Originally Posted by 7960 Actually, when I typed "one of two things happened" you misunderstood what I meant by "one." I define "one" to mean "a psycho lying whore killed a perfectly viable baby and is now using a technicality to get away with it." Please add that to your ...
| |||||||
|
| Register to Post a Reply |
| | LinkBack | Thread Tools |
| | #61 | ||||
| Banned - Self Imposed Progressive Philadelphia, PA ![]() ![]()
| Originally Posted by 7960 too bad i was responding to "sentencing" not your "one of two things happened"
| ||||
| Register to Reply to This Post |
| | #62 | ||||
| Dirty Liberal Democrat South Jersey ![]() ![]() ![]()
| Honestly, I think she should have been charged with murder. At that point the child was a child. It was fully developed and capable of surviving outside of the womb without any outside help. It was a living, breating, mentally aware person. She knew it and she shot the baby. What if the baby had moved 6 inches down the vaginal canal? would it have been murder then? | ||||
| Register to Reply to This Post |
| | #63 | ||||
| ..... your a worthless poster Realist ![]() ![]()
| Your bad... I define "sentencing" as "one of two things happened." And if you disagree that I believe "sentencing" means "one of two things happened" then you're going to have to get in my brain and prove that's not what I thought it meant. | ||||
| Register to Reply to This Post |
| | #64 | ||||
| ..... your a worthless poster Realist ![]() ![]()
| Originally Posted by WickedLou9 it's not a baby until it breathes and isn't attached by an umbilical cord.... or unless someone not the mother or a legal doctor kills it
| ||||
| Register to Reply to This Post |
| | #65 | ||||
| Dirty Liberal Democrat South Jersey ![]() ![]() ![]()
| |||||
| Register to Reply to This Post |
| | #66 | ||||
| ..... your a worthless poster Realist ![]() ![]()
| |||||
| Register to Reply to This Post |
| | #67 | ||||
| Bokonist Independent Kansas City ![]()
| for certain a crime was committed. But I see no benefit in locking her up, other than for her own. It's not like she's at much of a risk to shoot anyone else in the stomach, and I don't think we need to send a message that shooting yourself in the stomach is a bad idea. Her actions are deplorable, but paying for her to be in a cell would make about as much sense as paying for a person who tried to commit suicide in a cell, for that too is a crime. | ||||
| Register to Reply to This Post |
| | #68 | ||||
| ..... your a worthless poster Realist ![]() ![]()
| Originally Posted by nbiggershaft I *HATE* my neighbor. I've never hated anyone else in my life, but I *HATE* him. I dream about hurting him and I usually wake up laughing. I've never wanted to hurt or kill anyone else, just him. I've told family and friends if I meet him and nobody else is around I'm going to kill him. A few times I've waited by the corner to see if he'd come by walking his dog. So far he hasn't, but one of these days he will and I'll get him.
When I finally kill him and someone posts on this board "7960 killed his neighbor " are you going to post "I see no benefit in locking him up, other than for his own. It's not like he's at much of a risk to kill anyone else, and I don't think we need to send a message that killing your neighbor is a bad idea. His actions are deplorable, but paying for him to be in a cell would make about as much sense as paying for a person who tried to commit suicide in a cell, for that too is a crime"? | ||||
| Register to Reply to This Post |
| | #69 | ||||
| Bokonist Independent Kansas City ![]()
| Originally Posted by 7960 No because locking you up with discourage others from killing their neighbors.
| ||||
| Register to Reply to This Post |
| | #70 | ||||
| Common Sense Conservative Realist ![]()
| |||||
| Register to Reply to This Post |
| | #71 | ||||
| ..... your a worthless poster Realist ![]() ![]()
| |||||
| Register to Reply to This Post |
| | #72 | ||||
| Master Debator Election Moderator Democrat Omaha, NE ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
| Originally Posted by 6SpeedTA95 Let us not leave out the psycho pro-lifers who blow themselves up at abortion clinics and kill doctors to give themselves a bad name.
I am going to have to go with scrum on this one. ![]() Thought what she did was f-ed up and she should be convicted of something. | ||||
| Register to Reply to This Post |
| | #73 | ||||
| ..... your a worthless poster Realist ![]() ![]()
| Originally Posted by DosEquis
![]() The law says "makes a criminal out of 'any person [to] administer to, or cause … any drug or other thing' with intent to destroy an unborn child." To say the law should have said "any person, including the mother..." would open more doors. Why doesn't it say "any person, including the mother or father..." or "any person, including the mother, father, or grandparents..." or "any person, including the mother, father, grandparents, or cashier at the local Piggly Wiggly..." Putting a qualifier on it means you have to define all possibilities. Saying "any person" means "any person"...it means me, you, the mother...*any* person. To qualify it by adding "including the mother" means you'd have to add every other person. If you leave off any person then that person is excluded from the law. | ||||
| Register to Reply to This Post |
| | #74 | ||||
| ipsa Scientia Potestas est Pragmatist North Carolina ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
| Lets keep it civil please. | ||||
| Register to Reply to This Post |
| vBulletin 3.7.4 -- Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd. | Custom Artwork and Theme (TM) 2006, Liberty Lounge |