hey frank! history channel..right now

[DosEquis]

Show called Fearless planet...right now...sahara desert.. MILLIONS of years ago. Fossils of a sawfish, lung fish, turtle shells, etc. Marine life... sahara desert. ... millions of years ago.. evidence. 95 million years ago. Changes of global level. continents...including africa..migrating.

So what the fuck is your major malfunction?

[The Great Catpiss]

Originally Posted by DosEquis

Show called Fearless planet...right now...sahara desert.. MILLIONS of years ago. Fossils of a sawfish, lung fish, turtle shells, etc. Marine life... sahara desert. ... millions of years ago.. evidence. 95 million years ago. Changes of global level. continents...including africa..migrating.

So what the fuck is your major malfunction?

God planted that stuff there to create doubt.

You see... It's a game God likes to play with us peons. If you lose you burn in hell. It's hillarious.

[Frank Cox]

Originally Posted by DosEquis

Show called Fearless planet...right now...sahara desert.. MILLIONS of years ago. Fossils of a sawfish, lung fish, turtle shells, etc. Marine life... sahara desert. ... millions of years ago.. evidence. 95 million years ago. Changes of global level. continents...including africa..migrating.

So what the fuck is your major malfunction?

Please don't use that language. it offends me and it shows your hatred and ignorance.

I have made fossils and i am not millions of years old. Go watch the Videos at ansersingenesis.org and learn the other side of the argument.

I am not a sheep and do not believe that everything on tv is necessarily true. You may not know this but Barney the Purple dinosaur is just a guy in a suit, really and there is no Santa Claus.

if you want to know about continents moving ask NASA's go to guy, Dr . John Baumgarnder, the world's foremost expert on the subject, he believes that Noah's flood cause the continents to move , the valleys to drop and the mountains to rise. Even though NASA anf the European Space Agency and every college on earth that can afford ot use the Tara supercomputing program he invented US News and world report are the only ones to ever interview him in the secular media.

[Frank Cox]

BYW the colecanth that was once the "proof ' of fish to amphibian evolution is alive and well and is just a fish so trying to say a lungfish is a "missing link" is considered stupid by most evolutionists, the only ones that hold on to it are the crazies like the History channel.

And did they explain to you how the genetic code came to be?

[JDTC]

Originally Posted by The Great Catpiss

God planted that stuff there to create doubt.

You see... It's a game God likes to play with us peons. If you lose you burn in hell. It's hillarious.

Cosmic Sims.

[Laz777]

Wow! The television says "millions of years ago" over and over and you believe it. Hitler said that people are more apt to believe a big lie verses a small lie and the more one repeats something the more the people believe it. I bet you think the Grand Canyon is millions of years old also.

-Laz.

[Man Bear Pig]

Originally Posted by Laz777

Wow! The television says "millions of years ago" over and over and you believe it. Hitler said that people are more apt to believe a big lie verses a small lie and the more one repeats something the more the people believe it. I bet you think the Grand Canyon is millions of years old also.

-Laz.

No, actually I can open up any science book, or better yet, any peer review journal on the subject, read their methodologies and replicate their test. The Grand Canyon is millions of years old. Do you know of any isotopic methodologies demonstrating the world is only 6000 years old? I am sure the Discovery Institute is hard at work....

[The Great Catpiss]

Originally Posted by Man Bear Pig

No, actually I can open up any science book, or better yet, any peer review journal on the subject, read their methodologies and replicate their test. The Grand Canyon is millions of years old. Do you know of any isotopic methodologies demonstrating the world is only 6000 years old? I am sure the Discovery Institute is hard at work....

The minute some scientist gets high and claims he can prove the earth is only 6000 years old, I am sure he will be quoted a lot and referred to as the top expert on the subject.

[Frank Cox]

The more an evolutionists realizes that everything he ever knew is wrong the more he curses and the more hateful he becomes and the dumber the arguments get.

The TV said
I believe it!
That settles it!

LOL!!!!!!!!!!!!

I have mdde you think, does it hurt?

[Laz777]

No, actually I can open up any science book, or better yet, any peer review journal on the subject, read their methodologies and replicate their test. The Grand Canyon is millions of years old. Do you know of any isotopic methodologies demonstrating the world is only 6000 years old? I am sure the Discovery Institute is hard at work....

I love how people bring up the peer review process and act as if it is some magical, infallible process which proves anything and everything beyond all doubt. How did you like the Climategate emails? They prove the peer review process has been perverted by big money and political agendas. The peer review process is no longer working the way it was supposed to. When the opposite view is rejected not on merit but because it refutes what you want to be true then peer review becomes worthless.

-Laz.

[Frank Cox]

Originally Posted by The Great Catpiss

God planted that stuff there to create doubt.

You see... It's a game God likes to play with us peons. If you lose you burn in hell. It's hillarious.

Only a real idiot thinks that animals lay around for millions of years waiting to fossilize. All someone has to do to is broadcast information to you through the idiot box and you believe it.

God is not the one who confused you and the evidence makes perfect sense from a biblical world view. You could care less about science, truth, or common sense, you are hyper religious.

[Frank Cox]

Originally Posted by The Great Catpiss

The minute some scientist gets high and claims he can prove the earth is only 6000 years old, I am sure he will be quoted a lot and referred to as the top expert on the subject.

