Originally Posted by 7960 Yes, I should be able to. But if I change my party then I'm not longer the former party's candidate. So did we figure out that a candidate can be on a ballot more than once? That just doesn't seem right....
| | #21 | ||||
| Never, never, never give up Conservative Party High Point, NC ![]()
| |||||
| Register to Reply to This Post |
| | #22 | ||||
| Ignore list is for pussies. Realist ![]() ![]()
| Originally Posted by Stylerod If #2 passes then yes, they'll be on the ballot more than once in Massachusetts (7 states already allow it, NY being one).
I recinded my approval for #2 for that reason alone. I think the rest of the question is good, but the confusion that "fusion voting" will create (IMO) is not worth the price. | ||||
| Register to Reply to This Post |
| | #23 | ||||
| Ignore list is for pussies. Realist ![]() ![]()
| Here's the example they gave... Candidate X is (R) and Mr Smith is running as a (D) but he also wants recognition from the "I love baby whales" crowd so he has himself listed on their party as well. So the ballot would look like this: Candidate X (R) Mr Smith (D) Mr Smith (I love baby whales) X gets 48%. Smith (D) gets 40% and Smith (I love baby whales) get 10%. Smith wins 50% to X's 48%. Fuck that...the rest of the stuff on the ballot is good but that alone is makes it worth a no vote. | ||||
| Register to Reply to This Post |
| | #24 | ||||
| Never, never, never give up Conservative Party High Point, NC ![]()
| Originally Posted by 7960
| ||||
| Register to Reply to This Post |
| | #25 | ||||
| Junkie Conservative Party ![]()
| Originally Posted by 7960 jumping parties in the middle of an election is pretty bs. Go independent if you want to run.
| ||||
| Register to Reply to This Post |
| Register to Post a Reply |
| Bookmarks |
| Tags |
| massachusetts, election, confusion, 2006 midterms |
| ||||||
| Thread Tools | |
| |
| vBulletin 3.7.2 -- Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd. | Custom Artwork and Theme (TM) 2006, Liberty Lounge |