Originally Posted by ballz2wallz
Perhaps I confused you. I'd have no problem with this:
But did you look at the examples given? Like claiming an organization who supports the ownership of guns like the NRA, for instance, is a terrorist organization and arresting anyone involved with them?
I don't see how anyone can think that's ok, even if they don't like organizations like that. But if the POWER is there, then there's nothing to stop an overzealous president, be it Hilary or Hitler, from doing those things.
And yet people are still ok with the prez having those powers? How is that not seen as totalitarian/authoritarian?