The fact that people go to Canada / Mexico to get the drugs says there's a market demand for cheaper drugs, why should the government restrict access to them? Seems a little conflicting...
| | #21 | ||||
| ipsa Scientia Potestas est Pragmatist North Carolina ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
| The fact that people go to Canada / Mexico to get the drugs says there's a market demand for cheaper drugs, why should the government restrict access to them? Seems a little conflicting | ||||
| Register to Reply to This Post |
| | #22 | ||||
| America Fuck Yea Election Moderator Republican In Name Only ![]()
| |||||
| Register to Reply to This Post |
| | #23 | ||||
| ipsa Scientia Potestas est Pragmatist North Carolina ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
| I thought the libertarian philosophy was personal responsibility? | ||||
| Register to Reply to This Post |
| | #24 | ||||
| America Fuck Yea Election Moderator Republican In Name Only ![]()
| medication is not a normal good, where the average consumer can have knowledge of the product and will not know what the effects of the product they purchase until after they consumed, ex post. thus, there is a strong case for government regulation when it comes to medicine for these two facts. | ||||
| Register to Reply to This Post |
| | #25 | ||||
| ipsa Scientia Potestas est Pragmatist North Carolina ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
| So why shouldn't the government continue in its current role but allow foreign drugs to be placed on the market? | ||||
| Register to Reply to This Post |
| | #26 | ||||
| Bokonist Independent Kansas City ![]()
| Push back the age for recieving benefits. It's not nice, but it fixes the problem. And people don't really need 30 years of retirement. | ||||
| Register to Reply to This Post |
| | #27 | ||||
| America Fuck Yea Election Moderator Republican In Name Only ![]()
| |||||
| Register to Reply to This Post |
| | #28 | ||||
| Master Debator Election Moderator Democrat Omaha, NE ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
| I can't wait till they retire. We will see a lovely climb in wages because there will be fewer people to fill their positions they just left. I read some place that like 90% of CIO's and other vice president level managers in IT are in the baby boomer classification. The number of people seeking IT degrees has declined a bit... that means this NGA is gonna get paid within the next 10 years. | ||||
| Register to Reply to This Post |
| | #29 | ||||
| Administrator libertarian Oklahoma ![]()
| No they're not, they're the ones that refused to hold washington accountable for the tax dollars being spent, so they will be using OUR dollars to fund their retirement. I'm ok with that until they try to raise taxes on ME to fund their retirement. | ||||
| Register to Reply to This Post |
| | #30 | ||||
| Administrator libertarian Oklahoma ![]()
| Originally Posted by DosEquis This is very true...wages will go up but in many cases wages will go up to keep the older folks in the market...but you're right we will definately see wage increases.
| ||||
| Register to Reply to This Post |
| | #31 | ||||
| America Fuck Yea Election Moderator Republican In Name Only ![]()
| |||||
| Register to Reply to This Post |
| | #32 | ||||
| Political Genius Republican Yorba Linda Ca. ![]()
| Originally Posted by motivez
Most of that money has already been spent!
__________________ Sock It To Me! ![]() "Bureaucracy is a Parasite that Preys on Free Thought and Suffocates Free Spirit!" - Douglas Adams | ||||
| Register to Reply to This Post |
| | #33 | ||||
| Political Genius Republican Yorba Linda Ca. ![]()
| Originally Posted by kinggovernor
It will move us more in the direction of the entitlement problems they have in Germany and France already. It is going to cause a political rift between old and younger people. How bad it will get I don't know? If we want to get ahead of this we need serious entitlement reform and planning NOW but there is no political will to do it on both sides. Young people protest, old people VOTE and they are easy to confuse and scare! The problem is not just "when" they retire! It is not a magical date that we go into the Red. When they live longer they will expect to be of SS and Medicare for 20 years or more and the costs will mount.... | ||||
| Register to Reply to This Post |
| | #34 | ||||
| Administrator libertarian Oklahoma ![]()
| |||||
| Register to Reply to This Post |
| | #35 | ||||
| America Fuck Yea Election Moderator Republican In Name Only ![]()
| Originally Posted by DosEquis of course most of upper management is a in the baby boomer generation
| ||||
| Register to Reply to This Post |
| | #36 | ||||
| America Fuck Yea Election Moderator Republican In Name Only ![]()
| Originally Posted by 6SpeedTA95
It definetly can happen | ||||
| Register to Reply to This Post |
| | #37 | ||||
| Audaces fortuna iuvat Moderate Northern VA ![]()
| Originally Posted by kinggovernor
And yet Canada is off limits... who gives a fuck about Russian drugs? | ||||
| Register to Reply to This Post |
| | #38 | ||||
| The Bydo Empire must die! Independent ![]()
| The viewpoint missing from this thread is from those who actually live life at 65+. Most of you are probably under 30 and you can't have a real concept of what life is like at that age. At some point, you will NOT be able to hold a job no matter how much you want to. Your body just won't have the stamina for the stress. Getting dressed in the morning becomes a 3hour venture. going to the grocery store becomes the highlight of your day because that's what you've got the energy for. maybe if you're really lucky, you've got some family who will help take care of you. To expect 70+yos to compete with 30 yos for jobs is laughable at best, and downright cruel at worst. You all talk like you're going to save your sheckles and live like paupers now so you can afford to live when you retire...or maybe you think you're going to invest in the market and make it big enough so you can live in some comfort later. Nice pipe dreams.. life is known to throw curveballs at the least opportune times. Markets rise and crumble, and without some kind of group-based, non-profit healthcare system, you are only one heart attack, car accident, disease, or injury away from complete financial ruin. Despite what myopic conservatives tend to think, liberty is not merely the sum of how tightly one can hold on to his wallet. Quality of life is just as important, and we can't have that if only the richest 1% can afford reasonable healthcare. You can sit here and argue back and forth about who is wasting money and why or what justifies the difference between who 'payed in' vs who simply expects 'entitlement', but that gets us nowhere. You conservatives state some kind of private system is best while conveniently forgetting to mention that insurance companies post billions in profits from fixed-income retirees every year...billions that could be put to use paying for care instead of some exec's sports car...and don't' even get me started on insurance rate hikes. Private systems, where profit comes first, can be just as wasteful and corrupt as a public system where corrupt government officials justify the use of medical/retirement funds for their own agendas. Profit-over-care is NOT a solution no matter who holds the keys. Right wing and left wing need to get over their ideological egos and realize a hybrid system is needed to maintain some kind of balance between avg cost-to-citizen and effective coverage. It is really unfortunate that pragmatism and common sense are lost on both sides of the spectrum, because it means that OUR generation is the first one that will pay for these 'baby boomer' politicians' stupidity and arrogance. ...and for the record, I'm under 30 too...and someday we will all be 70. it's not 'us' vs 'them' because we will BE them someday. At 70, I for one don't want to be fighting for a few scraps of food at some poorly run, uncared for state facility because I had a heart attack at 65 which needed 150k in services. | ||||
| Register to Reply to This Post |
| | #39 | |||
| America Fuck Yea Election Moderator Republican In Name Only ![]()
|