Originally Posted by Thorgrim It's something that's going to have to be discussed with Bush before they try anything, thats why its all over the place If Bush is going to veto it, theres no point in having a big huff over raising taxes (just to Clinton-era levels) on those ...
| | #21 | ||||
| Administrator libertarian Oklahoma ![]()
| Originally Posted by Thorgrim Most democrats I've heard have proposed increases for those with household incomes as low as 60k/yr...the only person who vocally spoke out against tax increases was Ford and he's gone
| ||||
| Register to Reply to This Post |
| | #22 | ||||
| ..... your a worthless poster Realist ![]() ![]()
| This "paris hilton" thing always makes me laugh...yes, her family is rich so she's rich and doesn't have to work. But her not needing to watch a window at McDonalds doesn't mean she's not contributing to the economy. In fact she's probably contributing MORE than you. She has employees, she spends a shitload, she consumes, she donates a ton of money to charity...she's the perfect "rich person" in your eyes, except that while she's doing all that she's also rich. I guess you guys want your cake and want to eat it, too...if you can figure out how to get her to do all that stuff *and* make her poor then you'll probably creem your pants. Wait, how about this?? I propose *NO* wealth can be handed from generation to generation. EVERY child has to start from scratch. If there are no children then ENTIRE estate is absorbed and redistributed. Think that's a better plan? | ||||
| Register to Reply to This Post |
| | #23 | ||||
| America Fuck Yea Election Moderator Republican In Name Only ![]()
| |||||
| Register to Reply to This Post |
| | #24 | ||||
| Common Sense Conservative Realist ![]()
| I don't see it happening. The Dems are all about helping the middle class these days. If anything, they'll give the middle class a tax cut and the rich a tax hike. They'd shoot themselves in the foot by raising taxes on the middle class. Besides, I haven't heard any dems talk about that...who are you referring to with this 60K thing? Even Pelosi in the OP said it would be for those earning over 200K a year. | ||||
| Register to Reply to This Post |
| | #25 | ||||
| Common Sense Conservative Realist ![]()
| |||||
| Register to Reply to This Post |
| | #26 | ||||
| Banned - Self Imposed Progressive Philadelphia, PA ![]() ![]()
| Originally Posted by 6SpeedTA95 No way, I'm far left and I'd call that ridiculous
The lowest they'd even think of goin is about 120k, but thats pretty low and an old idea that inflation and price increases have outgrown 200k is a nice round number and it makes people think "jees thats a lot I don't care where you live" | ||||
| Register to Reply to This Post |
| | #27 | ||||
| Friend to all. Socialist Maryland ![]() ![]()
| It's fucking retarded to say "the democrats are going to raise your taxes!" like it's a fucking bad thing or something? Someone has to do SOMETHING to get the country's fiscal health in order instead of making us look like retards being in debt to EVERYONE. We are a debtor nation to Mexico people...fucking MEXICO! If they want to raise my taxes to fix this bullshit, be my guest. | ||||
| Register to Reply to This Post |
| | #28 | ||||
| Appeasement the mother's milk of Cowards Independent USA ![]()
| Originally Posted by Donkey® Mexico by all rights owes us billions. Send them the bill for just the last five years of money spent taking care of thier citizens that are vacationing all over our country. That includes education and free medical care along with untold numbers of social programs handing those illegals tons and tons of money.
That money comes from us the american citizen taxpayer. The illegals have more rights than I do and can get more help from the government than I ever could. Bill them, hell yes bill them and if they do not pay bring our troops home for redeployment. | ||||
| Register to Reply to This Post |
| | #29 | ||||
| Baka Idealist Adelaide, Australia ![]()
| Originally Posted by Tyr-Ziu Saxnot This isn't going to happen.
Also Mexico isn't responsible for what the citizens do. Just like if someone from the US killed someone in Mexico the US isn't responsible for what they did. | ||||
| Register to Reply to This Post |
| | #30 | ||||
| Common Sense Conservative Realist ![]()
| Originally Posted by Tyr-Ziu Saxnot
| ||||
| Register to Reply to This Post |
| | #31 | ||||
| Appeasement the mother's milk of Cowards Independent USA ![]()
| Originally Posted by Kytro Certainly it isnt going to happen. That was my point!
However Mexico does have responsibility concerning the huge numbers of thier citizens illegally invading our country. The Mexican government encouraged the exodus. The mexican government even aided its citizens in breaking our laws to enter illegally. The mexican government saves billions of dollars by this exodus to our country. Yet you attempt to portray them as white washed angels on this issue! When the hands are dirty don't rub more dirt on then declare them clean. | ||||
| Register to Reply to This Post |
| | #32 | ||||
| helluo librorum The Lab Moderator Humanist Chicago Suburbs ![]() ![]()
| |||||
| Register to Reply to This Post |
| | #33 | ||||
| Braccae tuae aperiuntur. Reform Party NJ ![]() ![]()
| When the government hands out fliers encouraging people to kill us and gives them pamphlets on how to do it.. then yes they are responsible. | ||||
| Register to Reply to This Post |
| | #34 | ||||
| Appeasement the mother's milk of Cowards Independent USA ![]()
| Originally Posted by Scrumtralecent
I hope the shock didn't hurt you too much. Looking out for thier interests was not the point. Aiding and encouraging was. What part of that did you fail to understand? If your ability to comprehend is too slow I will send you pms later. I do however charge for private tutoring... | ||||
| Register to Reply to This Post |
| | #35 | ||||
| America Fuck Yea Election Moderator Republican In Name Only ![]()
| |||||
| Register to Reply to This Post |
| | #36 | ||||
| Banned Conservative Government is another way to say Better Than You ![]()
| |||||
| Register to Reply to This Post |
| | #37 | ||||
| Deuteronomy 32:41 Paleolibertarian USA ![]()
| Why don't you just move to China, where micromanagement is everywhere, and everyone is encouraged to be a mindless worker-bee.
__________________ -Avengeance | ||||
| Register to Reply to This Post |
| | #38 | ||||
| Banned Conservative Government is another way to say Better Than You ![]()
| |||||
| Register to Reply to This Post |
| | #39 | ||||
| Deuteronomy 32:41 Paleolibertarian USA ![]()
| Originally Posted by Donkey® Because some people just can't imagine actually reducing spending. That's right. I don't own a Lexus. Why? Because it would be beyond my budget. That means one of THREE things: I have to steal from someone else so I can still buy my Lexus (democrat), OR I can borrow money so I pay on it for years and not actually own it (republican), or I can simply come to the conclusion that I can't afford it, and buy a used Toyota instead (libertarian).
America will drown unless we stop depending on either theft or borrowing to fund our obese government, and trim down the fat. | ||||
| Register to Reply to This Post |
| | #40 | ||||
| helluo librorum The Lab Moderator Humanist Chicago Suburbs ![]() ![]()
| Originally Posted by ballz2wallz None of those things even exist in China.
Keep reaching though. You guys need to get used to the fact that the middle isn't on your side of the line anymore. | ||||
| Register to Reply to This Post |