There's more details now coming out about Bush's healthcare plan. This appears to be much better than I initially thought though I still do not like the idea of taxing the benefits in excess of 15,000 dollars. However, the across the board tax incentive for insurance definately seems like a ...
| | #1 | ||||
| Administrator libertarian Oklahoma ![]()
| More details on bush's health care plan... There's more details now coming out about Bush's healthcare plan. This appears to be much better than I initially thought though I still do not like the idea of taxing the benefits in excess of 15,000 dollars. However, the across the board tax incentive for insurance definately seems like a winner especially for anyone with a household income of less than 80k. There will be a significant tax savings for these individuals that must buy their own health insurance. According to the wall street journal the exemption is just like a personal exemption so all families can claim the 15,000 dollar exemption and all individuals can claim the 7500 exemption regardless of what their insurance actually costs. This will do two things, it will help offset premium costs and the higher deductible costs per year. That is definately a good thing. This will also encourage individuals who have insurance at work to shop around and perhaps create huge incentives for insurance companies to plug directly back in with consumers. Something the market desperately needs. A family making 60k/yr would save 4500/yr on taxes to put towards healthcare under this new plan. An individual making 40k/yr would get 2250 in tax benefits each year. This seems like a really good plan for the poor to upper middle class. The upper class look like they'd be left holding a slightly higher tax burden. Under the current system tax subsidies for families making 100,000 dollars are 2780/yr. While a family mkaing only 30k gets a mere 725 dollars in direct tax aid. This info came from the wall street journal page A12. In summary this plan looks to be much better than initially reported and there's not really any real reason for democrats to not support it based on their history. I still dont like the idea of a tax increase on those making more than 100k a year. | ||||
| Register to Reply to This Post |
| | #2 | ||||
| Junkie Conservative Party ![]()
| Yahoo! Personal Finance here is one big problem for the future.
| ||||
| Register to Reply to This Post |
| | #3 | ||||
| Audaces fortuna iuvat Moderate Northern VA ![]()
| If you make 30k, and have 4 dependants, is the tax a deduction when you file or is it actually a deduction in the taxes as witheld? I'm not so good at tax law, but if it's a yearly deduction, for a family that size who ends up with a slight refund every year it won't make any difference, it seems that it'll actually cost more since it's a deduction and not a credit. someone help me out here understanding this. | ||||
| Register to Reply to This Post |
| | #4 | ||||
| Political Genius Republican Yorba Linda Ca. ![]()
| I like the fact that it does not force anyone to buy health insurance or pay into a government plan. That is what Gov. Arnold want to do in California. Mandate that employers and even indidviduals get their own insurance or pay into a State plan. You have an incentive, but no arm twisting. But the Dems don't like either because it retains private health providers and Insurance. They want that part of the economy swallowed up by government so they can become their new dependents!
__________________ Sock It To Me! ![]() "Bureaucracy is a Parasite that Preys on Free Thought and Suffocates Free Spirit!" - Douglas Adams | ||||
| Register to Reply to This Post |
| | #5 | ||||
| Administrator libertarian Oklahoma ![]()
| Originally Posted by Pro Street You can do it either way...your ending tax bill would be lower, how you choose to take that money is up to you...
Diesel, thats a good point on indexing but they could 1) always adjust the indexing later and 2) much of the inflation in health costs are related a)to doctors having to carry very expensive malpractice and b)consumers (you and I) being detached from the monetary exchange process. This would change B and would make consumers more cost conscious and aware of the markets...by addressing B you make a huge dent in health care inflation and if the government fixes A then you have less inflationary pressure on the system. Granted it still may go up faster than inflation but this would drastically help the situation... | ||||
| Register to Reply to This Post |
| | #6 | ||||
| Administrator libertarian Oklahoma ![]()
| Originally Posted by RMNIXON I think a lot of level headed democrats will like this plan, pelosi might not and clinton might not but many others will IMO.
| ||||
| Register to Reply to This Post |
| | #7 | ||||
| Junkie Conservative Party ![]()
| Originally Posted by Pro Street file.
You make 50k and your insurance costs 7500. They take that money out before taxes and you only pay taxes on 42500. New system You make 50k and your insurance deduction is 7500. You pay taxes on 42500. | ||||
| Register to Reply to This Post |
| | #8 | ||||
| Administrator libertarian Oklahoma ![]()
| Originally Posted by Diesel66 You dont see the difference?
