IEA to everyone "Build nuclear power plants" - Page 2
Originally Posted by KatKanPlay NO more like the power companies sueing the windfarms... it is illegal where I live. link...
Originally Posted by KatKanPlay NO more like the power companies sueing the windfarms... it is illegal where I live. link...
11-04-2006, 02:17 AM
| #21 | ||||
| Junkie  Conservative Party 
| Originally Posted by KatKanPlay link 
| ||||
     |
|
11-04-2006, 02:28 AM
| #22 | ||||
| Baka  Idealist Adelaide, Australia
| Originally Posted by ethyl
Maybe , that is against the NPT though | ||||
| |
|
11-04-2006, 07:10 AM
| #23 | ||||
| minor irritant &/or non-entity News Moderator Contrarian Birmingham, UK
| Originally Posted by cited article What do you think that is supposed to mean?
Perhaps its supposed to imply that the waste can be dumped in the uranium mines | ||||
| |
|
11-04-2006, 12:15 PM
| #24 | ||||
| Dirty Liberal  Democrat South Jersey
| Originally Posted by KatKanPlay I think he was talking about the proposed windfarm off of cape cod, MA. all the rich people on Nantucket are fighting it because they think it will be ugly.
| ||||
| |
|
11-04-2006, 01:16 PM
| #25 | ||||
| I DIDNT KNOW THAT  Corpus Christi, Texas
| Originally Posted by Diesel66 I dont have time to look this up right now. I live in a very windy city on the Texas gulf coast, and an individual here CANNOT supply their own power through wind generation.
| ||||
| |
|
11-05-2006, 12:50 AM
| #26 | ||||
| Friend to all.  Socialist Maryland
| Originally Posted by WickedLou9
If it doesn't matter why aren't people allowed to make their own? | ||||
| |
|
11-06-2006, 10:00 AM
| #27 | ||||
| Dirty Liberal Democrat South Jersey
| Originally Posted by Donkey® They are.. unless they use a method that is also used to create nuclear bombs. There are other ways to enrich uranium to be used for nuclear power. The system that Iran is using can be very easily switched over to make high enriched uranium for nuclear weapons.
| ||||
| |
|
11-06-2006, 11:13 AM
| #28 | ||||
| Bokonist  Independent Kansas City
| Originally Posted by Donkey® Hamburgers do not equal nuclear weapons. A better comparison would be, you are allowed to have iron and steel at your house for cars and such. You are not allowed to use it to make an anti-aircraft gun on your lawn.
| ||||
| |
|
11-06-2006, 11:17 AM
| #29 | ||||
| Bokonist Independent Kansas City
| Originally Posted by Diesel66
 A couple rich people not wanting to ruin their view is not shaping the countries energy policy. | ||||
| |
|
11-06-2006, 06:49 PM
| #30 | ||||
| Friend to all. Socialist Maryland
| Originally Posted by WickedLou9
So what? That doesn't mean they'll use it for those purposes. | ||||
| |
|
11-06-2006, 06:49 PM
| #31 | ||||
| Friend to all. Socialist Maryland
| Originally Posted by nbiggershaft
Nuclear power != nuclear weapons. | ||||
| |
|
11-06-2006, 06:51 PM
| #32 | ||||
| Dirty Liberal Democrat South Jersey
| Originally Posted by Donkey® That's just being naive. Espcecially when we offered them a more economical way to get the nuclear fuel that they need and they refused.
| ||||
| |
|
11-06-2006, 07:07 PM
| #33 | ||||
| Friend to all. Socialist Maryland
| Originally Posted by WickedLou9
I have no issue with them wanting to do it themselves. National pride is a good thing. The whole "we don't trust Iran" argument is stupid because we trust Pakistan and Israel and India...they aren't bastians of anti-terror either. We don't trust Iran because we don't like them...they don't trust us either but nobody cares about their point of view, right? | ||||
| |
|
11-06-2006, 09:39 PM
| #34 | ||||
| Baka Idealist Adelaide, Australia
| Originally Posted by Donkey® Only when not taken to extreme
| ||||
| |
| vBulletin 3.7.4 -- Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd. | Custom Artwork and Theme (TM) 2006, Liberty Lounge |
their reasons for not signing the NPT.
Nuclear power is nuclear power. It matters not how you obtain the fuel to run the reactors.