It has happened but you are a religious person totally uninterested in science. The fact it has happened will mean nothing to you because you don't think, you simply believe as you are told to believe.

Magazine nor science journal editiors are supposed to have an opinion, they are supposed to report the findings of scientists and let you decide which is more credible. In your empty headed statement you are saying the real experts are the magazins editors, not the scientists. There are tens of thousands of very qualified scientists who do believe and have very credible arguments for the earth being 6000 years old but you never heard them because of this discrimination and brainwashing and you like being lied to and brainwashed. If you were a curious person instead of a sheep who belives what ever the cool people do so you too can be cool you would seek the truth. You like being amoral and if you found the God of the Bible really is God you would be bound to obey him.



No one can prove the earth is any paticular age, only a person with no concept of science would ever claim that. The age of the earth is an interpretaion. not a fact. The interpretation of the creationists in 1835 was that it was 6000 years old. They started with the same assumption all the laws of science are based on, the Bible. That is why no evolutionists ever founded a single law of science. The evidence supports that view even according to some famous evolutionists.
Actually the only major media outletI am aware of ever honest enough to report a man who is the best in the world at his field of science and is a creationist is the is US NEWS and World Report.

US News and the Geophysics of God

Do a search for his man and see what NASA thinks of him. Little people make these kind of attacks and when it blows up in their face they just get mad and whine. Impress me, be honest. This guy is the man NASA goes to , he is the fair hair golden boy and this idea you have that it is science promoting millions of years is nonsense, the vast majority of the methods to estimate the age of the earth disprove the evolutionary timescale.

Read the history of Lyell and Darwin and then see what Gould , Agers and Eldredge said about him. Darwin based his whole so called theory on a man discredited so completely by secular geology that he is not considered anything but a con man. Secular geology freely admits they were all conned for 150 years by a crooked lawyer and you don't question them for a second. That is so insane I have no words for it.

[wanna be drummer]

So for the creationists here...you literally don't think the continents ever drifted or were once apart...ever?

[senoritatessa]

Originally Posted by The Great Catpiss

God planted that stuff there to create doubt.

You see... It's a game God likes to play with us peons. If you lose you burn in hell. It's hillarious.

i disagree. i believe that he created that too, at a different time. he left it here to show us just how precious we are to him, we are alive and all of these marvelous creatures are not. i do believe that this earth is trillions of years old, if not more, and things change to suit their environment, just not to the extent of not being under the headship and control of God.

[wanna be drummer]

The Universe isn't even trillions of years old...

[senoritatessa]

the earth was definiteley one continent at one point in time. true science can be found in the bible, like the earth being round, and the planets revolving around the sun. its really amazing what you can find when you really study and look for things.

[senoritatessa]

well... i haven't been on history channel in a while. or nat geo. it was either billions or trillions thank you for correcting me.

[senoritatessa]

Originally Posted by Frank Cox

BYW the colecanth that was once the "proof ' of fish to amphibian evolution is alive and well and is just a fish so trying to say a lungfish is a "missing link" is considered stupid by most evolutionists, the only ones that hold on to it are the crazies like the History channel.

And did they explain to you how the genetic code came to be?

genetic code is encoded by God. see dna is like long threads with genes that "knit" the human body through protein synthesis. i believe this can be found in psalms.

[Frank Cox]

Originally Posted by wanna be drummer

So for the creationists here...you literally don't think the continents ever drifted or were once apart...ever?

Would you say the man NASA considers to be the worlds best geophysicist believes the creationist theory of Plate Tectonics ? The theory based on Genesis 1:9?

Gen 1:9 And God said, Let the waters under the heaven be gathered together unto one place, and let the dry land appear: and it was so.
Gen 1:10 And God called the dry land Earth; and the gathering together of the waters called he Seas: and God saw that it was good.

Do you not think that creationist believe the theory that was introduced to the world in 1859 by the Italian American scientist Antonio Snider and effectively silenced until secularist finally condoned the con job of Lyell?
Only the French would publish such an anti-evolution, pro-Bible idea.
Evolution set back Mendel's Genetics and Snider's Pangaea for many decades.

That is about as ignorant a question as one could ask. It took secularist over 100 years to start accepting it because the theory is based on Noah's Flood and so is the supercomputer program for Plate Tectonics which was created by the man US News and World Report called the world's foremost expert in super computer modeling of Plate Tectonics. He is NASA's fair haired golden boy, the man they trust with earthquake predictions and they pay him an enormous sum even though he refuses to work full time because he spends half his life writing scintific papers in support of creationism.

You are just way to brainwashed to ever grasp the role of assumptions in the study of the past. One man programs Terra with the assumption the Bible is true and gets Noah's Flood, the other the assumption of millions of years and lots of floods, it works either way, the science is the same..

Many secularist hate it because there is no known law of physics that caused the plate to start moving but the miracle of the flood fits perfectly, plus it is a creationist theory to start with.

I hate to disappoint you but many of the worlds best scientist are creationists and to make these moronic claims like creationists don't believe the animals they discovered and coined the name of existed, or don't believe in fossils, or geophysics when they introduced the theory is just hate speech you are repeating.

[senoritatessa]

Originally Posted by The Great Catpiss

If you lose you burn in hell. It's hillarious.

ummmm..... no. i can't believe that someone who says their a christian can actually say something so........ yes i can believe it. being rude implies feeling threatened, ON BOTH SIDES! be confident. please.