BBC NEWS | Asia-Pacific | UN vote backs N Korea sanctions Seems like a decent resolution. The US got the weapons embargo and China and Russia got assurance that force won't be used if NK doesn't comply. I'd like to see the details of the cargo inspection procedures... and how ...
| | #1 | ||||
| R-CH2-CH3 Republican ![]()
| UN passes sanctions against North Korea. BBC NEWS | Asia-Pacific | UN vote backs N Korea sanctions Seems like a decent resolution. The US got the weapons embargo and China and Russia got assurance that force won't be used if NK doesn't comply. I'd like to see the details of the cargo inspection procedures... and how much shit will go down once the first NK ship is boarded.
Last edited by ethyl; 10-14-2006 at 03:00 PM. | ||||
| Register to Reply to This Post |
| | #2 | ||||
| Braccae tuae aperiuntur. Reform Party NJ ![]() ![]()
| Too little. Too late. | ||||
| Register to Reply to This Post |
| | #3 | ||||
| Braccae tuae aperiuntur. Reform Party NJ ![]() ![]()
| ![]() Bolton does not look amused. | ||||
| Register to Reply to This Post |
| | #4 | ||||
| Dirty Liberal Democrat South Jersey ![]() ![]() ![]()
| That's actually pretty weak | ||||
| Register to Reply to This Post |
| | #5 | ||||
| Common Sense Conservative Realist ![]()
| |||||
| Register to Reply to This Post |
| | #6 | ||||
| Banned Progressive Philadelphia, PA ![]()
| But surely, Bush and the Republicans will come to the rescue...? | ||||
| Register to Reply to This Post |
| | #7 | ||||
| Braccae tuae aperiuntur. Reform Party NJ ![]() ![]()
| This isn't something Bush, Republicans, the next president or Democrats can fix. This is a global problem and something we all need a hand in. We've tried the one on one thing with N. Korea before and it only made matters worse... much worse. The world needs to wise up. | ||||
| Register to Reply to This Post |
| | #8 | ||||
| R-CH2-CH3 Republican ![]()
| |||||
| Register to Reply to This Post |
| | #9 | ||||
| Banned Progressive Philadelphia, PA ![]()
| Originally Posted by JaJae The US is the leader of the free world and we can't fix it?
So are we going to have to grovel to the Chinese and Russians to fix it for us? How honorable | ||||
| Register to Reply to This Post |
| | #10 | ||||
| Braccae tuae aperiuntur. Reform Party NJ ![]() ![]()
| Originally Posted by Thorgrim grovel?
How about make this a UN problem and have the world stand firm and fix the problem that is N. Korea? I know the UN sucks, but we need to get them more involved and less PC on these issues. | ||||
| Register to Reply to This Post |
| | #11 | ||||
| Administrator libertarian Oklahoma ![]()
| The US tried for 8 years alone under Clinton, we tried 2 years alone under Bush...alone didn't work. We have 6 party talks. We have to use the world and put pressure on them. Sanctions are the only real option so we didn't have much of a choice. | ||||
| Register to Reply to This Post |
| | #12 | ||||
| Banned Progressive Philadelphia, PA ![]()
| Originally Posted by JaJae See, China and Russia both want the NKorean government to stand, so...they'd be foolish to try and make moves for regime change
The Russians have almost nothing to fear from the NKorea situation, if anyone would be hit, it would be Japan/SK or smuggled to the US or Israel...and if NK breaks down the refugees will go to China, not Russia The Chinese realize that worrisome fact, but a united capitalist Korea and Japan, allied with the US is much more worrisome Japan couldn't anything if it wanted because China would annihilate them, SK couldn't do anything without NK annihilating them So it's just us...and what did we do? Nothing | ||||
| Register to Reply to This Post |
| | #13 | ||||
| Braccae tuae aperiuntur. Reform Party NJ ![]() ![]()
| We're partly responsible for this with our assinine "diplomacy." Giving North Korea two nuclear reactors, $5 billion and promising to end weapons inspections for half a decade wasn't the brightest idea to come out of the oval office. | ||||
| Register to Reply to This Post |
| | #14 | ||||
| Banned Progressive Philadelphia, PA ![]()
| It stalled their program for 6 years, which was a much better option than restarting the Korea War If we had focused on them in 2001-2002 instead of Iraq, there wouldn't be a problem today...and we had a better rationale in 2002 than in 1994 for a military strike in NK "We can't let nukes have a chance of slipping into the hands of Al-Qaeda" the world was still behind us, we could have solved it Instead, we ignored them...that was the assinine policy | ||||
| Register to Reply to This Post |
| | #15 | ||||
| Administrator libertarian Oklahoma ![]()
| |||||
| Register to Reply to This Post |
| | #16 | ||||
| Braccae tuae aperiuntur. Reform Party NJ ![]() ![]()
| |||||
| Register to Reply to This Post |
| | #17 | ||||
| Banned Progressive Philadelphia, PA ![]()
| The graphite-moderated nuclear power plants were shut down and stopped from developing nuclear material, and the rods were handed over, significantly halting nuclear research It was only AFTER the deal fell apart under Bush that the NK had any reasonable nuclear program that had any short-term chances of success | ||||
| Register to Reply to This Post |
| | #18 | ||||
| Braccae tuae aperiuntur. Reform Party NJ ![]() ![]()
| North Korea totally rejects UN sanctions and threatens war!
| ||||
| Register to Reply to This Post |
| | #19 | ||||
| Administrator libertarian Oklahoma ![]()
| Originally Posted by Thorgrim Keep dreaming.
| ||||
| Register to Reply to This Post |
| | #20 | ||||
| ipsa Scientia Potestas est Pragmatist North Carolina ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
| More like the result of failed foreign policy with North Korea. There's very little effect economic sanctions can have on such an impoverished nation, and all that will happen is their already practically starving people will continue to starve more. The elite ruling class, the military, and of course, Kim Jong Il will continue to live in relative luxury while his people continue to suffer. | ||||
| Register to Reply to This Post |