Public Arab Tide turns in favor of Hezbollah - Page 7

Kytro · 08-01-2006, 09:43 AM

What is the context of the photo? Why was Annan meeting him

ballz2wallz · 08-01-2006, 09:51 AM

Originally Posted by Kytro

What is the context of the photo? Why was Annan meeting him

why didn't you ask that question regarding rumsfeld and saddam?

this is all i could find about this picture you asked about:

Syrian and Lebanese officials then persuaded UN Secretary-General Kofi Annan to personally meet with Nasrallah during his visit to Lebanon--in effect crowning him as the primary political force in the south.

"Hezbollah, Amal Compete for Supremacy" (July 2000)

Kytro · 08-01-2006, 09:56 AM

Originally Posted by ballz2wallz

why didn't you ask that question regarding rumsfeld and saddam?

I am aware of that photo, and have seen it before. I didn't know anything about the other one.

Okay, so he met him as part of some tour. I'm not sure meeting implies support as such.

The UN have been pretty critical of the hezbollah attacks

kinggovernor · 08-01-2006, 01:09 PM

Originally Posted by Kytro

Okay, so he met him as part of some tour. I'm not sure meeting implies support as such.

The UN have been pretty critical of the hezbollah attacks

it was recognition that a terrorist was the leader of the country

Donkey® · 08-01-2006, 01:43 PM

Originally Posted by kinggovernor

it was recognition that a terrorist was the leader of the country

He met the leader of the political party that is part of the Lebanese government. Stop telling these people to adopt democracy if you're going to act like assholes when they do.

kinggovernor · 08-01-2006, 02:25 PM

Originally Posted by Donkey®

He met the leader of the political party that is part of the Lebanese government. Stop telling these people to adopt democracy if you're going to act like assholes when they do.

he is still a terrorist irregardless of whether he has majority supporty. And because he does it makes me have no sympathy for the people of lebabon

motivez · 08-01-2006, 06:22 PM

Originally Posted by kinggovernor

he is still a terrorist irregardless of whether he has majority supporty. And because he does it makes me have no sympathy for the people of lebabon

So you're perfectly acceptable with guilt by what is ultimately a very loose assosciation?

What does that say about you being in the military and some military personnel raping or murdering innocent civilians?

btw, I realize that's not a fair question, so dont take it personally, but it illustrates my point well when it comes to your logical fallacy.

Thorgrim · 08-01-2006, 07:03 PM

Originally Posted by kinggovernor

he is still a terrorist irregardless of whether he has majority supporty. And because he does it makes me have no sympathy for the people of lebabon

So we could murder hundreds of thousands of Christians and you would have no problem?

archangel003 · 08-01-2006, 08:31 PM

Originally Posted by Thorgrim

So we could murder hundreds of thousands of Christians and you would have no problem?

Israel's collaterally killed less than 1000 civilians after two and a half weeks of intense offensive action in a densely populated area. Pull your head out of your ass and get some perspective.

User kicked from this thread for the above post.
Let's all try to be a bit more civil. Keep responses directed towards the subject and not the posters

Thorgrim · 08-01-2006, 08:46 PM

Originally Posted by archangel003

Israel's collaterally killed less than 1000 civilians after two and a half weeks of intense offensive action in a densely populated area. Pull your head out of your ass and get some perspective.

densely populated? Bangladesh is densely populated, poor rural farmers are not densely populated

also, we are talking about kg's saying he has no sympathy for Lebanon

thanks for the kind words

Kytro · 08-01-2006, 08:57 PM

Depends what you consider terrosism.

In 2000 how many nations consider hezbollah to be terrorists?

Even now it isn't a huge number.

It's a matter of perspective, some consider what Israel does as terrorism (using fear to achieve a political change)

kinggovernor · 08-02-2006, 12:30 AM

Originally Posted by motivez

So you're perfectly acceptable with guilt by what is ultimately a very loose assosciation?

What does that say about you being in the military and some military personnel raping or murdering innocent civilians?

btw, I realize that's not a fair question, so dont take it personally, but it illustrates my point well when it comes to your logical fallacy.

I don't association with them, I would report them and enjoy seeing them head to ft. leavonworth

kinggovernor · 08-02-2006, 12:30 AM

Originally Posted by Thorgrim

So we could murder hundreds of thousands of Christians and you would have no problem?

that isn;t going to happen, but not really

Thorgrim · 08-02-2006, 12:31 AM

Originally Posted by kinggovernor

that isn;t going to happen, but not really

So christian souls mean nothing to you, what is your faith exactly?

kinggovernor · 08-02-2006, 12:43 AM

Originally Posted by Thorgrim

So christian souls mean nothing to you, what is your faith exactly?

its not that they mean nothing to me, they are still humans, but if they openly support this shit don't complain when it comes back on you. and i don't have a faith

motivez · 08-02-2006, 03:33 AM

Originally Posted by kinggovernor

I don't association with them, I would report them and enjoy seeing them head to ft. leavonworth

And many of these Lebanese people do not assosciate with the militant aspect of Hezbollah, so that means they deserve to die? The main difference is they don't really have anyone to "report" things to.

If you use the same logic, it doesn't matter that you don't have an official assosciation, or fully support their actions.. you would be just as condemnable for them as these civilians who are dying now

ballz2wallz · 08-02-2006, 09:27 AM

Lebanese website blames Hizbullah for Qana deaths

Anti-Syrian elements in Lebanon openly point finger at Hizbullah as guilty of killing of dozens of civilians in order to curtail plans for disarming group. 'Hizbullah has placed rocket launcher on building's roof and brought invalid children inside in bid to provoke Israeli response,' they write

Thorgrim · 08-02-2006, 09:52 AM

Originally Posted by ballz2wallz

Lebanese website blames Hizbullah for Qana deaths

Anti-Syrian elements in Lebanon openly point finger at Hizbullah as guilty of killing of dozens of civilians in order to curtail plans for disarming group. 'Hizbullah has placed rocket launcher on building's roof and brought invalid children inside in bid to provoke Israeli response,' they write

The PM got elected for being very anti-syrian...he has not suggested such things, as have most lebanese

however, remember there are still veterans around who had their best friends killed by Hezbollah...and Hezbollah veterans who had their best friends killed by Druze, Christians, etc

Ofcourse SOMEONE is going to post an article like that, they were butchering each other not too long ago

kinggovernor · 08-02-2006, 10:46 AM

Originally Posted by Kytro

Depends what you consider terrosism.

In 2000 how many nations consider hezbollah to be terrorists?

hezbollah has been considered a terrorist organization since its inception in 1982

kinggovernor · 08-02-2006, 10:48 AM

Originally Posted by motivez

And many of these Lebanese people do not assosciate with the militant aspect of Hezbollah, so that means they deserve to die? The main difference is they don't really have anyone to "report" things to.

If you use the same logic, it doesn't matter that you don't have an official assosciation, or fully support their actions.. you would be just as condemnable for them as these civilians who are dying now

not at all. If I saw said activities it would be my duty to report it and I would be criminally charged if I didn't. Look at the haditha investigation two officers were charged because the investigators felt they were trying to cover up