Originally Posted by SoFlaJDM the democrats didn't even do a good job pre-election... they could have walked away with this with an easy 5 more house seats and maybe another senate seat if they actually learned how to campaign However, we did pull off an amazing win in the Senate ...
| | #181 | ||||
| Unite for Dems or Liberty Dies Progressive Philadelphia, PA ![]() ![]()
| Originally Posted by SoFlaJDM However, we did pull off an amazing win in the Senate
6 seats on that battleground? We won 15 seats that were competitive races at one point We lost 2 seats that were competitive at one point 15-2? That's pretty amazing Also, we lost zero seats In the House, yeah we lost a few we should have won, but we won a few that are simply amazing wins that will be huge down the road...NH01 and NH02? wow IA-02, NY-19 (who sang on the colbert report) Those were not only longshots, but they are seats that are going to stay Democratic for a long long time (unless they redistrict or something) Those weren't the only ones, 14 others aren't going to switch for a long time either (i wont list them again), thats 18 seats AT LEAST (still waiting on some results) that are wave-resistant, the only reason they had republicans were that people loved their incumbents even though the district became democratic Guys like Joe Sestak, Netroots/Dailykos candidates, are in seats that have such an advantage...why the hell would they elect a Republican? They really have no reason | ||||
| Register to Reply to This Post |
| | #182 | ||||
| Better Dead than Red Democrat "My friends, we’ve got them just where we want them.” ![]()
| yeah like i said, we did a great job, but we could have done so much better | ||||
| Register to Reply to This Post |
| Register to Post a Reply |
| Bookmarks |
| Tags |
| election results, election forecasting, 2006 midterms |
| ||||||
| Thread Tools | |
| |
| vBulletin 3.7.2 -- Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd. | Custom Artwork and Theme (TM) 2006, Liberty Lounge |