Search Results - THOMAS (Library of Congress) I present to you attempt #1 at increased gun control in the new Obama congress (and he hasn't even been sworn in yet!) To provide for the implementation of a system of licensing for purchasers of certain firearms and for a record of ...
| |||||||
|
| Register to Post a Reply |
| | LinkBack | Thread Tools |
| | #1 | ||||
| For those about to rock... libertarian Atlanta, GA ![]() ![]()
| HR45: Blair Holt's Firearm Licensing and Record of Sale Act of 2009 (Introduced in House) Search Results - THOMAS (Library of Congress) I present to you attempt #1 at increased gun control in the new Obama congress (and he hasn't even been sworn in yet!)
And the appeal to emotion RIGHT THERE in the bill... Congress finds that a boy sacrificed himself to save a classmate? How did they find that? That is not a REASON for the bill. Not a logical one anyway. They do this shit so people find it more difficult to vote against it. Additionally, they give numbers for gun-related crime, but not how many of those would be prevented by federal registration of guns. Ill-gotten guns won't change, and people who are legal owners of guns that use them for the powers of evil (which is rare to begin with) were still legal owners up until that point.
******************************* This is a horrible idea. First, not to bring up another potentially controversial issue, but this is how marijuana started to become illegal in the 1930's... federal issuance of licensing in order to sell the product, which they wouldn't actually issue (all applicants were denied). Putting the federal government in control of firearm licensing would basically give them first and final say on gun ownership in America. There is no provision in the bill that says they HAVE to give qualifying candidates a license, it just says they'll issue them under guidelines. It's just a proposal, and may not see the light of day, but we should be aware that these bills are out there. And we should certainly let our congressmen know how we feel about it.
__________________ http://www.corruptapedia.com/ You can call me Aaron Burr the way I drop Hamiltons. | ||||
| Register to Reply to This Post |
| | #2 | ||||
| What? Anarcho-Capitalist Oklahoma ![]() ![]()
| Interstate commerce clause apparently means congress has the ability to do whatever it wants. | ||||
| Register to Reply to This Post |
| | #3 | ||||
| Never, never, never give up Independent High Point, NC ![]()
| C'mon NRA!!! | ||||
| Register to Reply to This Post |
| | #4 | ||||
| Lurker libertarian ![]()
| To test the Constitutionality of this simply replace the word "firearm" with another Constitutionally protected item like a news paper or a Bible. Now let's see how it sounds. (5) with respect to each category of person prohibited by Federal law, or by the law of the State of residence of the applicant, from obtaining a Bible, a statement that the individual is not a person prohibited from obtaining a Bible; (6) a certification by the applicant that the applicant will keep any Bible owned by the applicant safely stored and out of the possession of persons who have not attained 18 years of age; (7) a certificate attesting to the completion at the time of application of a written Bible examination, which shall test the knowledge and ability of the applicant regarding-- (A) the safe storage of Bibles, particularly in the vicinity of persons who have not attained 18 years of age; (B) the safe handling of Bibles; (C) the use of prayer in the home and the risks associated with such use; (D) the legal responsibilities of Bible owners, including Federal, State, and local laws relating to requirements for the possession and storage of Bibles, and relating to reporting requirements with respect to Bibles; and (E) any other subjects, as the Attorney General determines to be appropriate. Now we all know Bibles and newspapers are far more dangerous than firearms because they contain ideas that might cause people to act. The pen is after all, more powerfull than the sword. Hitler, Stalin and Chairmam Mao are responaible for the murder of millions. They personally never shot anyone. they used spoken and printed words to convince others to murder for them. | ||||
| Register to Reply to This Post |
| Register to Post a Reply |
| Bookmarks |
| Tags |
| gun control |
| ||||||
| Thread Tools | |
| |
| vBulletin 3.7.4 -- Copyright ©2000 - 2010, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd. | Custom Artwork and Theme (TM) 2006, Liberty Lounge |