China. The wonderful thing about being in America is that the "victim" (if the reporter was) has the ability to speak out, defend himself and ultimately seek damages. In China, their lack of human rights prevents anything of the sort. And again, the person wasn't arrested for reporting on something. He was arrested for disrupting the business in some way which resulted in a written complaint and then he disobeyed a police order. He can have his day in court to see if he was entitled to be doing what he was doing. But I know in my state it is illegal to disrupt a business. There is also a dispute as to whether or not sidewalk he was standing on was actually owned by the business or city property. The police are saying that the Hotel actually owns the property he was on when they filed for a complaint to have him removed. One article I read said the person who shoved him out into traffic was a security guard (looked like a police officer to me though). However, when he was ultimately arrested for refusing a lawful order by a police officer (doesn't seem to be on tape) he was grabbed by the neck. I don't think that was appropriate.
__________________ No good decision was ever made in a swivel chair. Senate Majority Leader, Harry Reid: As we look back in history, the Founding Fathers would be cringing to hear people talking about eliminating earmarks. Last edited by JaJae; 08-30-2008 at 01:39 AM. | ||||
| Register to Reply to This Post |
| | #24 | ||||
| Friend to all. Socialist Maryland ![]() ![]()
| In the Chinese story, the reporter failed to listen to the police giving him orders to leave the area. That's against the law here as well. In the Chinese story, the guy wasn't even arrested or charged with anything...he was detained briefly and released. Seems like the Chinese were a little nicer than our police. | ||||
| Register to Reply to This Post |
| Register to Post a Reply |
| Bookmarks |
| Tags |
| abc, arrested |
| ||||||
| Thread Tools | |
| |
| vBulletin 3.7.2 -- Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd. | Custom Artwork and Theme (TM) 2006, Liberty Lounge |