So, who caught this in the state of the union and also in his comments with Republicans? It's been way too long since we've built a new nuclear power plant, and I think if the liberals in France can get over it and use nuclear power to their advantage, there's ...
| | #1 | ||||
| ipsa Scientia Potestas est Pragmatist North Carolina ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
| Nuclear energy So, who caught this in the state of the union and also in his comments with Republicans? It's been way too long since we've built a new nuclear power plant, and I think if the liberals in France can get over it and use nuclear power to their advantage, there's no reason the environmentalists here can't either.... While a solution for the waste is needed, the fact remains that it's a much cleaner source of energy than "clean coal" (which is a myth), or even things like hybrid cars running off electricity generated by things like coal power plants.. Is there any rational (not political) reason to oppose the creation of new nuclear power plants? The only one I can really think of is that they make a nice target for terrorists, but I don't think that should deter us from securing our energy future. I think a lot of people (irrationally) will be against one if it's being built in "their backyard" .. but I don't think that's a good enough reason. | ||||
| Register to Reply to This Post |
| | #2 | ||||
| Friend to all. Socialist Maryland ![]() ![]()
| Originally Posted by motivez
I keep hearing about people wanting to build more plants (on both sides of the aisle) yet I have yet to see any actually built in a long time.
__________________ www.otraw.com | ||||
| Register to Reply to This Post |
| | #3 | ||||
| Braccae tuae aperiuntur. Reform Party ![]() ![]() ![]()
| They can't get them off the ground due to environmentalist and local pressure. There's a lot of "not in my backyard" mentality regarding nuclear power plants. A lot of states even have bans on nuclear power and it's hard to get it overturned.
__________________ "I don't know where these people got their scientific education, but where I come from, if your theory can't predict or explain the observed facts, it's wrong." | ||||
| Register to Reply to This Post |
| | #4 | ||||
| Estranged Yankee Republican Independent New England ![]() ![]()
| |||||
| Register to Reply to This Post |
| | #5 | ||||
| Audaces fortuna iuvat Moderate Northern VA ![]()
| Originally Posted by The Esteemed Gentleman This, pretty much. throw in the costs and the build time (someone told me once it's about a decade to become fully operational?)
Some states, like WV, PA, and others have a HUGE opposition due to other resources' lobbies being strong in the area. I live about 30mi from the nearest nuclear plant, and never had any worries. In fact the lake that borders it is a popular local attraction and most are ignorant to the fact that there's one there. | ||||
| Register to Reply to This Post |
| | #6 | ||||
| ipsa Scientia Potestas est Pragmatist North Carolina ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
| Holy crap it's Pro Street I thought we had a zombie thread for a second! | ||||
| Register to Reply to This Post |
| | #7 | ||||
| Master Debator Election Moderator Democrat Omaha, NE ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
| Problem is... safe storage or not... people don't want the waste in their states. | ||||
| Register to Reply to This Post |
| | #8 | ||||
| Estranged Yankee Republican Independent New England ![]() ![]()
| |||||
| Register to Reply to This Post |
| | #9 | ||||
| Master Debator Election Moderator Democrat Omaha, NE ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
| Originally Posted by The Esteemed Gentleman Its slower. People do smoke cigarettes too...
Radiant is quickly and more obvious. I am not sure many people claim the general public is smart.. | ||||
| Register to Reply to This Post |
| | #10 | ||||
| Estranged Yankee Republican Independent New England ![]() ![]()
| Originally Posted by DosEquis Yeah but the waste won't harm anyone unless there is a disaster of epic proportions. Coal and oil (or cigarettes) do harm as part of their standard modus operandi.
Truth be told, I have mixed feelings on this issue. I really can't decide. Every time I make up my mind in favor of your assertion, they do something that really rallies my faith in them. Of course, they almost immediately squander it soon thereafter, but the momentary flashes of brilliance keeps the idealist in my alive. | ||||
| Register to Reply to This Post |
| | #11 | ||||
| Guest
| Nuclear power would be fantastic and we can reuse what was once waste numerous times in the power generation process with today's reactors. I think we should set clear and attainable goals with regard to nuclear energy and if people dont want them by their houses, maybe we spend some money on new grid infrastructure to put these things out in places like the texas/ok panhandles where you can literally drive for miles upon miles and see no homes. People may have to drive 10, 15 or 20 miles to work but nuke power plant employees get compensated nicely and most would drive without any hesitation. The fact is we need to tap all of our energy resources in the coming decades in order to keep energy affordable. It also takes 7 to 10 years to build a plant, so lets start now. | ||||
| Register to Reply to This Post |
| Register to Post a Reply |
| Bookmarks |
| Tags |
| energy, energy crisis, nuclear energy, obama, potus, sotu, state of the union |
| ||||||
| Thread Tools | |
| |
| vBulletin 3.7.4 -- Copyright ©2000 - 2010, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd. | Custom Artwork and Theme (TM) 2006, Liberty Lounge |