Midweek Politics 9.27.06 - More offensive: Howard Stern or Rush Limbaugh? More...

dpakman91 · 09-27-2006, 08:23 PM

This Week's Show:

September 27, 2006

Total Running Time: 57:49

This Week's Topics:

--Howard Stern and the media bias controversy.

--The infamous Bill Clinton interview with Chris Wallace on Fox News, along with both Wallace's and Hillary Clinton's comments on it.

--What is leading to low gas prices, who will it help in the election, was it planned, and much more.

--Senators John McCain and Bill Frist contradict each other in Sunday morning interviews.

--George W. Bush says bloodshed in Iraq will be looked back at as "just a comma."

--Pat Robertson's latest prediction is of a "holy war" between Islam and Christianity.

--In an interview with Barbara Walters, Bill O'Reilly reveals he is on Al-Qaeda's "death list."

Download Page: Midweek Politics with David Pakman - 09.27.2006 - Midweek Politics Radio with David Pakman

6SpeedTA95 · 09-27-2006, 09:04 PM

Have a sticky

dpakman91 · 09-27-2006, 09:49 PM

i am doing everything i can to set up an interview with someone from the westboro baptist church (WARNING PAGE) for next week

Stylerod · 09-28-2006, 09:40 AM

Originally Posted by dpakman91

i am doing everything i can to set up an interview with someone from the westboro baptist church (WARNING PAGE) for next week

Why give them more attention???? The less press they get the less important they will think they are.

DosEquis · 09-28-2006, 10:18 AM

your sidekick guy cracks me up... he is kind of like your John Madden.

Yeah it was the left breast dave. I think if it was a tv show he'd circle it

dpakman91 · 09-28-2006, 10:28 AM

Originally Posted by DosEquis

your sidekick guy cracks me up... he is kind of like your John Madden.

Yeah it was the left breast dave. I think if it was a tv show he'd circle it

haha yeah, i've had a TON of comments about that one comment he made. he really is the producer so he runs the board and plays clips, answers phones, but we figure have a mic there for him anyway.

DosEquis · 09-28-2006, 02:44 PM

One thing that I have always wondered about is candidates who put forth millions of their own dollars to campaign for a job that pay very little in comparison.

For example in Nebraska a guy by the name of Pete Ricketts (R) (whose father owns Ameritrade) has spent nearly 5 million of his own dollars to run against registered democrat (but voted with bush 80% of the time) Ben Nelson. To my knowledge a senate job only pays like 150k a year. Why spent 5 million+ of your own money to get a job that pays 150k a year?

I mean some would say "well i just want to help the state". I am thinking local donations and foundations would be able to help tons of people across the entire state with the amount that is financing Ricketts and Nelson's campaigns.

From what i understand Ned Lemont is doing the same thing.

To me, it just doesn't add up. It is like "what is in it for you?" I just dont buy the whole "but i am doing it to help state and country" line.

SpicyMcVoodoo · 10-04-2006, 05:24 PM

Originally Posted by DosEquis

To me, it just doesn't add up. It is like "what is in it for you?" I just dont buy the whole "but i am doing it to help state and country" line.

Ego. If you're already filthy rich, what else is there to do in your life but to seek power and influence?