Originally Posted by Thorgrim The founders who held communists beliefs did so in their youth when they had little to no knowledge of how STALINIST soviet russia worked When outside information was finally recieved, that sort of communist was roundly rejected, the founder himself wrote a book: A New Slavery ...
| | #41 | ||||
| Braccae tuae aperiuntur. Reform Party NJ ![]() ![]()
| Originally Posted by Thorgrim Many of the founders were communist. In fact, they kicked out many members decades after they were founded because they were still communist! To say they had no communist roots, when they themselves admit to kicking out many of their founders for being ... *gasp* communist, is absurd. Essentially all of their founders have communist roots and many of their founders continued their ideology for many years after the organization was started. They admitted to the problem by kicking many of those members out for communist reasonings.
The ACLU spawned out of previous organizations which were... communist, and many of the founders and high players in the ACLU were communist and served on the organization for many, many years. They slowly turned socialist, but many would still say they have socialist practices and one can make a very strong argument that they slant very far left. | ||||
| Register to Reply to This Post |
| | #42 | ||||
| Junkie Conservative Party ![]()
| Originally Posted by Thorgrim Not talking about just having more money. The whole entrepreneurs experience doesn't exist in a communist environment. Communistism = no great new inventions or methods.
| ||||
| Register to Reply to This Post |
| | #43 | ||||
| helluo librorum The Lab Moderator Humanist Chicago Suburbs ![]() ![]()
| Originally Posted by Diesel66 As long as they ban any religion from doing it, it isn't discrimination.
| ||||
| Register to Reply to This Post |
| | #44 | ||||
| Braccae tuae aperiuntur. Reform Party NJ ![]() ![]()
| Originally Posted by Scrumtralecent Sure it is, it's discrimination towards religion. What if they banned groups that didn't have a religious affiliation, would that not be discriminatory? Why are public facilities turned down to people of faith? That's not discriminatory?
I can't not hire someone because of their religious beliefs or lack there of. But the government can tell the Boy Scouts they can't use a park because of their religious beliefs. That's not absurd to you? | ||||
| Register to Reply to This Post |
| | #45 | ||||
| helluo librorum The Lab Moderator Humanist Chicago Suburbs ![]() ![]()
| Originally Posted by JaJae Wait...so kicking people out for being communists makes them communist?
You just talked yourself in a circle. The ACLU defends civil rights for groups that don't have other orginizations in place to defend them. | ||||
| Register to Reply to This Post |
| | #46 | ||||
| Braccae tuae aperiuntur. Reform Party NJ ![]() ![]()
| |||||
| Register to Reply to This Post |
| | #47 | ||||
| helluo librorum The Lab Moderator Humanist Chicago Suburbs ![]() ![]()
| Originally Posted by JaJae Yep, when it comes to public land use it isn't.
What part of "No state land for religious use" is discrimitory. You already have a nearly free space to practice your religion. It's called a church. | ||||
| Register to Reply to This Post |
| | #48 | ||||
| Braccae tuae aperiuntur. Reform Party NJ ![]() ![]()
| Originally Posted by Scrumtralecent Where do you see this "no state land for religious use"?
What makes it ok in your mind for a group of religious protectors to go to a public place and slam religion, but a religious group can't have a picnic at a park? | ||||
| Register to Reply to This Post |
| | #49 | ||||
| helluo librorum The Lab Moderator Humanist Chicago Suburbs ![]() ![]()
| It's state endorsement of religion. Originally Posted by JaJae Religious protectors slamming religion? What are you talking about?