![]() Not matter what you now get to claim the max. So even if you're insurance is costing you 3k you get the full deduction which allows you to shop around for potentially better insurance. | ||||
| Register to Reply to This Post |
| | #9 | ||||
| Junkie Conservative Party ![]()
| |||||
| Register to Reply to This Post |
| | #10 | ||||
| Audaces fortuna iuvat Moderate Northern VA ![]()
| so.. if the tax per check doesn't get any cheaper, and a family making 30k that gets about a $200 refund per year (as in my case). Employers won't pay for insurance, and this will be a tax deduction... so I end up paying for health insurance (since they may not include it with this plan) and I the deduction means nothing in this case. it seems as though I'd pay more under this plan, since I'd be paying the full cost of insurance and the deduction won't really be anything. | ||||
| Register to Reply to This Post |
| | #11 | ||||
| Administrator libertarian Oklahoma ![]()
| |||||
| Register to Reply to This Post |
| | #12 | ||||
| Administrator libertarian Oklahoma ![]()
| Originally Posted by Pro Street No, thats wrong...
No matter what since you have a family you claim the 15k deduction, just like a personal exemption so basically you would get back all your federal taxes assuming you make 30k. | ||||
| Register to Reply to This Post |
| | #13 | ||||
| Baka Idealist Adelaide, Australia ![]()
| This is mostly for comparison purposes, health care in Australia (taken from wiki):
Income Tax Rates 2003-04 [4] Taxable income Tax on this income $0 – $6,000 Nil $6,001 – $21,600 17c for each $1 over $6,000 $21,601 - $52,000 $2,652 plus 30c for each $1 over $21,600 $52,001 – $62,500 $11,772 plus 42c for each $1 over $52,000 Over $62,500 $16,182 plus 47c for each $1 over $62,500 Income Tax Rates 2005-06 - excluding Family Tax Benefit[1] Taxable income Tax on this income $0 – $6,000 Nil $6,001 – $21,000 15c for each $1 over $6,000 $21,601 - $63,000 $2,340 plus 30c for each $1 over $21,600 $63,001 – $95,000 $14,760 plus 42c for each $1 over $63,000 Over $95,000 $28,200 plus 47c for each $1 over $95,000 [Income Tax Rates 2006-07 - excluding Family Tax Benefit[3] Taxable income Tax on this income $0 – $6,000 Nil $6,001 – $25,000 15c for each $1 over $6,000 $25,001 - $75,000 $2,850 plus 30c for each $1 over $25,000 $75,001 – $150,000 $17,850 plus 40c for each $1 over $75,000 Over $150,000 $47,850 plus 45c for each $1 over $150,000 | ||||
| Register to Reply to This Post |
| | #14 | ||||
| Administrator libertarian Oklahoma ![]()
| I find it funny that australia, a country with one of the better socialized medical systems in the world is trying to get people INTO the private sector. | ||||
| Register to Reply to This Post |
| | #15 | ||||
| Baka Idealist Adelaide, Australia ![]()
| Originally Posted by 6SpeedTA95 A focus of the current government. They be hard pressed to do so though because each year the premiums increase and make people less likely to take it up.
I have private coverage for peace of mind - choice of doctor, private room etc if I have to go to hospital. edit: Holy bad spelling, batman | ||||
| Register to Reply to This Post |
| | #16 | ||||
| Limited government ftw. Paleolibertarian ![]()
| my problem is if the problem was caused in the first place due to the tax code (it gave employers an incentive to give out health care as opposed to cash wages) why keep tinkering with the code? the best solution would be a simple flat tax and let the market decide who is getting healthcare and the best way for it to be provided (via employers, purchased on your own, etc.) It just digusting how much the tax code is distorting out economy If central planners dont know what goods to produce, etc. how do they know what to favor in the tax code? Last edited by TheScatman; 01-25-2007 at 01:25 AM.. | ||||
| Register to Reply to This Post |
| | #17 | ||||
| Audaces fortuna iuvat Moderate Northern VA ![]()
| Originally Posted by 6SpeedTA95
no... I won't. I asked someone I talk to who's working for H&R Block. It's a deduction.. so if you don't end up owing any money at all, then the deduction isn't used. i.e. 30k salary with a family of 5. so unless you make enough to actually owe taxes, you're now going to likely end up paying full for health care under this plan, and won't get shit for it. no thanks. | ||||
| Register to Reply to This Post |
| | #18 | ||||
| Administrator libertarian Oklahoma ![]()
| Originally Posted by TheScatman
| ||||
| Register to Reply to This Post |
| | #19 | ||||
| Administrator libertarian Oklahoma ![]()
| Originally Posted by Pro Street Yes thats correct, its a 15,000 dollar deduction for families.
If you already dont pay taxes of course there wont be a tax savings that wouldn't make any sense. How can you save money on something you're already paying zero on? | ||||
| Register to Reply to This Post |
| | #20 | ||||
| Junkie libertarian ![]()
| you should be able to write off any health care costs, not just specific ones. | ||||