A religous group can go have a picnic at the park. Tell everyone to meet you there. I'm sorry that you can't have full blown events there though. The area is still open for you and your family to use. | ||||
| Register to Reply to This Post |
| | #50 | ||||
| Braccae tuae aperiuntur. Reform Party NJ ![]() ![]()
| |||||
| Register to Reply to This Post |
| | #51 | ||||
| Banned - Self Imposed Progressive Philadelphia, PA ![]() ![]()
| Originally Posted by JaJae It's pretty easy to sit back and throw spitballs talking about people who died before you were born
Ya know what, all our US presidents until Kennedy were idiots because they didn't push hard for a complete Civil Rights bill as signed in the 1960s wow, wasn't that easy! America was founded by people who were either slave owners or slave owner sympathizers, boo! "communist roots" is a vague term it could be applied to a huge chunk of the country in 1931, in fact historian think there might have been a POPULAR communist uprising You're intelligent enough to know that being a communist-thinker in 1910 and being a Stalinist Communist are completely different things Many of Socrates students and Plato's own uncle went on to lead a regime of terror in Athens Critias - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia Maybe they should have killed all of Socrates students and Plato and burned all his works because look how some people totally misapplied what they learned Before the US entered WW2, and before the public even fully knew of how Stalin was handling Russia, the ACLU took out any communist, even if they were anti-Stalin And you're stretching with the socialism, and even if you were right, who cares? We have a United States Senator who is a socialist, is socialist supposed to be a slur...because they don't get a lot of votes in general electiosn and aren't very popular? I guess I could call someone a libertarian as a slur word | ||||
| Register to Reply to This Post |
| | #52 | ||||
| Last Starfighter Independent Northern California ![]()
| So if Wiccans held their nature rituals on a Solstice on an Army base, that would be state endorsement of religion? | ||||
| Register to Reply to This Post |
| | #53 | ||||
| Last Starfighter Independent Northern California ![]()
| And, what if Satanists hold their rituals on say, a state run park such as Yellowstone. Is that state endorsement of religion? | ||||
| Register to Reply to This Post |
| | #54 | ||||
| Braccae tuae aperiuntur. Reform Party NJ ![]() ![]()
| It's pretty easy to sit back and throw spitballs talking about people who died before you were born I'm not throwing spitballs. I'm stating facts that you're choosing to ignore. I said nothing negative about them or the ideals of communism, just stated the facts as they were. It's very easy to have the facts after they've died, because their speeches and actions have gone down in history and recorded. Which makes proving my point extremely easy. Ya know what, all our US presidents until Kennedy were idiots because they didn't push hard for a complete Civil Rights bill as signed in the 1960s What does Kennedy and the civil rights bill have to do with this topic? wow, wasn't that easy! America was founded by people who were either slave owners or slave owner sympathizers, boo! What is the relevence here? "communist roots" is a vague term it could be applied to a huge chunk of the country in 1931, in fact historian think there might have been a POPULAR communist uprising If you consider it vague and a huge chunk of the country was communist in 1931, then why are you arguing against this? You're intelligent enough to know that being a communist-thinker in 1910 and being a Stalinist Communist are completely different things I never stated they were Stalinist, just that they had communist roots. Which you have been wrongly disagreeing with. Many of Socrates students and Plato's own uncle went on to lead a regime of terror in Athens Critias - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia Still having trouble understanding the relevence... Maybe they should have killed all of Socrates students and Plato and burned all his works because look how some people totally misapplied what they learned Still have no idea what relevence this has to the thread. Before the US entered WW2, and before the public even fully knew of how Stalin was handling Russia, the ACLU took out any communist, even if they were anti-Stalin Correction, any outspoken and fully admitted communist. And you're stretching with the socialism, and even if you were right, who cares? We have a United States Senator who is a socialist, is socialist supposed to be a slur...because they don't get a lot of votes in general electiosn and aren't very popular? I guess I could call someone a libertarian as a slur word If you don't care why all the irrelevent information in this post? Where did I incinuate it was a slur? I definitely wouldn't disagree that you would call someone a libertarian as a slur word. But what does this have to do with anything relevent to the ACLU and their communist roots or the notion that they moved towards socialism and now are considered by many to be very far left? | ||||
| Register to Reply to This Post |
| | #55 | ||||
| Banned - Self Imposed Progressive Philadelphia, PA ![]() ![]()
| I thought we were talking about the OP as the main topic of this thread, which states: "The three Wise Men are Lenin, Marx, and Stalin because the founders of the ACLU were strident supporters of Soviet style Communism" I've been arguing against the topics premise that are Stalinist roots in the ACLU, as I've stated their founder wrote a brutal anti-soviet communist book Then you play the "oh im just highlighting a historical fact, I don't see what all these arguments are dealing with...its all irrelevant" please, put it "communist" and "ACLU" into google and see the first 100 pages that pop up, its all about how the ACLU is anti American/illogical/Stalinist because their founders believed in utopian ideals in their younger years It's also clearly what this OP is about | ||||
| Register to Reply to This Post |
| | #56 | ||||
| Baka Idealist Adelaide, Australia ![]()
| Originally Posted by JaJae From wikipedia:
| ||||
| Register to Reply to This Post |
| | #57 | ||||
| Anti-War, Anti-State, Pro-Free Market Capitalist ![]()
| |||||
| Register to Reply to This Post |
| | #58 | ||||
| Junkie Conservative Party ![]()
| |||||
| Register to Reply to This Post |
| | #59 | ||||
| Banned - Self Imposed Progressive Philadelphia, PA ![]() ![]()
| |||||
| Register to Reply to This Post |